I did, in fact, look at your sources. Not exactly the most unbiased sources
of info on the middle east (yes, even Amnesty International!) in my opinion.
Noam Chomsky?! Oh the pain. But of course I always take as gospel whatever
Ted Koppel says...
well for the sake of credibility why not humor
And what's more wearisome still is using this situation
to propagate anti-Israeli sentiment among the under educated and
ill-informed. Speaking of which, I'm very curious as to the sources of your
FACTs. There are many ways to spin a piece of info, friend, (but clearly
you already have this
terrorist acts EXCEPT ITS OWN, simply only
when it's convienant for them to do and they have been doing this for years.
~jason pierce
some good links for accurate information
http://www.merip.org/palestine-israel_primer/toc-pal-isr-primer.html
http://www.zmag.org/
the Twelve Fate Game is now subtitled in mandarin
http://www.onyxmirr.org/Game.html
~jason
1 [sic]
2 and these mowers [automaton]
3 The sky is an immortal tent built by [marked by fast and nervous]
4 the Spectre and its cruel Shadow. [that are related to the squirls]
5 As to that false appearance which appears (more codons that are genetic nonsense]
6 Moving by compulsion each
if you will note on line 28 of my poem there appears to be a missing
addendum.or one that appears to be not included. it was not intentional.
knowing what sticklers you guys are for addendums i will provide
it now with my most humble apologies
28 To fade away like transient day from her
[sic]
trap poor [fehlerhaft automaton]
Thy transgressions, great and small. [Vermin` derung]
I wandered through each chartered street, [zerstruet`]
Every blackening church appals, [menthol metaphysik]
Has bereaved of their life. [lilliputa`ner milizen]
craving wind attend each night [abhoren
lichtomorph [cumquats]
me likey sue likey, tedious [granny smith apples]
akhenaten no new, no knew [fruit salad]
coup de tete` coup de chapel [insert your own with respect to fresh fuit]
no plainer.not lack (ing) in squid like pathology [mangos]
tedious repetition...with respect to
Jason Pierce did. I would never use the word
daft unless I was making fun of the English.
Here is another quote on our topic (anti-art, not making fun of the English):
his intent is just becoming another spectator thus no authority
on the result (his paintings) of his efforts.
At 4:08 AM -0500 5/30/01, jason pierce wrote:
but, as you said before, the artist's statement is a 'result' as well... why
shouldn't we
concern ourselves with language as an observable
i never suggested that artist have little idea, and even less control of what they
do.
but you interpreted it that waythats what i'm talking about.
more that artist have little idea or control over how it is viewed. or just that intent
is no authority on meaning. obviously M. Duchamp
iieee! did i say preconcieved societal conceptions?
i meant to say societal preconceptions
sorry,
jason
i am responsible for my own actions.
the choice was mine. i didn't foist
responsibility on my friend.
a bogus theory is pure conjecture on your part.
or do you claim to know exactly what every person
is thinking?
or do you have proof that i am the only one
that felt Bennett was posting too
if i'm only seeking attention then why attack me?
you are only encouraging me right? or are you
and deborah just trying to seek attention for yourselves?
jason
At 10:44 PM -0700 5/27/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
if j.pierce is not seeking attention, why seven messages in the space of an
hour?
i
vote, links for everyone
At 03:38 PM 5/27/01 -0500, jason pierce wrote:
that brings up another thing if somebody
wants to publicly post their poetry they
should expect a little negative criticism.
it kind of goes with the territory.
Saying someone's work shouldn't be posted, when they happen
i guess deborah can throw her bogus theory theory
out the window now. i must note that terrence is being
much more tactful than i was, but then he wasn't erroneously
attacked.
i agree with terrence
j
At 10:44 PM -0700 5/27/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 19:25:14 -0700
From:
you are right, i apologise,
though you may never read this.
jason
reply button fever (at least delet irrelevent parts of the original
message!)
someone elses work. in certain situations
harsh criticisms if they are accurate can be very beneficial.
harsh criticism could make Bennett a better artist, who knows?
j
At 11:43 PM -0700 5/26/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
Jason Pierce,
Why you seem so invested in getting your way about this is beyond
i would normally leave but except for a few
things i like the fluxlist. i'm loving it
because it brings up alot of social ideologies
i don't really care how much attention i'm getting.
if i were a spectator in this i would be just as interested
or loving it so to speak.
jason
At 11:43 PM -0700
there
jason
At 11:43 PM -0700 5/26/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 12:13:44 -0600
From: Deborah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: rererere sol
At 01:58 PM 5/26/01 -0500, jason pierce wrote:
fine with me, i was just trying to help out some friends
that were irritated
very similiar to watching the same comercial over
and over.
i feel like i'm taking a test or something, what's with all the
questions i'm getting? is being annoyed by monotony
that difficult to understand?
jason
At 11:43 PM -0700 5/26/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001
i agree with everything josh says or will say on the issue
of anti art.
jason
At 11:43 PM -0700 5/26/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 21:31:07 -0700
From: Josh Ronsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FLUXLIST: RE: Questions (anti-art)
A day after I posted my question, I came
.html
alan bowman writes a fffo announcement
http://www.mail-archive.com/fluxlist@scribble.com/msg05131.html
hello my name is _. I'm new to the list. I have interesting things to
say, which may be found at this link
http://www.mail-archive.com/fluxlist@scribble.com/msg05799.html
jason pierce suggests
that brings up another thing if somebody
wants to publicly post their poetry they
should expect a little negative criticism.
it kind of goes with the territory.
why post it to be left alone? that is the worst
crime in the art world is people leaving things alone.
that is how things get better,
is Deborah so the issue is just subjective conjecture
on her part (and mine as well).
jason pierce
rep. FAPA
Self Defense!!!
j
At 11:33 AM -0700 5/26/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
At 01:29 PM 5/25/01 -0500, you wrote:
my apologies
but i am still going to post mock poetry untill
bennett stops.
Aggression!!!
So much energy focused into the head of a needle for the forcing of one's will.
sigh
Human
carol, get a more origional comeback. j
At 11:33 AM -0700 5/26/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
jason, get a life. c.
fine with me, i was just trying to help out some friends
that were irritated with Bennets poetry bombardment.
j
At 11:33 AM -0700 5/26/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
Dear Jason,
As I said before you've made your point. I'm not going to waste any more of
my time with this issue. If you respond to
with a link, a fluxlister (more notably the digesters) that doesn't want to read it
doesn't have to. and a fluxlister that wants to read it can.
on the digest when bennett post like 3 poems on one digest you
are kind of forced to read it as you scroll down. plus it
just condenses the information.
A) should we have a vote on these issues?
yea for vote
nay for no vote
1) i suggest we have a vote on the whether Bennett
should post his poetry with a link or not issue.
actually lets not just single out bennett what about
links for all aesthetic (mostly poetry) presentation on fluxlist?
yea
[strawberries]
mushu pork [almonds are not fruit]
liggu ligggu shrimp fried rice [pomengranates]
licko licko fundu for the masses [grapes, the seedless variety]
jason pierce
rep Fluxlisters Against Poetry Overload
source)
if he does then i will continue my personal blockading
activities. so it's up to him if he wishes to coninue
this lack of consideration for his feelings. as it was up
to him from the very start. he had all the time in the world
to consider that he may be posting too much poetry.
Jason Pierce
of at least 1 FAPA
member.
Jason Pierce
rep. Fluxlisters Against Poetic Aggression
At 9:42 AM -0700 5/24/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
Hi all,
There have been some complaints about the volume and frequency of John's
posting his work to FLUXLIST and a faction has given him notice and asked
him to cease
to cram
their poetry down your throats if you are stupid enough
to subscibe to the list.
ofcourse fuss can be fun too.
some people owe me one.
jason pierce
rep. Fluxlisters Against Poetic Aggression
At 12:18 PM -0700 5/24/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 12:35:08 +0100
From
Title: Blockade: FAPA response re
aggresion
bloke, poke, stoat
i think that i shall never see a tree as lovely as an
ostrich
in november Bennett pokereprise...anacromagnon ,not a
word
neophyte tourette parting glance. eclipsed in ardorous
crater fixation, meaning in absence of such,
Title: Re:Bennett aggresion
instructions: feel free to copy/paste poem and resubmit 5 times a
week
to FLUXLIST, why bother with comming up with new random words. or
you can
insert your own random phraseology at any point of this
poem. it matters little either way.
bloke, poke, stoat
i think
Title: Fresh fruit re: bennett
agression
fresh fruit addendum [sic]
bloke, poke, stoat [strawberries]
i think that i shall never see a tree as lovely as an ostrich
[pomengranates]
in november Bennett pokereprise...anacromagnon ,not a
word [bannanas]
neophyte tourette parting
i did not intend for this stuff to appear:
At 3:37 PM -0700 5/24/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
divto FLUXLIST, why bother with comming up with new random words. or
you can/div
divinsert your own random phraseology at any point of this/div
divpoem. it matters little either way./div
divbr/div
some people
religiously(?) adhere to and perpetuate it like a crutch thus diminishing it's primary
impact
..with fresh fruit addendum
but that wasn't anywhere near as snappy. maybe i will just go with
a nore simple Blockade with Fresh Fruit Addendum
Jason Pierce
rep. Fluxlisters Against
uuugh! a panda is not a marsupial...
he victors of germany which entually lead to WWII.
so in a way
the english blockade set in motion all the events that lead to Hitlers eventual rise
to power etc.
(see "propaganda" and "the effectiveness of naval blockades")
Jason Pierce
Coordinating Chairman,
Tornament of Blockades Committee
tographs can be sent via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or snail to:
Jason Pierce
5626 woodrow ave #j
Austin, TX 78756
5. contestants may have as many entries as they please
to extract "the big bucks" from a sentimentally
confused
society.
jason pierce
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
i have the photo that solves every single mystery known to man
this photo is the key to the universe.
when i discovered this photo and recognized
it's implications i was bombarded
by various death threats from groups that don't want
this sort of information revealed. i found this photo on some
44 matches
Mail list logo
