Re: [fltk.development] List of all tags

2011-10-03 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 10/03/11 12:32, Matthias Melcher wrote: svn ls http://svn.easysw.com/public/fltk/fltk/tags/ [to get a list of tags] svn info http://svn.easysw.com/public/fltk/fltk/tags/release-1.3.0 to get the revision and date. Thanks! For posterity sake, I've updated:

[fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2728: Add test program to test for shadowed variables (-Wshadow)

2011-10-04 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2728 Version: 1.3-feature To test for problems with variable shadowing (for apps that compile against FLTK with e.g. -Wshadow), we could make one test program that

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2728: Add test program to test for shadowed variables (-Wshadow)

2011-10-04 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2728 Version: 1.3-feature Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2728 Version: 1.3-feature ___ fltk-dev mailing list

Re: [fltk.development] Lambda function in FLTK how to use?

2011-10-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 10/10/11 03:54, Yaskhan wrote: What language? sorry. c++0x Moving this thread to fltk.general. Please follow up there. (Subject has same title) ___ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2734: Checkbox Browser and Limit Input Length

2011-10-14 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2734 Version: 1.3-feature Haven't looked at the mods yet, but I'm thinking the intention of the current interface is for the app programmer to implement a change callback

[fltk.development] masking?

2011-10-18 Thread Greg Ercolano
Is there something like the opposite of an fl_clip(), eg. an 'fl_mask()'? There's a thread on fltk.general asking about making a Microsoft style widget label, where the label overlays the border box, eg: +-- label --+ | | |

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2740: Browser as feature rich as Windows listview controls.

2011-10-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR Active] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2740 Version: 1.3-feature See Fl_Table and Fl_Table_Row which provide such features. For clickable headers see examples/table-sort For row/col titles with col

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2740: Browser as feature rich as Windows listview controls.

2011-10-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
[STR Closed w/Resolution] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2740 Version: 1.3-feature Fix Version: 1.3-feature Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2740 Version: 1.3-feature Fix Version: 1.3-feature ___ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2740: Browser as feature rich asWindows listview controls.

2011-10-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 10/19/11 14:17, David wrote: Browser (listview) widget that allows column titles, column alignment (left/right/middle), column widths (fixed or resizable), clickable column titles for sorting, icons, checkboxes, etc.. See Fl_Table and Fl_Table_Row which provide such features. But

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2766: New configurable option tochange symbol prefix character

2011-11-09 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 11/09/11 14:06, David wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2766 Version: 1.3-feature This change allows someone to configure FLTK to use 0x0F as the symbol prefix character instead of @. This allows the

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2728: Add test program to test for shadowed variables (-Wshadow)

2011-11-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2728 Version: 1.3-feature Attached file shadow-variables-test-program.patch... Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2728 Version: 1.3-featureIndex: Makefile

Re: [fltk.development] Good tutorial for complex drawing functions

2011-12-07 Thread Greg Ercolano
Moving this thread over to fltk general with the same title so that I/we can respond. On 12/07/11 05:59, E. Torres wrote: Wikipedia is a good point to start with those kind of questions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_matrix On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:40 AM, MacArthur, Ian

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2766: New configurable optiontochangesymbolprefix character

2011-12-09 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 12/09/11 12:05, Bill Spitzak wrote: I would not do this, as it will make it impossible to link unrelated fltk-using code together as this would have to be a static value. Or we have to waste space to put the value on every widget. The user should be able to turn on the don't interpret @

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2766: New configurable optiontochangesymbolprefixcharacter

2011-12-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 12/10/11 05:51, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: On 12/09/11 12:05, Bill Spitzak wrote: I would not do this, as it will make it impossible to link unrelated fltk-using code together as this would have to be a static value. Or we have to waste space to put the value on every widget. Fully agreed

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2766: New configurable optiontochangesymbolprefixcharacter

2011-12-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
A global option to disable '@' processing On a slightly related tangent, one of the few things I've had to actually /modify/ fltk for to support my commercial app is adding ANSI escape sequences (eg. \033[xxx) to control per-character foreground and background color attributes in

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2766: New configurableoptiontochangesymbolprefixcharacter

2011-12-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 12/10/11 14:41, Ian MacArthur wrote: On 10 Dec 2011, at 20:44, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote: With this suggestion of VT100 we will have a kind of rich text ! that's nice ! I'm old enough to have done *quite a lot* of display work using VT100 escape sequences. What I'd take away from

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2766: New configurableoptiontochangesymbolprefixcharacter

2011-12-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 12/10/11 14:44, Ian MacArthur wrote: On 10 Dec 2011, at 21:38, Matthias Melcher wrote: Let's follow Obi Wan Kenobis suggestion and use the source, Luke. In the code below, you will see that we had an option to enable and disable the @ prefix all along, using the label type FL_NORMAL_LABEL

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2766: Newconfigurableoptiontochangesymbolprefixcharacter

2011-12-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 12/11/11 02:46, Ian MacArthur wrote: OK, maybe not VT100. Maybe VT220 then? :-) Ooo, pixels! I actually did render a mandelbrot on a VT220 back in 1986 once.. my first unix program, and it was all rendered with those ESC sequences. Took forever. Shot an

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2766: Newconfigurableoptiontochangesymbolprefixcharacter

2011-12-14 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 12/14/11 02:19, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: [html suggestion] the limited pseudo-html syntax that is used by Qt and Pango and possibly a large number of other pieces of software. This would let users write foo bboldibold italic/i/b and so on. Greg's idea (ANSI inspired

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2766:Newconfigurableoptiontochangesymbolprefixcharacter

2011-12-14 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 12/14/11 13:26, Ian MacArthur wrote: #define BOLD_ON \e[1m #define BOLD_OFF \e[0m const char *msg = BOLD_ON Alert! BOLD_OFF \nYour printer is on fire; Ah, but I see ESC[1m and I think Bold, ESC[0m and I think attributes off... Maybe that's just me... That's

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE]STR#2766:Newconfigurableoptiontochangesymbolprefixcharacter

2011-12-15 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 12/15/11 01:28, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: That's true -- technically I should have used: #define BOLD_OFF \e[21m ..but \e[0m is so much easier to remember to turn off everything :P Ah, we may be talking at crossed-purposes - I was not meaning to be

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: New home needed for fltk.org...

2012-01-04 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/04/12 09:41, Duncan Gibson wrote: I am in the process of closing down Easy Software Products. As many of you know, fltk.org is hosted on the easysw.com server. Our current colocation contract ends in April 2012, and while I might be able to extend things on a month-to-month basis I

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Handling ABI features [was: STR #2795: Fl_Tree: needs tobe optimized to handle very large contents (10000)]

2012-01-06 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/06/12 06:28, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Moving this thread to fltk.development ... Please post follow-ups to fltk.development. On 05.01.2012 18:15, Greg Ercolano wrote: Looks like fltree.patch would break the ABI, so we can probably not apply this in fltk 1.3.x. Good point. Hmm, we

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Handling ABI features [was: STR #2795: Fl_Tree: needs tobeoptimizedto handle very large contents (10000)]

2012-01-07 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/07/12 02:29, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: To close that hole, perhaps we should add a requirement to the CMP so that all new .0 releases must first resolve all FL_ABI_FEATURE's are resolved before release. So in other words, make sure any source files that show up

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Handling ABI features [was: STR #2795: Fl_Tree: needs tobeoptimizedtohandlevery large contents (10000)]

2012-01-08 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/08/12 04:48, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: This is *not* dependent on linking statically or dynamically! If your version of the FLTK lib is compiled with another ABI version macro than you define in your application, then you *have* different ABI versions in your application. Oh, I

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Handling ABI features [was: STR #2795: Fl_Tree: needs tobeoptimizedtohandleverylargecontents (10000)]

2012-01-09 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/09/12 03:19, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: I'd think the version# would simply be set at FLTK build time, 'baked' into one of the .H files, and then could not be changed unless the lib were rebuilt. Okay, but it would be difficult (at least I think so) to change the file

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Handling ABI features [was: STR #2795: Fl_Tree: needs tobeoptimizedtohandlevery large contents (10000)]

2012-01-09 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/08/12 04:48, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Users are encouraged to do something like this in their main program or wherever they have potential ABI differences: if (fl_abi_version() != FL_ABI_VERSION) fl_abort (FLTK ABI version mismatch: %d != %d, fl_abi_version(),

Re: [fltk.development] collect all fltk libraries

2012-01-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/12/12 09:05, Mariwan wrote: HI, Please FLTK developer try to find a way to collect the small projects (small extra library that is an extentions for fltk). As you didn't like my suggestion for the git , and it is up to you to do so but collecting the widgets beside the core FLTK is

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Handling ABI features

2012-01-14 Thread Greg Ercolano
I really need to check these Fl_Tree ABI features to get it off my plate, otherwise I fear I'll forget to get around to it. In the interest of time, I'm going to go with Albrecht's idea of using FLTK_ABI_VERSION with a release number, eg: FLTK_ABI_VERSION 10302

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Handling ABI features

2012-01-17 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/17/12 01:32, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: I guess what I'd really want is a macro like: I_AM_LINKING_STATIC_SO_GIVE_ME_THE_LATEST_AND_GREATEST_ABI_OPTIONS (well, maybe the actual name might be shorter than that) to get at the latest supported ABI without having to

[fltk.development] CMP modifications

2012-01-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
I really need to check these Fl_Tree ABI features to get it off my plate, otherwise I fear I'll forget to get around to it. In the interest of time, I'm going to go with Albrecht's idea of using FLTK_ABI_VERSION with a release number, eg: FLTK_ABI_VERSION 10302

Re: [fltk.development] Are spammers are using the front page ofFLTK?

2012-01-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/23/12 10:22, Yuri P. Fedorchenko wrote: hm i also have a problem. when i try open, for example, http://www.cli.di.unipi.it/~demiche/3DPlanetarium.html i have: Forbidden You don't have permission to access /~demiche/3DPlanetarium.html on this server. It's just a stale link.

[fltk.development] RFC: website comments for docs (doxygen)

2012-01-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
One of the things I liked about the old 1.1.x docs was we were able to make comments against the docs. Kinda handy for users. Not sure how to pull this off with doxygen, but perhaps we can make a post-process for our doxygen website pages that hooks some HTML at the bottom of all the doxygen

Re: [fltk.development] Regarding FLTK licences for free use.

2012-01-30 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/30/12 01:05, duraisamy wrote: Dear Friends, We would like to make sure that software is free or license. FLTK is free and can be used in free or commercial software for free. We would like to know whether we have to satisfy any licensing agreement to make the software

[fltk.development] Qt licensing [was: Regarding FLTK licences for free use.]

2012-01-30 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/30/12 01:05, duraisamy wrote: Now, we were used Qt 4.6.2 version in our embedded device. It is going to be licences very soon. so we plan to switch over fltk. Although we're happy you'd like to use FLTK, it might save you some trouble to make sure you're right

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: website comments for docs (doxygen)

2012-01-31 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/24/12 06:46, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Yeah, the old approach (with FLTK 1.1) was IIRC to display a standard header, then followed by the normal HTML page, and then by the form needed to show and add comments. Or similar... Unfortunately this didn't work with the doxygen docs, maybe

Re: [fltk.development] fltk 3.0 libpng/jpeg/etc

2012-02-21 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 02/21/12 02:01, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: This is VERY bad because this code is vastly out of date and bloated, and skips processor optimizations that the main ones have in them. Basically on Linux and BSD, these should NEVER be used. Um, I don't understand. What's out of

Re: [fltk.development] fltk 3.0 namespace

2012-02-22 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 02/22/12 09:13, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: I'd say its easier to do it locally once you've installed your own test environment. Thanks for the advice. Yes, got it all working in about 45 mins. Just defaults for everything. Installed LAMP and downloaded the

Re: [fltk.development] fltk downloads page: visually separating releases and developmentversions [was: Re: fltk 3.0 namespace]

2012-02-22 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 02/22/12 10:14, Greg Ercolano wrote: So I should be able to change software.php to do this: http://seriss.com/people/erco/fltk/tmp/fltk-downloads.png Basically adding an if() statement that checks to see if the version starts with 1. or not. Later, we can change that logic when one

Re: [fltk.development] fltk downloads page: visually separating releases and developmentversions[was: Re: fltk 3.0 namespace]

2012-02-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 02/22/12 23:50, chris wrote: Something seems to be screwed up.,. Some of the tables now have a 100% above the header. For example on the startpage: 100% -- Quickinfo .. 100% --- Release Schedule Thanks for the report; fixed.

Re: [fltk.development] Anybody interested in Wayland?

2012-02-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 02/23/12 07:07, james wrote: As a part of my project torapp guilloche designer(www.torapp.info), I used cairo to render everything, and the output is amazing. Yes; the mechanical precision of how cairo draws edges really changes everything. From your app's gallery:

Re: [fltk.development] fltk downloads page: visually separating releases and developmentversions[was:Re: fltk 3.0 namespace]

2012-02-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 02/23/12 01:00, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: I only hope that people don't select the *red* versions, because that seems to be /highlighted/, so it must be the most important (*best*) versions... ;-) Ya, I was thinking about adding that extra thing I mentioned so that when

Re: [fltk.development] fltk downloads page: visually separating releases and developmentversions[was:Re:fltk 3.0 namespace]

2012-02-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 02/23/12 09:28, Greg Ercolano wrote: On 02/23/12 01:00, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: I only hope that people don't select the *red* versions, because that seems to be /highlighted/, so it must be the most important (*best*) versions... ;-) Ya, I was thinking about adding [..] an alert

Re: [fltk.development] fltk downloads page: visually separating releases and development versions[was:Re:fltk3.0 namespace]

2012-02-24 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 02/24/12 09:17, Greg Ercolano wrote: On 02/24/12 07:12, Torsten Giebl wrote: But, I'll see if I can revisit and try to make some kind of row separator that keeps it all in the same table, OK, just checked in some mods that keeps all the entries in the same table

Re: [fltk.development] [WWW] r658 - in trunk: . phplib

2012-02-25 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 02/24/12 16:51, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Hi Greg, there seems to be a bug in function html_empty_row() Thanks; got it. ___ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Re: [fltk.development] FLTK_ABI_VERSION mods

2012-03-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/20/12 01:41, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Should we put a version of FLTK_ABI_VERSION in Enumerations.h, maybe set to 10300 or such, and a commented out version set to 10302, along with some comments outlining their purpose? I think what I'll do for the short term is add

Re: [fltk.development] Request for feedback (Manolo?)

2012-03-02 Thread Greg Ercolano
I added some comments to Fl_Text_Buffer::utf8_input_filter() in r9260. Could the author of that function (Manolo?) or someone familiar with utf8/cp1252 check them for correctness? [..] On 03/02/12 08:26, Manolo Gouy wrote: I have checked the comments you added and found them excellent (I

Re: [fltk.development] FLTK_ABI_VERSION mods

2012-03-04 Thread Greg Ercolano
I'll try to also follow through to document this in the CMP, with the provision that this is an evolving topic. I should also try to merge in all that other stuff awaiting addition to the CMP. That would be most excellent! +1 ;-) OK, updated the CMP. The

Re: [fltk.development] FLTK_ABI_VERSION mods

2012-03-05 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/04/12 19:10, Greg Ercolano wrote: OK, updated the CMP. Fleshed out the CMP's index at the top to include all the headings in the doc. ___ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Re: [fltk.development] FLTK_ABI_VERSION mods

2012-03-05 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/01/12 12:31, Ian MacArthur wrote: On 01/20/12 01:41, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Should we put a version of FLTK_ABI_VERSION in Enumerations.h, maybe set to 10300 or such, and a commented out version set to 10302, along with some comments outlining their purpose? I

Re: [fltk.development] Doublebuffering issues and general thoughtsfroma frustrated long time FLTK user.

2012-03-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
[CORRECTION]: On 03/11/12 11:43, Greg Ercolano wrote: So for instance, today [*if*] one of us had a version of just Fl_Widget that entirely uses Cairo, we could include it in the FLTK 1.x source as e.g. Fl2_Widget ..emphasis on 'if'. And I don't know

Re: [fltk.development] Doublebuffering issues and general thoughtsfroma frustrated long time FLTK user.

2012-03-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/11/12 14:54, Duncan Gibson wrote: OP described 2 separate issues: 1. slow performance of offscreen overlays, and 2. improving the look/performance of widgets using Cairo I agree that improving the widget's look is a good idea, and perhaps it should start with making a new

Re: [fltk.development] Doublebuffering issues and generalthoughtsfroma frustrated long time FLTK user.

2012-03-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/12/12 10:28, J. Liles wrote: Just to keep this discussion sane: the only thing that widgets containing only straight lines have to benefit from Cario is alpha blending. And any changes to style would be better made in the boxtypes... It's more important that fl_line, arc, curve,

Re: [fltk.development] Doublebuffering issues andgeneralthoughtsfroma frustrated long time FLTK user.

2012-03-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/12/12 20:30, J. Liles wrote: However, when I dig into the FLTK code to look for a place to install this permanently, I find a bizarre mess of #if defined(USE_X11) type junk. What is the point of having different classes that inherit from Fl_Graphics_Driver if you're just going to

[fltk.development] dumping IDE support [was: Doublebuffering issues andgeneralthoughtsfromafrustrated long time FLTK user.]

2012-03-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/13/12 07:16, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: The main problem we have with these changes is that it is difficult for us (devs) to change all IDE files (Win VC++, Mac Xcode) and other build systems (e.g. CMake), since we don't have some older dev tools (VC++) etc. There is work in progress,

Re: [fltk.development] Doublebufferingissuesandgeneralthoughtsfroma frustrated longtime FLTK user.

2012-03-13 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/13/12 15:06, J. Liles wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Ian MacArthur imacart...@gmail.com wrote: Cairo's PDF output is pretty good, FWIW - so if we had a Cairo backend, we could get PDF output for free too Just a passing thought... Yeah, I'd say it's pretty good. And it

Re: [fltk.development] Doublebuffering issues and generalthoughtsfrom a frustrated long time FLTK user.

2012-03-18 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/18/12 14:11, Ian MacArthur wrote: Can't comment on Epichord, but ISTR that Nuke (and maybe CinePaint) were using fltk2 at some point. More recent Nuke versions were moved to QT for compatibility with the house standards in their new stable. No idea about the current state of Cinepaint...

Re: [fltk.development] Doublebuffering issues and general thoughtsfrom a frustrated longtime FLTK user.

2012-03-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/19/12 05:59, james wrote: I did tried your torapp on chrome and I have some sugestions about it, mainly usability: font size and scrollbars too small. The scrollbars are so thin that is hard to use then. Overall it's an interest use of nativeclient possibilities. Thank you very much

Re: [fltk.development] Doublebuffering issues and general thoughtsfrom a frustrated long time FLTK user.

2012-03-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/19/12 15:09, J. Liles wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Ian MacArthur imacart...@gmail.com wrote: I've done this mainly because, despite spending many hours of trial and error, I cannot seem to get Cairo to reliably draw 1px thick lines at integer coordinates (even using the device

Re: [fltk.development] Doublebuffering issues and general thoughtsfroma frustrated long time FLTK user.

2012-03-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/19/12 17:59, Greg Ercolano wrote: On 03/19/12 15:09, J. Liles wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Ian MacArthur imacart...@gmail.com wrote: I've done this mainly because, despite spending many hours of trial and error, I cannot seem to get Cairo to reliably draw 1px thick lines

Re: [fltk.development] Doublebuffering issues and generalthoughtsfroma frustrated long time FLTK user.

2012-03-20 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 03/20/12 13:53, Jerome M. Berger wrote: Speaking of 3.0, is it already usable? With *relative* widget coordinates? (the latter is the main reason I use 2.0 instead of 1.x). Unless you want to help with 3.0 dev or testing, I would suggest against using it until it has

Re: [fltk.development] Wonko's place

2012-04-02 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/01/12 18:37, Bill Spitzak wrote: Oops I meant to send this to somebody else, not to the email list This is what Matthias has been up to lately however. His nickname at Digital Domain was Wonko. On 04/01/2012 03:34 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote: http://www.weinbrennerei-dujardin.de/

Re: [fltk.development] Wonko's place

2012-04-02 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/02/12 12:10, Duncan Gibson wrote: This is what Matthias has been up to lately however. His nickname at Digital Domain was Wonko. So Matt and Greg both worked with you at DD. No wonder they are FLTK gurus :-) Yes, I played with FLTK a bit at DD, but didn't actually use

Re: [fltk.development] Wonko's place

2012-04-03 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/03/12 03:22, Matthias Melcher wrote: (Mike very early [on] IIRC), Yes, I recall Bill telling me about this guy on the east coast who had made a whole website for FLTK, put it under source code control, set up newsgroups, etc.. all for 'free'! Linux became popular,

Re: [fltk.development] Old FLTK2/Cairo poll Was: Re: Doublebuffering issues and general thoughtsfrom a frustrated long time FLTK user.

2012-04-05 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/05/12 16:26, Fabien Costantini wrote: Today, I would vote for removing the visual studio 2xxx ide projects and stick with cmake. I'd like to use cmake, but it's distressing that it isn't native to any of the OS's we support. ('Command not found' on OSX/Lion,

Re: [fltk.development] Old FLTK2/Cairo poll Was: Re: Doublebuffering issues and generalthoughtsfrom a frustrated long time FLTK user.

2012-04-05 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/05/12 19:41, Greg Ercolano wrote: On 04/05/12 16:26, Fabien Costantini wrote: Today, I would vote for removing the visual studio 2xxx ide projects and stick with cmake. I'd like to use cmake, but it's distressing that it isn't native to any of the OS's we support

Re: [fltk.development] Old FLTK2/Cairo poll Was: Re: Doublebuffering issues and generalthoughtsfromafrustrated long time FLTK user.

2012-04-07 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/07/12 06:07, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: I know that I can get FLTK to build on Windows with gmake by just including a gmake.exe and some Makefiles specific to MS. Could you please tell us what gmake.exe is? Is it GNU make, or is it something else? Sorry, I saw your suggestion

Re: [fltk.development] Old FLTK2/Cairo poll Was: Re:Doublebufferingissues and generalthoughtsfroma frustratedlong time FLTK user.

2012-04-07 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/07/12 07:50, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: On 07.04.2012 15:50, Michael Sweet wrote: Autoconf isn't needed on enduser systems as the configure script is bundled with the tar balls. Oh, right. Thanks for the correction. And look, the GNU autoconf page:

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2681: Fl_Table::scrollbar_size() method needed

2012-04-14 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2681 Version: 1.4-feature Now that we have a way to handle ABI modifications within maintenance releases, this should be revisited. Link:

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2681: Fl_Table::scrollbar_size() method needed

2012-04-14 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR Active] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2681 Version: 1.3-feature Changing this back from a 1.4 RFE to a 1.3 RFE. Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2681 Version: 1.3-feature

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2681: Fl_Table::scrollbar_size() method needed

2012-04-14 Thread Greg Ercolano
[STR Closed w/Resolution] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2681 Version: 1.3-feature Fix Version: 1.3-current (r9345) Fixed in Subversion repository. Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2681 Version: 1.3-feature Fix Version: 1.3-current (r9345)

Re: [fltk.development] Fl_Tree potential enhancement

2012-04-15 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/13/12 22:30, Fabien Costantini wrote: I'd like to add an 'a la mac os x' reselect feature when user clicks 2 times on an item, that was therefore already selected in Fl_Tree. Yes, I think right now the callback is invoked for only these 'reasons':

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2827: Fl_Tree new RESELECT functionality

2012-04-15 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2827 Version: 1.3-feature Fix Version: 1.3-current Great! One comment about the commit: can you double check your tabstops are set to 8 (and not 4). Some weird

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2827: Fl_Tree new RESELECT functionality

2012-04-18 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2827 Version: 1.3-feature Fix Version: 1.3-current Thanks Greg, I re-indexed some sections I got the rest of the indent problems (r9355) and expanded some doxygen

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2827: Fl_Tree new RESELECT functionality

2012-04-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR Pending] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2827 Version: 1.3-feature Fix Version: 1.3-current (r9350) In r9358: Fixed so reselect doesn't affect the 'changed' flag Added an option chooser to test/tree test

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2827: Fl_Tree new RESELECT functionality

2012-04-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR Pending] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2827 Version: 1.3-feature Fix Version: 1.3-current (r9358) Reclosing. Fabien: if you see any trouble with this change, feel free to re-open + change. Link:

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2827: Fl_Tree new RESELECT functionality

2012-04-19 Thread Greg Ercolano
[STR Closed w/Resolution] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2827 Version: 1.3-feature Fix Version: 1.3-current (r9358) Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2827 Version: 1.3-feature Fix Version: 1.3-current (r9358) ___ fltk-dev mailing list

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2799: Menus can suddenly disappear

2012-04-21 Thread Greg Ercolano
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR Pending] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2799 Version: 1.3-feature Not sure if the issue is screen resolution so much as it is mouse resolution, or how many 'mickeys' of mouse movement == noise. Probably

[fltk.development] Some thoughts on STL + libs and ABI issues

2012-04-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
A fascinating thread formed today on a large but private CG mailing list that branched from a discussion on c++11 to STL ABI issues that I found quite interesting, as well as the problems of exposing STL in a lib's API and why that should be avoided.

Re: [fltk.development] New jobs in Jenkins

2012-04-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/23/12 14:57, Matthias Melcher wrote: I added the OS X command line build for FLTK 1.3 to Jenkins. I also added all jobs for FLTK 3.0. http://matthiasm.mooo.com/jenkins Cool! This looks kinda easy to use. I wanted to look at the console output from some of the recent

Re: [fltk.development] New jobs in Jenkins

2012-04-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/23/12 18:22, Greg Ercolano wrote: On 04/23/12 14:57, Matthias Melcher wrote: I added the OS X command line build for FLTK 1.3 to Jenkins. I also added all jobs for FLTK 3.0. http://matthiasm.mooo.com/jenkins [..] Having done [a rebuild] I can now view the console output

Re: [fltk.development] New jobs in Jenkins

2012-04-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/23/12 18:22, Greg Ercolano wrote: On 04/23/12 14:57, Matthias Melcher wrote: I added the OS X command line build for FLTK 1.3 to Jenkins. I also added all jobs for FLTK 3.0. http://matthiasm.mooo.com/jenkins Cool! This looks kinda easy to use. Just did a successful

Re: [fltk.development] New jobs in Jenkins

2012-04-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
Only suggs I can think of so far: o The output of date(1) at top+bottom of console log so we can see start/end build dates in the log itself o The output of 'gcc -v' in the log, so we can see the compiler version o Perhaps a separate

Re: [fltk.development] Can Fl_Text_Display have abackground colorin V1.3

2012-04-24 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/24/12 08:07, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: By using repeated replaces the entire display's colours can be controlled BUT NOT THE BACKGROUND. Why can't each Style_Table_Entry contain background color information somehow? Sorry - it just wasn't designed that way...

Re: [fltk.development] New jobs in Jenkins

2012-04-25 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/25/12 13:42, Matthias Melcher wrote: Also, I got MinGW running. Only caveat: if the script fails, the .BAT still does not fail, hence the result is alway success. Maybe anyone has an idea? Is there a way to see the BAT and SH scripts? Usually it's just a matter of

Re: [fltk.development] New jobs in Jenkins

2012-04-25 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/25/12 16:08, Matthias Melcher wrote: It's currently: C:\MinGW\msys\1.0\bin\sh.exe --login -c ( cd /c/jenkins/workspace/FLTK_1.3_MSVista_MinGW date Hmm, I'd suggest '|| set ERRORLEVEL=1' inside the quotes is the problem; inside the quotes it's being parsed by sh(1)

Re: [fltk.development] New jobs in Jenkins

2012-04-25 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/25/12 17:18, Greg Ercolano wrote: ..where 'your_mingw.sh' might look like: Oops, actually, I'd suggest this instead for the sh script: echo --- GCC VERSION: # show.. gcc --version # ..gcc version info echo --- Started: `date` # show

Re: [fltk.development] New jobs in Jenkins

2012-04-26 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/26/12 01:12, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Also, I got MinGW running. Only caveat: if the script fails, the .BAT still does not fail, hence the result is alway success. Maybe anyone has an idea? I see Greg has some suggestions, but I wonder if we can get away with

Re: [fltk.development] Code::block and make -- howto?

2012-04-27 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/27/12 11:07, STF wrote: autoconf... oh It's been a long time I haven't done C/C++, Unix and similar stuffs... forgot about this autoconf. Anyway, personally, I've never created and used autoconf -- just using the old makefile all the time. It uses autoconf to find out about

Re: [fltk.development] Jenkins lies to me?

2012-04-30 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/30/12 13:44, Matthias Melcher wrote: Oh! Not good! It seems that there is still an issue with returning a failed build on multiple platforms. That really defeats the purpose... Maybe you missed my follow up last week which I think might fix it: * * * It's currently:

Re: [fltk.development] Add background colors to Fl_Text_Display

2012-05-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 05/01/12 12:38, David Currie wrote: On 04/27/12 15:55, David Currie wrote: what is a diff? is it the output from diff original new? A 'diff' is the output of diff(1) comparing the old and new file, eg: diff -u foo.old foo.new The nice thing about a universal diff

Re: [fltk.development] [Library] r9415 - branches/branch-3.0/src/fltk3

2012-05-01 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/30/12 15:44, fltk-dev@easysw.com wrote: Author: matt Date: 2012-04-30 15:44:33 -0700 (Mon, 30 Apr 2012) New Revision: 9415 Log: Genrating a ompilation error so we can test the Jenkins setup You can probably test jenkins for compiler errors by telling it to make a target

[fltk.development] Fl_Scroll: bug with scrollbar visibility on init

2012-05-05 Thread Greg Ercolano
Apparently Fl_Scroll's scrollbars are 'visible()' on construction, ie. they are not hide()en by default. Currently no one sees this problem, because scrollbar visibility is calculated during draw(). But perhaps it would be correct to have the widget initialize itself with the scrollbars

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Measuring text for X11 16-bitcoordinate clipping

2012-05-08 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 05/08/12 05:38, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Second question: What function should be used: fl_measure() or fl_text_extents()? Would there be a performance difference to be expected, or would it only be the small difference in the exact layout? The latter could IMHO be ignored,

Re: [fltk.development] text caret control in Fl_Text_Display

2012-05-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 05/10/12 06:07, David Currie wrote: How does one control the text caret in Fl_Text_Display. I mean the TEXT cursor (caret) not the mouse cursor ? To control its on/off state, show_cursor(1|0), To control its position, insert_position(pos). For the user to move it,

Re: [fltk.development] text caret control in Fl_Text_Display

2012-05-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 05/11/12 06:32, Matthias Melcher wrote: On 11.05.2012, at 03:58, David Currie wrote: On 05/10/12 06:07, David Currie wrote: How does one control the text caret in Fl_Text_Display. I mean the TEXT cursor (caret) not the mouse cursor ? To control its on/off state, show_cursor(1|0),

Re: [fltk.development] text caret control in Fl_Text_Display

2012-05-11 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 05/11/12 10:11, Greg Ercolano wrote: On 05/11/12 06:32, Matthias Melcher wrote: If there's bugs/shortcomings with Fl_Text_Display's caret + keynav, we should probably fix it, so that it can be a fully functional replacement for Fl_Multiline_Output. I did notice

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Fl_Spinner API additions

2012-05-16 Thread Greg Ercolano
Fl_Spinner is a group with an Fl_Input and a few buttons; looks like this: _ | | ^ | | input area |---| |_|_v_| [..] 1) Add a color() method to override the invisible Fl_Group::color(), and have it call the input's

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Fl_Tooltip API additions

2012-05-16 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 05/15/12 04:50, Matthias Melcher wrote: On 15.05.2012, at 11:53, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Curious if there's any objections to adding the following controls to the Fl_Tooltip API. Would like to be able to have more control over global tooltips: // Set/get the

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Fl_Tooltip API additions

2012-05-16 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 05/15/12 04:50, Matthias Melcher wrote: On 15.05.2012, at 11:53, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Curious if there's any objections to adding the following controls to the Fl_Tooltip API. Would like to be able to have more control over global tooltips: // Set/get the

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >