off the content, etc).
I suppose one could cheat by adding a blank last page ;) But I imagine the
user would be pretty upset by that...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/XSL-FO-2.0-workshop-in-Heidelberg-next-week-tf2408511.html#a6751725
Sent from the FOP - Dev mailing list
Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
If anyone has any requirements for XSL-FO 2.0 which I should bring up at
the workshop in Heidelberg next week, please let me know. Deadline
2006-10-16 so I have time to prepare.
Jörg's comments just reminded me of something I think is missing in the
current spec:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
If anyone has any requirements for XSL-FO 2.0 which I should bring up at
the workshop in Heidelberg next week, please let me know. Deadline
2006-10-16 so I have time to prepare.
Luca, are you going, too? How do you travel?
Yes, I'm going.
I think I'll travel by train,
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 11:45:08PM +0200, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
If anyone has any requirements for XSL-FO 2.0 which I should bring up at
the workshop in Heidelberg next week, please let me know.
More radical thoughts:
- Deprecate mixing inlines and blocks :-P
Block
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 12:42 +0200, Simon Pepping wrote:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 11:45:08PM +0200, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
If anyone has any requirements for XSL-FO 2.0 which I should bring up at
the workshop in Heidelberg next week, please let me know.
More radical
Simon Pepping wrote:
Block content in inline content is the natural organization of
displayed formulas and tables. Demanding that FO generating
stylesheets separate them is moving the burden back to them. I am not
in favour of that.
Ah, I start seeing the point. You might have add images as
If anyone has any requirements for XSL-FO 2.0 which I should bring up at
the workshop in Heidelberg next week, please let me know. Deadline
2006-10-16 so I have time to prepare.
Luca, are you going, too? How do you travel?
Jeremias Maerki
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
If anyone has any requirements for XSL-FO 2.0 which I should bring up at
the workshop in Heidelberg next week, please let me know.
Some rough ideas, unpolished, and without even having had a look at
both 1.1 and the current 2.0 proposals:
- Generalize headers/footers for
, would be ideal.
* Please give us a RELAX NG+Schematron schema for XSL-FO. It would be so
incredibly useful to have such a thing.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/XSL-FO-2.0-workshop-in-Heidelberg-next-week-tf2408511.html#a6727041
Sent from the FOP - Dev mailing list
