nt we have.
Alex
From: Carol Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: wanna see a ridiculous review of a beuys show?
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:51:20 +
hi rod,
good 'ol boys will be good 'ol boys and will
not 'get' joseph beuys.
I've understood Beuys to be this very celebrity: his 'talks' were always
I like america and america likes me.
IST: wanna see a ridiculous review of a beuys show?
Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001, 3:18 PM
http://www.dallasobserver.com/issues/2001-03-15/arts.html
comments, please?
r
--
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! M
hi, meryl:
don't know her qualifications really, but one rarely knows
them anyway unless you're a long time reader of that
person's critiques. the "observer" is a weekly mag that's
akin to something like "the stranger" in seattle or "the
reader" in chicago (and L.A. too, i think), etc. so think
and the whole nation elected the scary
president we have.
Alex
From: Carol Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: wanna see a ridiculous review of a beuys show?
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:51:20 +
hi rod,
good 'ol boys
From: Carol Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW i still don't know where josh ronsen's essay goes from here. and i
enjoyed
your piece very much, afriend wanted to know where you can get the little
box.
bests, carol :)
the box came from this everything's-99-cents store called Zakka that I used
to
http://www.dallasobserver.com/issues/2001-03-15/arts.html
comments, please?
r
--
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
id natural
recations to Beuys' work. Dismissal the lazy way out of doing crtisim.
Alex
From: Rod Stasick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "¬·`" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FLUXLIST: wanna see a ridiculous review of a beuys show?
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 12:18:
my favorite part of the review was putting "conceptual" between quotes.
what does one expect from Bush country? (not to denigrate the texans
on the list, i mean, we new yorkers have censor-happy guiliani to
deal with) - the majority of americans are suspicious of and
generally loath any art
hi rod,
good 'ol boys will be good 'ol boys and will
not 'get' joseph beuys.
after all, look who we have for president.
bests, carol
Rod Stasick wrote:
http://www.dallasobserver.com/issues/2001-03-15/arts.html
comments, please?
r
--
carol starr
taos, new mexico, usa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've understood Beuys to be this very celebrity: his 'talks' were always
illustrated with great flourish on a provided portable green/black-board,
the last marks on which were always preserved with fixative after the
event as a marketable objet d'art, and partially compensated for his big
fees.
--- twhid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my favorite part of the review was putting "conceptual"
between quotes.
yes, that's one of the many...
my beef is that here in dallas there's a lot of bitchin'
and moanin' (usually from critics) about why houston and
even ft. worth get all of the good
She seems to make many errors of fact along with errors of spirit--she
says that Gonzales-Torres "at least went to art school," implying that
Beuys did not, and seems amazed that Beuys had any mastery of
traditional artmaking. Didn't she know that he was Lehmbruck's pupil
and, essentially, his
13 matches
Mail list logo
