*****SPAM***** Re: Building FOP Trunk with Any - BUILD FAILED

2008-07-16 Thread bonekrusher
Spam detection software, running on the system poa.cs.unibo.it, has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system

Re: Building FOP Trunk with Any - BUILD FAILED

2008-07-16 Thread Peter B. West
Bones wrote: In the end, I got it working by making sure that the build process was using the exact same XML parser and XSLT processor that were distributed with FOP. - How do I do that with in ant? You're doing it. It's controlled by the classpath set up by ant, which looks pretty

Support for XSL-FO 1.1 formatting objects for indexing

2008-07-16 Thread Dave of Siemens
This is my first post. We've been using Apache FOP quite successfully for the past year or so, converting XML for technical manuals to PDF. The one feature that we're anxious to see is indexing support (XSL-FO 1.1, 6.10). Does anyone know if this is being worked on? Thanks, Dave Siemens --

Re: Support for XSL-FO 1.1 formatting objects for indexing

2008-07-16 Thread Chris Bowditch
Dave of Siemens wrote: This is my first post. We've been using Apache FOP quite successfully for the past year or so, converting XML for technical manuals to PDF. The one feature that we're anxious to see is indexing support (XSL-FO 1.1, 6.10). Does anyone know if this is being worked on?

Re: Support for XSL-FO 1.1 formatting objects for indexing

2008-07-16 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On Jul 16, 2008, at 18:45, Chris Bowditch wrote: Dave of Siemens wrote: This is my first post. We've been using Apache FOP quite successfully for the past year or so, converting XML for technical manuals to PDF. The one feature that we're anxious to see is indexing support (XSL-FO 1.1,

Re: Building FOP Trunk with Any - BUILD FAILED

2008-07-16 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On Jul 16, 2008, at 13:00, Bones wrote: Hi Phil My parser/transform environment is the standard which comes with FOP, however when I use FOP for development I also use SAXON for transformation and sometimes pure Sax2 for parsing. It depends. I haven't yet encountered such issues when

Re: Building FOP Trunk with Any - BUILD FAILED

2008-07-16 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On Jul 16, 2008, at 20:41, Bones wrote: Well, I am too. My advise is to put this issue on the the back burner and see if anyone can duplicate the problem. thoughts? Always... :-) If all else fails, I guess we could always send you the pre-generated files, see if that gets you up and

Re: Building FOP Trunk with Any - BUILD FAILED

2008-07-16 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I got lucky!! I didn't really work on this just now but I activated one of my other FOP working copy and had the error Phil reported: C:\Dev\FOP\main\xml-fop-temp\build.xml:353: java.io.IOException: java.io.FileNotFoundException:

Re: Building FOP Trunk with Any - BUILD FAILED

2008-07-16 Thread Peter B. West
Peter B. West wrote: Bones wrote: In the end, I got it working by making sure that the build process was using the exact same XML parser and XSLT processor that were distributed with FOP. - How do I do that with in ant? You're doing it. It's controlled by the classpath set up by ant,

Re: Building FOP Trunk with Any - BUILD FAILED

2008-07-16 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On Jul 16, 2008, at 22:21, Jeremias Maerki wrote: I got lucky!! I didn't really work on this just now but I activated one of my other FOP working copy and had the error Phil reported: snip / I wonder why I didn't run into this sooner. I always build FOP with FOP 1.4.2_16 with no