I would be very interested to know what header file changes you had to
make...
No header files from fossil.
Some of the gcc header files don't fit to my system. Nothing really important
but the compile failed.
Regards
Hein
Am 02.04.2010 16:07, schrieb D. Richard Hipp:
On Apr 2, 2010,
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
I argue that abandoned branches are part of the historical record and
ought to be preserved. Fossil does distinguish between Open and
Closed branches. The user interface currently displays all branches
on the same page, but if it got to be a
On Sun, April 4, 2010 at 3:33 pm, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
I argue that abandoned branches are part of the historical record and
ought to be preserved. Fossil does distinguish between Open and
Closed branches. The user interface
On 04/04/2010 01:40 PM, Eric wrote:
As for the case of removing illegal insertions, I think it is far better
to have the real history saying we had these from this date to that date,
as you can see, but you can also see that they were removed at a
particular time and not used thereafter.
That
I created a new branch on as 0.2.0. I then however, realized I goofed. I
wanted the branch to be 0.2. I would later create a tag for the 0.2.0
release of the 0.2 branch (expecting 0.2.1, 0.2.3, etc... which would
all be tags in the 0.2 branch).
So I edited it via the web UI. This, however,
5 matches
Mail list logo
