I recall reading somewhere (can't seem to find it at the moment) that
fossil is a serverless, zero-administration program. Is that true of git
also? Thanks.
--Russ P.
--
http://RussP.us
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:13:43 -0700
Russ Paielli russ.paie...@gmail.com wrote:
I recall reading somewhere (can't seem to find it at the moment) that
fossil is a serverless, zero-administration program. Is that true
of git also? Thanks.
Depends on how you define serverless.
Any distributed SCM
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Russ Paielli russ.paie...@gmail.comwrote:
I recall reading somewhere (can't seem to find it at the moment) that
fossil is a serverless, zero-administration program. Is that true of git
also? Thanks.
We make that claim about the SQLite database engine. See
Hi,
I'm quite new to fossil and have some experience only with subversion. I've
setup a little test system to check out if I can implement fossil into our
workflow.
I've a windows 2003 server where I've created a repository folder and I've
have all the development files in a separate folder on
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Tommaso D'Argenio ping...@gmail.comwrote:
Problem is that once I go on the server, while the repository file is
updated (check date/time above) the actual text file in the development
folder
is untouched and still the original version when it was created in
Hi Richard,
thanks for your fast response.
I got that, but then there is something I don't quite understand.
In a normal scenario I would have a development server (call it remote
machine), on which I have one repository for each of the application the
team develops. Each repository have
Hello Tommaso,
For instance, I have a repository with SVN on the remote machine. I make
some changes on my local repository (after the update done locally to
incorporate changes made by other), and using TortoiseSVN I commit the
changes and solve eventual conflicts with a merge. When this is
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:20:12 +0100
Tommaso D'Argenio ping...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Now think at this as a web development team, so we have a web
application which doesn't need to be build or anything like that. The
dev team create a new patch on their local repository and commit it
to the
Hi,
I don't maintain the SVN server so I can't comment on the way it's
configured.
My workflow is quite simple:
-Create a folder on my laptop
-Right click on the folder Tortoise Checkout and enter the repository
URL
-at this point all files get downloaded
-modify few things
-Right click on the
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Tommaso D'Argenio ping...@gmail.comwrote:
The dev guy doesn't have the permission to log on the remote machine and
manually run a fossil update, neither I can think of a process on the
remote machine that run the fossil update command every second.
If it
On 09/13/12 16:02, Richard Hipp wrote:
Is there any reason to try to keep Fossil working on windows9x?
I don't think much Win9x development goes on today. But even if I'm
wrong, I would guess that the intersection between the sets Win9X
developers and Fossil users is roughly empty.
Tag
Even if someone is still supporting Win9X, it does not necessarily follow
that they are doing anything more that testing binaries in that
environment. I would not be heartbroken if such support were removed.
SDR
On Sep 13, 2012 8:25 AM, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Tommaso D'Argenio ping...@gmail.comwrote:
just to add to this. I've set the remote-url with the correct server url
and a user with developer permissions (at later stage I've also added admin
and setup permissions, thinking that developer wasn't enough but no
On 13/09/2012, at 9:02 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Is there any reason to try to keep Fossil working on windows9x?
Only if you are a technonecrophiliac
Steve
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:04:58 +0100
Tommaso D'Argenio ping...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way I've also checked the autosync setting and it is set to
ON, on both machines. Reading from the documentation
[...]
just to add to this. I've set the remote-url with the correct server
url and a user
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:57:03 +0100
Tommaso D'Argenio ping...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't maintain the SVN server so I can't comment on the way it's
configured.
That's probably important -- see below.
My workflow is quite simple:
[...]
-Right click on the folder Tortoise Commit and enter
I'm using fossil 1.23 on Windows 7. I'm attempting to store text files
generated by Microsoft SQL Server 2012 in fossil so I can easily track
their changes over time.
The problem is that fossil thinks these generated text files are binary
data which prevents me from viewing the files via the web
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Greiner grein...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using fossil 1.23 on Windows 7. I'm attempting to store text files
generated by Microsoft SQL Server 2012 in fossil so I can easily track
their changes over time.
The problem is that fossil thinks these generated
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
The file itself appears to be in utf16le. The diff facilities in Fossil
currently only know how to deal with utf8.
Thanks, that was helpful. Turns out I was piping the output through another
utility (powershell) that was
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Greiner grein...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using fossil 1.23 on Windows 7. I'm attempting to store text files
generated by Microsoft SQL Server 2012 in fossil so I can easily track
their
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:43:16PM -0400, Kevin Greiner wrote:
I'm using fossil 1.23 on Windows 7. I'm attempting to store text files
generated by Microsoft SQL Server 2012 in fossil so I can easily track
their changes over time.
The problem is that fossil thinks these generated text files
I'd like to assist with that contribution. Assuming someone hasn't already
done it by the time I click send. :)
SDR
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:43 PM,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Greiner grein...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using fossil 1.23 on Windows 7. I'm attempting to store text files
On 13/09/12 21:08, Richard Hipp wrote:
[...]
Basically, we need a routine that converts an in-memory buffer from
UTF16 to UTF8, and leaves anything that isn't UTF16 unchanged. Then we
need to call that routine in a few strategic places inside of Fossil
Could you clarify what you mean by
OK, so apparently I misunderstood in thinking that the serverless,
zero-administration claim applies to Fossil. Thanks for the clarification.
If it were true, and if it distinguished Fossil from Git, I would have used
it in my advocacy of Fossil.
I am sold on the idea that Fossil is superior to
I assumed (dangerous though it may be) that leaves anything that isn't
UTF-16 unchanged meant don't convert any buffer to UTF-8 if the
origination buffer is not UTF-16.
SDR
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:04 PM, David Given d...@cowlark.com wrote:
On 13/09/12 21:08, Richard Hipp wrote:
[...]
You assume correctly.
The use of iconv won't do, though, since everything also needs to work on
Unix. There are small, portable conversion routines in SQLite that you can
copy.
D. Richard Hipp - d...@sqlite.org
Sent from phone - pardon brevity
On Sep 13, 2012 7:44 PM, Scott Robison
So I've spent some time writing a small and I think portable routine to
detect if a buffer is a valid UTF-16 (either little or big endian). It
rejects buffers if they contain an odd number of bytes or contain any of
the 66 non-character code-points or have invalid surrogate usage. While
this seems
28 matches
Mail list logo
