Re: [fossil-users] [GitLab, Inc.] Update: GitLab v. Fossil. Was: Eric Raymond (a.k.a. ESR) has published an SCM

On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:33:02 + "Matija Čupić (GitLab, Inc.)" wrote: > > > > http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=7448 > > > > http://www.catb.org/esr/src/ > > > > > > Thanks for pointing this out, Stephan. > > > > > > What intrigues me most here is not ESR's python-script

Re: [fossil-users] GitLab v. Fossil. Was: Eric Raymond (a.k.a. ESR) has published an SCM

On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:18:08 -0400 Richard Hipp wrote: > > http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=7448 > > http://www.catb.org/esr/src/ > > Thanks for pointing this out, Stephan. > > What intrigues me most here is not ESR's python-script wrapper around > RCS/SCCS, but rather the GitLab

Re: [fossil-users] Git just got shallow and sparse clones

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:00:54 -0700 Warren Young wrote: > https://developers.slashdot.org/story/17/02/03/1427213/microsoft-introduces-gvfs-git-virtual-file-system Care to elaborate a bit? commit 016e6ccbe03438454777e43dd73d67844296a3fd Author: Johannes Schindelin

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on HN

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:49:55 -0300 Richie Adler wrote: [...] > Fossil is a perfect example of an excuse that has to die. *Nobody* > has the excuse that version control is costly or complicated anymore. > You don't even need to create an account in Github. So, do you

Re: [fossil-users] Files named "AUX" on Windows

On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:37:23 -0600 Warren Young wrote: [...] > 2. Contrast almost every Unix system, where the only illegal > character in a file name is the forward slash. ...and NUL, I beleive. [...] ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Sing a song of praise for git {retch}

On Wed, 18 May 2016 13:12:30 -0600 Scott Robison wrote: [...] > Yes, I dislike git (though TortoiseGit makes it a lot more > tolerable). I don't blame guns when people get shot, or knives when > people get stabbed, or cars or alcohol when someone dies in a drunk >

Re: [fossil-users] Conversation with a CM guy

On Mon, 16 May 2016 23:06:59 -0500 Andy Goth wrote: > > He said he thinks he'll go with Git instead because that would give > > the engineers working under him more forward mobility when they > > eventually move on to other companies, whereas Fossil is unknown > > and

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil discussion over at HN

On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:58:45 -0400 Richard Hipp wrote: > > To recap, centralization has both its pros and cons, and this has > > nothing to do with particulars of DVCSes. > > No, the DVCS does impact on this. > > You can self-host using Git just as you can with Fossil. The

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil discussion over at HN

On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:34:34 -0400 Richard Hipp wrote: > GitHub has apparently suffered another outage. Fossil comes up a lot > in the resulting discussion over on Hacker News > (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11428776). I didn't read it > all, but most comments seem

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil mentioned on HN

On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:28:39 -0700 Scott Robison wrote: [...] > I realize that 'get rebase -i' gives a lot more tools, but couldn't > 99% of rebase use cases be handled with private branches? `git rebase` is about rewriting history. It has several modes of operation

Re: [fossil-users] Is fossil export known to be broken?

On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 08:42:48 -0500 Richard Hipp wrote: > > It seems that somebody else ran into this at the start of the year: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg19238.html > Yeah, that's a bummer. > > Part of the problem stems from the fact

Re: [fossil-users] VCS Theory

On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:51:41 -0800 Scott Doctor wrote: > I am looking for information about the theory of VCS that is > being used for systems such as Fossil, Git... Not so much the > how-to-use, but the concepts and issues. > > Any suggestions of either links to

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:53:52 +0100 Stephan Beal wrote: > > Unless you delete .git your checkout is always in well defined > > state. > No, it's not. i once literally had one of the libgit maintainers at > my desk for a full hour trying to get my repo (of a project we were

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:56:48 -0700 Scott Doctor wrote: > That is my experience with all VCS systems. Even with fossil, I > am having trouble justifying why the hassle is worth the effort. I'm honestly not flame-baiting but have you tried to come up with an interface

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:29:15 -0400 Ron W wrote: [...] > Personally, I would find some kind of relative specification more > useful. For example, if I could say "fossil gdiff --from cur-3" and > get a diff between the current check out and the revision 3 commits > before the

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil NetBSD

On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:38:10 +0200 Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: recently I moved from Linux to Free/PC-BSD, but consider to switch to NetBSD. I recall there was talk in the past about possible migration of NetBSD project to Fossil DVCS. There are some Fossil repos available like e.g.

Re: [fossil-users] please compile official fossil builds with https support

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:42:41 -0400 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 6/10/15, Eric Rubin-Smith eas@gmail.com wrote: I believe you should be able to say: # apt-get install libssl-dev That seemed to work. Thanks. I can now do the build with ./configure --static

Re: [fossil-users] Curses! (foiled again?)

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:54:25 +0200 Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: MUCH easier than curses, it would seem, and a wider range of display colors. Isn't as portable, but it only needs to be portable to Unix platforms. I plan to possibly use it with Go (language). FWIW, there's a popular

Re: [fossil-users] Scripting in Fossil v2

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:03:09 +0200 j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: [...] While the Lua scripting enabled me to gain a level of sophistication and relative rigor in the process more than what I could get from normal UNIX plumbing, if my project wasn’t in Lua in the first

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:01:02 -0700 (PDT) Clark Christensen cdcmi...@yahoo.com wrote: [...] Scripting language: I understand the Tcl roots, and I hope you would consider Javascript as a target.  JS seems more universal these days. [...] Please, don't. JS is a wart right from the start --

Re: [fossil-users] how to branch

On 13 May 2013 23:42:46 -0600 Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: That is, it's backwards: you first do some work, then decide to commit and decide this commit should start its own branch rather than continuing the current one, so you create that new branch while

Re: [fossil-users] how to branch

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:55:56AM +, varro wrote: I've been experimenting with fossil for some private projects of mine and now want to use the 'branch' facility. According to the 'help' text for 'branch', the syntax to create a new branch is: fossil branch new BRANCH-NAME BASIS

Re: [fossil-users] Question about Source forge Fossil hosting

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:10:48 -0400 jim Schimpf jim.schi...@gmail.com wrote: I have used Chiselapp for hosting some Fossil project but just got a note that he is shutting down May first. So I decided to try the source forge version (http://fossilrepos.sourceforge.net/) . I'd like to

Re: [fossil-users] Unable to install fossil 1.23+ on my webhost

On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:54:10AM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: I think I found the problem. I'm getting the following error when I try to visit a fossil with version 1.23 and the config I mentioned earlier: [Sat Mar 09 03:08:46 2013] [error] [client 24.200.115.71]

Re: [fossil-users] Making the go tool support fossil

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:28:52 +0100 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote: [...] That's correct, but Lluis is right in suggesting that we should have a command like: fossil ping repo-address which can piggyback on the protocols supported by cloning (ssh/http [s]), but:

Re: [fossil-users] Making the go tool support fossil

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:22:00PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: [...] stephan@tiny:~/cvs/fossil/fossil/src$ wget -q -O /dev/stdout http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/json/HAI | grep -q 'timestamp:' echo OK || echo NOK NOK [...] Thank you, I didn't know this. But again, this

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:27:17PM +0100, Jan Danielsson wrote: 1. Visual Studio is not in my PATH, but the following cmd seems to have tried and failed? Don't start a normal cmd.exe; start the Start Visual Studio Command Line (don't remember the exact title, but you'll find it easily

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:47:59AM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: 1. Visual Studio is not in my PATH, but the following cmd seems to have tried and failed? Don't start a normal cmd.exe; start the Start Visual Studio Command Line (don't remember the exact title, but you'll find

Re: [fossil-users] Right way to try something new and save/revert?

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:06:17 +0100 Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: Am I correct in understanding that this is the right way to proceed to try some new code, and either save it (whether it works or not, just as a track-record) or discard it? So the right way to experiment and keep tried

Re: [fossil-users] Right way to try something new and save/revert?

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:11:44 +0100 Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: Fire up Fossil web UI and click on the links marked patch and diff in the commit view. This is really what I want to do: Being able to see all the things I tried on a file in the branch. Most of the time, I want to keep

Re: [fossil-users] Right way to try something new and save/revert?

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:25:24 +0100 Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: [...] What I'm driving at: 1. Keep tried but NOK algos in a branch called eg. experimental 2. Find a simple way to locate old algo's I know I tried before by searching Fossil, regardless of which branch they are (trunk or

Re: [fossil-users] Right way to try something new and save/revert?

On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:10:35 +0100 Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: Am I correct in understanding that this is the right way to proceed to try some new code, and either save it (whether it works or not, just as a track-record) or discard it? To try some new code: 1. Commit current code

Re: [fossil-users] [VB.Net] Ignoring .suo safe?

On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:49:52AM +0100, Gilles wrote: I just ran the following two commands: fossil add ./MyVBNetProject fossil commit -m Original files ... and fossil complains with: ./MyVBNetProject/WindowsApplication1/WindowsApplication1.suo contains binary data. commit anyhow

Re: [fossil-users] [VB.Net] Ignoring .suo safe?

On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:32:43PM +0100, Gilles wrote: Yes, it's safe. Basically, the only set of files really needed for maintaining a .NET project by the Microsoft IDE are those containing XML in them. The `msbuild` tool which does actual heavy lifting consumes files ending in '*.proj'

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:20:32 +0100 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote: Top post due to... okay. The last three messages to this thread look somewhat alarming. In the first message of these, Mike Meyer, first ruled out the whole tool (Git) due to hating its optional feature and then

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 10:24:05 -0600 Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: In the first message of these, Mike Meyer, first ruled out the whole tool (Git) due to hating its optional feature If you're going quote someone out of context, at least get their reasons right. You called rebase a

Re: [fossil-users] Building Windows binary with SSL support

On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:18:53PM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote: I just started playing with fossil, but the lack of client SSL/TLS support in the official binaries is a pretty major bump in the road for production use. I've read all the topics that I could find on this subject, and I

[fossil-users] Trunk not buildable with MSVC 6.0 (was: Fossil version 1.25 scheduled.)

On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:16:01 -0500 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I have put up a change log for Fossil version 1.25 with a tentative release date of 2012-12-19 http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/changes.wiki There has been a *lot* of change since 1.24. Please test

Re: [fossil-users] Is there a setting to make fossil handle UTF-8 correctly in file names and folder names?

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 02:56:09PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: Is this a configuration issue? Or can fossil not handle special characters in file and folder names? Fossil is suppose to handle non-ASCII characters in filenames correctly. If it does not, that is a bug. What version of

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:28:00PM -0700, Russ Paielli wrote: OK, so apparently I misunderstood in thinking that the serverless, zero-administration claim applies to Fossil. Thanks for the clarification. If it were true, and if it distinguished Fossil from Git, I would have used it in my

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:13:43 -0700 Russ Paielli russ.paie...@gmail.com wrote: I recall reading somewhere (can't seem to find it at the moment) that fossil is a serverless, zero-administration program. Is that true of git also? Thanks. Depends on how you define serverless. Any distributed SCM

Re: [fossil-users] new files or modified files don't get updated on the remote server file system

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:20:12 +0100 Tommaso D'Argenio ping...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Now think at this as a web development team, so we have a web application which doesn't need to be build or anything like that. The dev team create a new patch on their local repository and commit it to the

Re: [fossil-users] new files or modified files don't get updated on the remote server file system

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:04:58 +0100 Tommaso D'Argenio ping...@gmail.com wrote: By the way I've also checked the autosync setting and it is set to ON, on both machines. Reading from the documentation [...] just to add to this. I've set the remote-url with the correct server url and a user

Re: [fossil-users] new files or modified files don't get updated on the remote server file system

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:57:03 +0100 Tommaso D'Argenio ping...@gmail.com wrote: I don't maintain the SVN server so I can't comment on the way it's configured. That's probably important -- see below. My workflow is quite simple: [...] -Right click on the folder Tortoise Commit and enter

Re: [fossil-users] trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:43:16PM -0400, Kevin Greiner wrote: I'm using fossil 1.23 on Windows 7. I'm attempting to store text files generated by Microsoft SQL Server 2012 in fossil so I can easily track their changes over time. The problem is that fossil thinks these generated text files

Re: [fossil-users] Something like rollback

On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:13:38 -0400 Simon Tremblay stm...@hotmail.com wrote: On 8/15/12 12:21 PM, Nick Zalutskiy wrote: Ideally I'd like to revert that commit somehow and do two smaller commits thereafter. Since there is no rewriting history in fossil, I assume that this would involve doing

[fossil-users] Error building Fossil v1.23 against SQLite v3.7.3

I'm trying to build Fossil v1.23 for Debian Lenny using $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/bin --disable-internal-sqlite and I'm getting these linkage errors: /usr/local/src/fossil/./src/db.c:1032: undefined reference to `sqlite3_db_readonly' bld/report.o: In function `sqlite3_exec_readonly':

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 12:19:01 +0200 Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote: Why markdown and not one of the dozens of other wiki syntaxes? Because markdown is a very popular one, used by github, and we have on board the creator of a major implementation (the one used by github, iirc).

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:06:45 +0200 Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Stackoverflow and all the sites under its umbrella, and all the sites using this engine, use (modified) markdown syntax [1], [2]. So again a somewhat slightly incompatible variation. Correct, but I hardly

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 14:02:38 +0200 Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.eu wrote: [...] As I have said elsewhere, I'm not clever enough to imagine a solution to introduce markdown into fossil's internal wiki. So I don't propose it. I propose the extra embedded doc rendering, and the tools to

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:42:05 +0200 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: I do understand the rationale for this approach; if I were the author of Fossil (I'm incapable for this, but let's pretend I am, for the moment) I'd probably pick the same approach during an early phase of

[fossil-users] How to enable showing timeline timestamps using local time without touching the web UI?

I use fossil to manage configuration files of certain programs on a bunch of machines which I access over SSH. I'd like to enable displaying timeline timestamps using local time as there are no people in other time zones working with these projects and hence seeing immediately understandable

[fossil-users] How to reverse a committed changeset in Fossil?

Is there a way to reverse a committed changeset in Fossil? I mean, I have a timeline ...-A-B-C and would like to reverse a change introduced by B. This logically amounts to generating a patch B introduced then trying to reverse-apply it onto C (what would `patch -R ...` do). In Git, I would do

Re: [fossil-users] How to reverse a committed changeset in Fossil?

On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 06:26:21 -0700 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Is there a way to reverse a committed changeset in Fossil? I mean, I have a timeline ...-A-B-C and would like to reverse a change introduced by B. This logically amounts to generating a patch B introduced then

Re: [fossil-users] Security of Fossil

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:56:15PM -0500, Thomas Stover wrote: By my second question, I meant Fossil's Administrator account, not that of windows. Assuming that I don't find a solution for people brute-forcing passwords for regular accounts, that's not a big deal. However, if people can

Re: [fossil-users] Hmm

On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:41:16 +0200 Sander Reiche sander.rei...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe I'm missing something like a magic argument to 'fossil add', but this is not an error I'd like to see on a source control program supported on a UNIX platform :) fossil: filename contains illegal

Re: [fossil-users] can a repo be local and global?

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:49:12 +0200 ST smn...@gmail.com wrote: can a repo be local and global at the same time, i.e. if I want to provide access to my repo through apache - do I need to have one repo for apache and one local or can it be one and the same repo? It can: you do this every time you

Re: [fossil-users] moving repository

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:30:55 -0400 Altu Faltu altufa...@mail.com wrote: Is following sequence supposed to work for moving repository? C:\testfossil new test.fsl C:\testfossil open test.fsl C:\testren test.fsl new.fsl C:\testfossil test-move-repository new.fsl C:\test\fossil.exe:

Re: [fossil-users] moving repository

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:08:58 -0500 Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.com wrote: [...] C:\testfossil test-move-repository c:\test\new.fsl C:\test\fossil.exe: repository does not exist or is in an unreadable directory: C:/test/test.fsl C:\testfossil version This is fossil version

Re: [fossil-users] Side-by-side with checked out content

On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:37:37 +0100 Jos Groot Lipman donts...@home.nl wrote: Is it possible to see a side-by-side difference between the last checkin and the currently changed file on disk? It would be a great alternative to fossil diff and fossil gdiff This would be much like the wiki

Re: [fossil-users] ASCII filename issue

On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:21:14 +0200 Ștefan Fulea fulea.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Fossil doesn't seem to get along with square brackets: Z:\fossil add file[N].x Z:\fossil.exe: filename contains illegal characters: file[N].x I saw that there is already an open ticket about Unicode filenames, but

Re: [fossil-users] fossil stash gdiff

On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:47:27 -0500 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: [...] It seems the program is started with parameters like /temp/xDjd8RXRlXyBTEo /temp/RgKiAnjkXUrB61Z, and I can see some temporary files like this created, but obviously winmerge cannot pick them up. Some things I

Re: [fossil-users] Behavior of rm, mv, and changes/extra

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:22:52 -0500 Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote: (1)  fossil rm removes the files from the disk (2)  fossil mv renames the files on disk (3)  fossil settings crnl-glob ** (4)  fossil update == fossil update current (5)  Unlimited undo (purgin old undos after

Re: [fossil-users] Behavior of rm, mv, and changes/extra

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:47:00 +0100 Ramon Ribó ram...@compassis.com wrote: [...] (9) in the web page, possibility to mark branches as hidden. It will be invisible in the timeline, branches section and files section (files belonging only to hidden branches do not appear), unless a special

Re: [fossil-users] fossil artifact not complaining

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:35:13 +0100 frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote: I think it should be fixed to a better behaviour (the command to emit an error and not overwrite the file). i've patched this locally to do: [stephan@hamsun:~/cvs/fossil/fossil]$ ./fossil artifact

Re: [fossil-users] make fossil up 'quiter'

On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:19:36 - Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote: [...] $ fossil up Autosync: http://www.fossil-scm.org/ Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent: 177 2 0 0 Received:2608 57 0 0

Re: [fossil-users] make fossil up 'quiter'

On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:55:01AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: fossil always reports the latest artifact ID and commit message whenever doing 'fossil up', even though actually there was no new check-in. for example: $ fossil up Autosync: http://www.fossil-scm.org/

Re: [fossil-users] documentation clarification

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:18:18 -0400 Chris Peachment ch...@ononbb.com wrote: [...] The wonders of the internet include the Network Time Protocol (http://www.ntp.org/) and I think all major operating systems have a mechanism for enabling it, if that is not the default. It is then possible to

Re: [fossil-users] Keeping password on clone

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:28:46 + Kevin Martin ke...@khn.org.uk wrote: I have looked through the documentation, and I really can't seem to figure this out. I set up a repository on a server. fossil init test.fossil fossil server -P 1 I VPN on to the remote network, and from my

Re: [fossil-users] Check out files directly from remote repository

On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:24:00 +0100 ma...@include-once.org wrote: Probably missing something very obvious. But how do you get the current set of files from a remote repository? (Using the command line, not the server UI.) With SVN or GIT you can just do a checkout on the server url with

Re: [fossil-users] Translation

On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:56:46 +0100 BohwaZ boh...@bohwaz.net wrote: I'm wondering if there is way to translate the Fossil web interface? Is it planned? That would be nice for us, non-english speaking users. I disagree. Translation to several languages would mean bloat. That might be okay

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:56:42 -0500 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Point of curiosity: Is there a Twitter feed for Fossil? I was thinking the other day that it might be cool to have a feature whereby a Fossil server would tweet every time it got a new check-in or ticket or wiki edit,

Re: [fossil-users] Trying out fossil: two issues with branches and empty folders

On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:32:40 +0100 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: [...] Fossil doesn't track directories. If you want to get rid of empty ones, one way to do this in Unix is: find . -type d | xargs rmdir Notes: a) rmdir will refuse to delete non-empty dirs, so the above will

Re: [fossil-users] Using althttpd.c

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:57:37PM +0100, Paolo Bolzoni wrote: Today I tried to use althttpd.c as HTTP server for serving few fossil scm. But I cannot execute CGI scripts. [...] Now once I start xinetd if I go to 127.0.0.1 with my browser the server greets me saying there is no document in /

Re: [fossil-users] How to list commits made so far?

On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:10:12 +0100 Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: [...] One thing I'm not clear about, is how fossil timeline works: When using -n 5, it shows three lines, while -n 10 shows five lines, and -n 20 shows eleven :-/ http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/help?cmd=timeline

Re: [fossil-users] How to list commits made so far?

On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 15:45:16 +0100 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: I can guess that's the effect of timeline defaulting to showing tickets and wiki edits as well as commits. What happens if you do fossil timeline -t ci -n 20 ? Good idea, but still strange:

Re: [fossil-users] iOS and Android?

On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:12:39AM +, David Bovill wrote: I'd like to be able to use Fossil as data storage for a project I am working on, this project will in the future need to work on mobile devices. Sqlite is accessible on these devices, would a minimal mobile version of Fossil for

Re: [fossil-users] How to list commits made so far?

On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 09:28:51 -0500 Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: wrote: Is there a command that I could run to list all the commits, and for each, would show which files were part of the commit? fossil timeline -showfiles -n 10 The -n parameter is kind of a kludge there. By

Re: [fossil-users] 2 questions

On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:52:04 +0200 Zeev Pekar z.pe...@gmail.com wrote: [...] It would be impossible to implement within fossil's world view. Once i clone a repo i have the whole thing, which i can then manipulate (with admin-level rights) on my machine - you cannot stop me from checking

Re: [fossil-users] Stash and local directory

On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:50:02 +0100 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed that 'fossil stash save' only saves the files that are under the subdirectory I run the command. Shouldn't it save all the changed files in the repository? My v1.20 build says in its `fossil help

Re: [fossil-users] Stash and local directory

On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:58:47 +0100 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Save the current changes in the working tree as a new stash. So looks like you've found a bug. i disagree - the wording there is slightly ambiguous: working tree could be interpreted as the entire checkout or tree ==

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil Repository Does Not Exist Error

On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:56:21 +0200 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Or if you DO have uncommitted changes you can also try: rm _FOSSIL_ Dangerous if you have stashed changes ;-) Aha - THAT explains why i lost my stash the last time i did that ... ;) For the record

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil Repository Does Not Exist Error

On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:00:41 -0700 Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: I usually open the _FOSSIL_ file with sqlite3 and update the pointer to the repo db. A repodb reset command or some such would be nice to have. fossil switch NEW_LOCATION That would make Subversion users feel at home.

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil is Awesome

On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:51:05 -0700 Caleb Gray ca...@calebgray.com wrote: [...] 3) The web interface could use a face lift, as well as some HTML5 functionality. I've got a lot of web development experience and would love to contribute in this area, also. All of the work on the JSON APIs

Re: [fossil-users] Veracity (was: Fwd: suggestion on fossil)

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:28:27 +0200 jos van kesteren josvankeste...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Even that is not necessarily true. You can't merge binary files like text files -- sure. But it doesn't mean that for a specific binary format, a merge algorithm isn't possible. Consider ODF documents

Re: [fossil-users] Locks (Was: Veracity)

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 07:41:56PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: That could even help even before fossil having a capability of centraliising locks; the read-only permissions could be enough for the people in a team to decide on the locks. Can we do read-only cross-platform (i.e. Windows)?

Re: [fossil-users] target diffwindow - annoying to me

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:38:37PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: The timeline links [view] and [diff] use the target=diffwindow (introduced by drh in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/ci/6d9bba56dcdcad806a2e8672fe3835d04fad76c2 ) I really dislike the browser opening a new window for

Re: [fossil-users] ui side-by-side diffs

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:48:58 +0200 Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW: this could be implemented in JavaScript, using the JSON API to fetch the actual diffs, and then laying them out in JS (rather than C):

Re: [fossil-users] What's goning on ? why warnings ?

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:27:27 +0200 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: [ijse@~/Desktop/WorkTable/WatchWizard]$ fossil changes EDITED src/js/controller/AppController.js [ijse@~/Desktop/WorkTable/WatchWizard]$ (exe:6061): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead This

Re: [fossil-users] GUI client for Windows?

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:31:16 -0400 Erlis Vidal er...@erlisvidal.com wrote: Take a look to protocol buffers. The implementation is not restricted only to java, c++, python. Other people are adding more languages... this gives you kind of portability Last time I checked GPB was implemented in

Re: [fossil-users] GUI client for Windows?

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:20:12 +0200 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Last time I checked GPB was implemented in the form of a C++ library. Many C++ APIs can be used from C code, actually, as long as their C+ +-only functionality can be hidden behind an intermediary C-style API. My

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:24:30 +0200 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: [...] And when you find an issue with a commit that is some way back in your personal branch it is more logical and easier to review your branch if you append the fix to the commit where it belongs

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:12:31 -0700 Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: That sort of we don't need it, we don't need it mantra is a typical case of the famous Blub paradox. I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to rewrite history and another one which doesn't, the first

Re: [fossil-users] SSL: cannot connect to host www.fossil-scm.org:443

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 17:42:41 +0200 Jiří Navrátil j...@navratil.cz wrote: I was going to sync fossil source after long time and I'm getting fossil sync Server:https://myn...@www.fossil-scm.org/fossil Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent:3086 65

Re: [fossil-users] SSL: cannot connect to host www.fossil-scm.org:443

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:50:18 +0200 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: $ openssl s_client -host www.fossil-scm.org -port 443 CONNECTED(0003) write:errno=104 $ grep -w 104 /usr/include/asm-generic/errno.h #define ECONNRESET 104 /* Connection reset by peer */

Re: [fossil-users] SSL: cannot connect to host www.fossil-scm.org:443

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:50:18 +0200 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: $ openssl s_client -host www.fossil-scm.org -port 443 CONNECTED(0003) write:errno=104 $ grep -w 104 /usr/include/asm-generic/errno.h #define ECONNRESET 104 /* Connection reset by peer */

Re: [fossil-users] Why you should not shun

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:06:54 -0400 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: [...] (1) Know what you are checking in before you do the check-in. If I had simply paid attention to the size of the *.odp file that I was committing, I would have realized that it would be a slow syncer. Just a thought:

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] IPv6 support and improved reverse proxying support

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:00:14 +0530 ashish...@lostca.se (Ashish SHUKLA) wrote: [...] 2. IPv6 support. Fossil uses IPv4 sockets by default. I was not sure if there was any technical reason to not add support for IPv6, so I modified it all relevant places (I was able to find) to use IPv6

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] IPv6 support and improved reverse proxying support

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:39:18 +0200 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: 2. IPv6 support. Fossil uses IPv4 sockets by default. I was not sure if there was any technical reason to not add support for IPv6, so I modified it all relevant places (I was able to find) to use IPv6

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] IPv6 support and improved reverse proxying support

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 22:24:02 +0530 ashish...@lostca.se (Ashish SHUKLA) wrote: That is cool, but please be sure to make such IPv6 mode not enabled by default unless it's somehow possible to make it work transparently on a conventional box with IPv4 only networking. Well, you can

  1   2   >