Dear Jason,
As I said before you've made your point. I'm not going to waste any more of
my time with this issue. If you respond to any more of John's work in
this manner then as far as I'm concerned you can find another list to be a
nuisance on and I will take the necessary software steps in
hi sol,
i think your post is absolutely fair and i agree with you on this matter. it
is too bad we have to concern ourselves with such things when there are more
fun things to do.
have a fun week-end, it's a holiday here.
bests, carol :)
S.E. Nte wrote:
Dear Jason,
As I said before you've
Hello John,
Thanks very much for your response.
I have to confess, I've nowhere near your knowledge on the topic of Visual
Poetry.
Is there any chance I could get you to define what it is?
I've seen plenty of it, but I would be hard pressed to describe it to
someone who
had never seen
Self Defense!!!
j
At 11:33 AM -0700 5/26/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
At 01:29 PM 5/25/01 -0500, you wrote:
my apologies
but i am still going to post mock poetry untill
bennett stops.
Aggression!!!
So much energy focused into the head of a needle for the forcing of one's will.
sigh
Human
licko licko fundu for the masses [grapes, the seedless variety]
Even though I don't like your recent tirade, I do like this line from one of your
mocking
poems.
Jason Pierce,
Why you seem so invested in getting your way about this is beyond me.
Try to get along with others, have some good manners, or if you can't,
leave and create a stir elsewhere. I don't think anyone likes a bully.
Mick
carol, get a more origional comeback. j
At 11:33 AM -0700 5/26/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
jason, get a life. c.
fine with me, i was just trying to help out some friends
that were irritated with Bennets poetry bombardment.
j
At 11:33 AM -0700 5/26/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
Dear Jason,
As I said before you've made your point. I'm not going to waste any more of
my time with this issue. If you respond to
with a link, a fluxlister (more notably the digesters) that doesn't want to read it
doesn't have to. and a fluxlister that wants to read it can.
on the digest when bennett post like 3 poems on one digest you
are kind of forced to read it as you scroll down. plus it
just condenses the information.
At 01:41 PM 5/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
Self Defense!!!
Another way to truly defend yourself would be to leave. But then, I
suppose, you wouldn't get all this attention.
Keep on keepin' on. You must be loving it!
Deborah
At 01:58 PM 5/26/01 -0500, jason pierce wrote:
fine with me, i was just trying to help out some friends
that were irritated with Bennets poetry bombardment.
YES! You've said it again.
The last bastion of those with no cause. A league of supporters whom no one
knows!
Email lists at their most
A) should we have a vote on these issues?
yea for vote
nay for no vote
1) i suggest we have a vote on the whether Bennett
should post his poetry with a link or not issue.
actually lets not just single out bennett what about
links for all aesthetic (mostly poetry) presentation on fluxlist?
yea
In a message dated 5/26/01 3:06:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on the digest when bennett post like 3 poems on one digest you
are kind of forced to read it as you scroll down. plus it
just condenses the information.
i was not aware that scrolling down was such a
A day after I posted my question, I came across the following passage in
Rationalizing Culture: IRCAM, Boulez and the Institutionalization of the Musical
Avant-Garde by Georgina Born:
However much an avant-garde attempts to produce work that is unclassifiable,
shockingly different, it is a
14 matches
Mail list logo
