Interesting question.
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, scott rigby wrote:
Fluxus work demonstrably influenced many of the
conceptual, performance, and video artists of the 1960s and 1970s. For
many
complex reasons, those influences were rarely acknowledged.
I'm half joking but I am curious why the
Having read it, I think this is funny:
one would purposely wish to overlook prior work that provided part of the
foundation of intellectual development on which one built one's own work.
Rather, the richer and more comprehensive one can make one's foundation,
the stronger one's own
With all due respect, "traditional artworld terms" I would think would
imply
interpretation and sales of art in the fluxus genre as commodities, and
while
sales of objects in the conceptual vein IS now done, many contemporary
galleries
do promote conceptual art sans sales for the love of showing
3 matches
Mail list logo
