Re: [fltk.development] Fl_Browser: new FL_SORT_ASC/DESC

Before these become 'written in stone' when fltk.1.3.x releases, can they be changed to something more readable, like: FL_SORT_ASCEND FL_SORT_DESCEND I think that does sound better. +1 IMHO, FL_SORT_ASCENDING and FL_SORT_DESCENDING would be even better. Agreed, even

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2082: Under X, instances of Fl_Window do not have a Window Type set.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2082 Version: 1.3-feature Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2082 Version: 1.3-featureIndex: about_panel.fl

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2082: Under X, instances of Fl_Window do not have a Window Type set.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2082 Version: 1.3-feature Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2082 Version: 1.3-feature--- ./src/Fl_x.cxx.original 2009-03-09 12:01:20.0 -0300 +++

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2082: Under X, instances of Fl_Window do not have a Window Type set.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2082 Version: 1.3-feature Updated str2082_fluid-v3.patch. Updated str2082-v2_requires_str2053-v2.patch. The above patches compile cleanly against FLTK 1.3.x SVN r6672