Hi,
Manuel Mall a écrit :
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 02:58, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip/
Interestingly Java 1.5 has added the Integer.valueOf(int) method with
the following comment:
Flyweight pattern. That's what I was looking for before replying to
Andreas' commit, and I was surprised to
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Shall we launch a poll on fop-user about abandoning support for 1.4 and
require 1.5 as a minimum? :-]
A poll: maybe. Abandoning 1.3: Not yet.
If the usage of those hash maps is only in a few places, we could
provide JDK dependent code and tell people that FOP runs
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi,
Manuel Mall a écrit :
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 02:58, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip/
Interestingly Java 1.5 has added the Integer.valueOf(int) method with
the following comment:
Flyweight pattern. That's what I was looking for before replying to
Andreas'
On Jul 18, 2007, at 14:28, Peter B. West wrote:
Hi Peter
alt-design always cached _all_ the Integer instances it needed.
Another
startling new idea.
FWIW, I did not presume my idea to be startling or new. Just was a
bit bugged by the number of places in the current trunk where
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Shall we launch a poll on fop-user about abandoning support for 1.4 and
require 1.5 as a minimum? :-]
A poll: maybe. Abandoning 1.3: Not yet.
If the usage of those hash maps is only in a few places, we could
provide JDK dependent code and tell
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Shall we launch a poll on fop-user about abandoning support for 1.4 and
require 1.5 as a minimum? :-]
A poll: maybe. Abandoning 1.3: Not yet.
Did you mean 1.4 here? I thought we had all agreed to drop support for
1.3 now? I have long argued
On Jul 16, 2007, at 22:25, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Addition of a general-purpose int-to-int map ...
...
This change makes me a bit uneasy. No doubt that this class is clever
and efficient and working, but that's something more to maintain.
Jakarta Commons Collections
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 02:58, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Jul 16, 2007, at 22:25, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Addition of a general-purpose int-to-int map ...
...
As to the efficiency:
I did some measurements of the difference in processing speed (for
64K
/src/java/org/apache/fop/util/IntMap.java (with
props)
This change makes me a bit uneasy. No doubt that this class is clever
and efficient and working, but that's something more to maintain. By
quickly looking at it I couldn't figure out exactly how it is working,
and this is the kind of code
On Jul 16, 2007, at 16:38, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi
This change makes me a bit uneasy. No doubt that this class is clever
and efficient and working, but that's something more to maintain. By
quickly looking at it I couldn't figure out exactly how it is working,
and this is the kind of code
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Addition of a general-purpose int-to-int map ...
...
This change makes me a bit uneasy. No doubt that this class is clever
and efficient and working, but that's something more to maintain.
Jakarta Commons Collections has all kind of clever implementation.
Don't they
11 matches
Mail list logo
