Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote:
What I'd expect if I had deleted a file from the file system without
doing a fossil rm is that a fossil update would simply assuming that
it was missing and restore it. This is what CVS and SVN do, and I can't
see any reason why a DVCS should be different in
Well, revert could still be used for reverting selected files but update should
also revert any missing files - that's how SCMs have worked.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Cowgar jer...@cowgar.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Dec 16, 2009 9:07 am
Subject: Re:
2 matches
Mail list logo
