Re: [Flightgear-users] A note of thanks and a question

2007-07-13 Thread Stuart Buchanan
--- Innis Cunningham wrote: drew writes Now that I have your attention, a small question. I'm interested in sprucing up the scenery around my home village but am a little confused by the difference between fgsd and TerraGear, and what I should use to edit scenery. I would very much

[Flightgear-users] Details on FG native protocol?

2007-07-13 Thread Bernhard Kuhn
Hi! Me too likes to thank the FG developers - really an impressive piece of software! A friend of mine frequently flying with a Cessna 172 tried it out and said that the flight dynamics are pretty realistic! BTW.: i also purchased X-Plane, but it can't properly handle three displays in a

Re: [Flightgear-users] Details on FG native protocol?

2007-07-13 Thread Curtis Olson
Hi Bernhard, Have a look at the READM.IO file in documentation tree for example usage of the IO system. The native fdm protocol is defined in src/Network/net_fdm.hxx There are a couple (semi-convoluted) of driving FlightGear using this mechanism in utils/GPSsmooth/ Regards, Curt. On

Re: [Flightgear-users] Windows FlightGear 0.9.10 does it use OSG or not

2007-07-13 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, And how looks the time-table for the release? It's pretty difficult for aircraft developers to make aircrafts for both branches I would not beeing surprised if OSG overtakes plib before the release! ;-) HHS --- Curtis Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: FlightGear 0.9.10 and 0.9.11-pre*

Re: [Flightgear-users] Windows FlightGear 0.9.10 does it use OSG or not

2007-07-13 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 13 July 2007 21:29, Heiko Schulz wrote: Hi, And how looks the time-table for the release? It's pretty difficult for aircraft developers to make aircrafts for both branches I would not beeing surprised if OSG overtakes plib before the release! ;-) HHS No it is not difficult,