Hi,
I had a texture-size limiter for flightgear in the past. I have to dig it out
first.
But please have a look at these textures. I doubt that it makes sense to have a
bump normal map twice the size of the livery it is applied to.
Olaf
Presumably you could just ask osg or the gl to
On 13 Apr 2012, at 23:28, Chris Forbes wrote:
Presumably you could just ask osg or the gl to discard the top mip level(s)
rather than altering the source art to work around apple's driver bugs?
Yeah, unfortunately I think people want the high-res art for a reason - this
needs a runtime test
Hi,
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 09:49:18 James Turner wrote:
On 13 Apr 2012, at 23:28, Chris Forbes wrote:
Presumably you could just ask osg or the gl to discard the top mip
level(s) rather than altering the source art to work around apple's
driver bugs?
Yeah, unfortunately I think
On 14 Apr 2012, at 10:10, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
But every image goes through our hands. We can just rescale this under
certain
conditions. At least the uncompressed textures are unproblematic.
I would introduce some property that is evaluated in the image load callback
than. Today the
On 14 Apr 2012, at 09:48, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
I had a texture-size limiter for flightgear in the past. I have to dig it out
first.
Okay, I think it would be a good thing to have anyway, since people have wildly
varying amounts of GPU ram
But please have a look at these textures. I doubt
Hi,
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 11:05:10 James Turner wrote:
On 14 Apr 2012, at 10:10, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
But every image goes through our hands. We can just rescale this under
certain conditions. At least the uncompressed textures are unproblematic.
I would introduce some property
-Stuart
On 14 Apr 2012, at 11:06, James Turner wrote:
On 14 Apr 2012, at 09:48, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
But please have a look at these textures. I doubt that it makes sense to
have a bump normal map twice the size of the livery it is applied to.
Ah, sorry, I agree this is unlikely :)
On 14.04.2012 13:08, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I like the idea of resizing textures at model loading time a lot.
The other option would be to switch the shader off. Presumably that
would not load the normal map into the GPU.
Shader textures are loaded unconditionally, at least into main memory.
Am 14.04.2012 um 13:08 schrieb Stuart Buchanan:
-Stuart
On 14 Apr 2012, at 11:06, James Turner wrote:
On 14 Apr 2012, at 09:48, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
But please have a look at these textures. I doubt that it makes sense to
have a bump normal map twice the size of the livery it is
Hi,
Here are my screen shots, please compare:
4096x4096 Texture
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17221087/fgfs-screen-003.png
2048x2048 Texture
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17221087/fgfs-screen-005.png
BTW: Are there really no rivets on the left side of the aircraft at the same
position?
Greetings,
Hi,
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 13:51:33 ThorstenB wrote:
On 14.04.2012 13:08, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I like the idea of resizing textures at model loading time a lot.
The other option would be to switch the shader off. Presumably that
would not load the normal map into the GPU.
On 14.04.2012 15:18, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Shader textures are loaded unconditionally, at least into main memory.
Hopefully GPU loading is optional - but I'm not sure.
Textures are loaded in main memory when the model that references them
is loaded. Handing textures over to OpenGL is
Hi,
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 17:16:52 ThorstenB wrote:
On 14.04.2012 15:18, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Shader textures are loaded unconditionally, at least into main memory.
Hopefully GPU loading is optional - but I'm not sure.
Textures are loaded in main memory when the model that
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
Hi,
Here are my screen shots, please compare:
4096x4096 Texture
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17221087/fgfs-screen-003.png
2048x2048 Texture
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17221087/fgfs-screen-005.png
I can see a difference - the 4096 rivets look
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I can see a difference - the 4096 rivets look more round and have
fewer rendering artefacts.
Looks nicer too! :)
Is there a way to increase the resolutin of the texture used for the
aircraft paint? Right now it looks like some kid has been after
Am 14.04.2012 12:06, schrieb James Turner:
On 14 Apr 2012, at 09:48, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
I had a texture-size limiter for flightgear in the past. I have to dig it
out first.
Okay, I think it would be a good thing to have anyway, since people have
wildly varying amounts of GPU ram
But
Hi,
on some Mac Models with Intel HD 3000 graphics flightgear showed a really nasty
flickering effect.
I had the problem with c172p and the bumpspec shader effect enabled.
After a lot of investigations I discovered that actually size matters. I get
this kind of flickering artifacts if
Presumably you could just ask osg or the gl to discard the top mip level(s)
rather than altering the source art to work around apple's driver bugs?
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to
18 matches
Mail list logo
