On 12.05.2005 22:00:54 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
snip/
I get carried away sometimes :-)
Happens to me all the time. This stuff gets so complicated.
snip/
I can see the potential benefit by not having to take all the
influencing border sources into account, but precalculating some border
On 13.05.2005 18:01:44 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
snip/
if you would like to take a stab at the collapsed border
resolution, then please do. I'll leave it aside for the moment and will
concentrate on implementing or fixing the rest of the important features
for table layout (BPD/height
On 11.05.2005 00:52:21 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
snip/
Jeremias, what do you mean with complexity in certain areas? Tables
only, or are there other complexities that you perceived as
overwhelming?
No, it's mainly the complexity of the collapsed border model ...
Yes, I've been
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm not where I would like to be, yet (with table layout). Over all,
there is still a number of problems to be solved. These are (potentially
incomplete list):
- Table layout including header, footer, spans and borders (*)
- Markers
- before-floats and footnotes
- keeps and
I'm not where I would like to be, yet (with table layout). Over all,
there is still a number of problems to be solved. These are (potentially
incomplete list):
- Table layout including header, footer, spans and borders (*)
- Markers
- before-floats and footnotes
- keeps and breaks on tables
-
On 10.05.2005 20:41:19 Simon Pepping wrote:
My worry with the new approach is performance: We know that the
algorithms require quite some computational steps, but we have no idea
whether in the end performance on a large document will be acceptable
or not. (Perhaps Luca has some experimental
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10.05.2005 20:41:19 Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi guys,
For starters: my vote is +1.
I agree with Simon, and also very much feel like we're on the right track
with this. Sure, it will *still* take some work...
snip /
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Still, we're at a point where we should finally say yes or no to further
pursuing the new page breaking approach. Merging the branch back into
HEAD means a step back for a few features and on the other side a step
forward especially for keeps. I got the impression that the
