(For example)
Try to imagine a system where the parts only receive messages but never
explicitly send them.
This is one example of what I meant when I requested that computer people pay
more attention to what is in between the parts, than to the parts -- the
Japanese have a great short word
On 21/08/2011, at 12:22 AM, John McKeon wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2011, Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com wrote:
(For example)
Try to imagine a system where the parts only receive messages but never
explicitly send them.
This is one example of what I meant when I requested that
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Julian Leviston jul...@leviston.netwrote:
On 21/08/2011, at 12:22 AM, John McKeon wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2011, Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com wrote:
(For example)
Try to imagine a system where the parts only receive messages but never
explicitly
medium ?
(McLuhan notwithstanding...)
On Aug 20, 2011, at 7:22 AM, John McKeon wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2011, Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com wrote:
(For example)
Try to imagine a system where the parts only receive messages but never
explicitly send them.
This is one example
On 8/20/2011 9:25 AM, John McKeon wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Julian Leviston jul...@leviston.net
mailto:jul...@leviston.net wrote:
On 21/08/2011, at 12:22 AM, John McKeon wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2011, Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:25 AM, John McKeon p3ano...@gmail.com wrote:
The other model has the sun pumping out its messages into the ether
to which all objects may (or may not) respond. Much better scaling.
Sounds like you want a publish/subscribe model.
Anyhow, this and your B12 analogy made
