Re: [fossil-users] Adding attachments via the command line

2016-01-04 Thread David Vines
On 04/01/2016 12:21, Stephan Beal wrote: fossil att[achment] add ... If it's a subcommand of "wiki" then the ability to use any unique short form of it doesn't come for free (that only works for top-level commands). :-? I was unaware of this capability, and it makes sense to me. The

Re: [fossil-users] Adding attachments via the command line

2016-01-04 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 11:31 AM, David Vines wrote: > I now have a prototype for command line access to add attachments to wiki > pages and tech notes. I'd like to ask for any feedback on the command > itself before I polish my changes and put the changes up for review:

Re: [fossil-users] Versions & manifests

2016-01-04 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 04/01/16 08:18, Steve Stefanovich wrote: > Would it be too difficult to put the branch tag (i.e the tag with asterisk > from 'fossil br li' output) in the first line of manifest.tags? It probably wouldn't, but I've been trying to keep the code agnostic with regards to being used in a

Re: [fossil-users] Adding attachments via the command line

2016-01-04 Thread David Vines
On 04/01/2016 14:07, John P. Rouillard wrote: In message <568a7b26.7020...@zombi.eclipse.co.uk>, David Vines writes: On 04/01/2016 12:21, Stephan Beal wrote: fossil att[achment] add ... If it's a subcommand of "wiki" then the ability to use any unique short form of it doesn't come for free