Nested, multi-page tables and keep-with-previous

2008-05-02 Thread torsten.blix
Hi, I have a problem with the XSL-FO listed below - sorry for the lengthy example, I tried to cut it down as much as possible (and hope that Outlook doesn't make too much of a mess of it). Running FOP 0.95beta from the command line and producing a PDF output, I get no warnings/errors and the

Re: Nested, multi-page tables and keep-with-previous

2008-05-02 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On May 2, 2008, at 10:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I have a problem with the XSL-FO listed below - sorry for the lengthy example, I tried to cut it down as much as possible (and hope that Outlook doesn't make too much of a mess of it). No problem. It came through

Re: Nested, multi-page tables and keep-with-previous

2008-05-02 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Torsten, Torsten Blix wrote: Hi, I have a problem with the XSL-FO listed below - sorry for the lengthy example, I tried to cut it down as much as possible (and hope that Outlook doesn't make too much of a mess of it). FYI you can provide the FO file as an attachment. Actually this is

Re: Nested, multi-page tables and keep-with-previous

2008-05-02 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On May 2, 2008, at 11:30, Vincent Hennebert wrote: This is bug #44621 [1] (more precisely, comment #2). Assertions aren’t enabled by default, otherwise you would have had an AssertionError. It appears that FOP terminates normally but the generated PDF is obviously wrong. It is fixed in the

Re: Nested, multi-page tables and keep-with-previous

2008-05-02 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Andreas Delmelle wrote: On May 2, 2008, at 11:30, Vincent Hennebert wrote: This is bug #44621 [1] (more precisely, comment #2). Assertions aren’t enabled by default, otherwise you would have had an AssertionError. It appears that FOP terminates normally but the generated PDF is obviously

AW: Nested, multi-page tables and keep-with-previous

2008-05-02 Thread torsten.blix
On May 2, 2008, at 11:41, Andreas Delmelle wrote: On May 2, 2008, at 11:30, Vincent Hennebert wrote: This is bug #44621 [1] (more precisely, comment #2). Assertions aren't enabled by default, otherwise you would have had an AssertionError. It appears that FOP terminates normally but the