Re: [fossil-users] Timeline graph problem on fossil-scm.org

2014-04-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
It looks like two repositories that got commits, and they weren't in sync. And Jan merged the two leaves without writing about it. On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 10:55:58AM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: Hi... I've just notice a strange timeline graph on fossil-scm.org and it seems to be cause by a

Re: [fossil-users] Scalability limits

2014-02-07 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:39:37PM +0100, Gour wrote: On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:40:32 +0100 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: It would be really cool to see someone implement their own SCM based on fossil's core artifact model and their own db back-end, though. What about Monotone?

[fossil-users] fossil info does not report leaf/closed

2014-01-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello all, I think it'd be helpful i fossil info would report if the current commit is a leaf, if it is closed or not, etc. It seems to report only the sym- tags. I've been confused doing some work, and then finding that I'm ona closed leaf (already merged to parent branch). :) Regards, Lluís.

Re: [fossil-users] fossil info does not report leaf/closed

2014-01-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:54:22PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: the leaf line currently only appears if it's closed, but i'd go ahead and expand it to (A) appear whenever the current uuid is a leaf and (B) say open

Re: [fossil-users] fossil info does not report leaf/closed

2014-01-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:17:38PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: yes|closed imply a leaf and yes implies opened i'm about to be offline for a while but wanted to get this checked in:

[fossil-users] Get a checkin diff from cli

2014-01-22 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello all, knowing the checkin hash, how can I get in cli the diff introduced by of the checkin? Similar to what appears in the checkin page on the ui. Regards, Lluís. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Get a checkin diff from cli

2014-01-22 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 06:25:14AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: Hello all, knowing the checkin hash, how can I get in cli the diff introduced by of the checkin? Similar to what appears in the checkin page

[fossil-users] 1.28 vdiff changes

2014-01-10 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, the Changes page says for 1.28: - Enhancements to the /vdiff webpage for more difference display options. But what I see, is that it lost the 'Patch' option. What are exactly the additional display options? Thank you, Lluís ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] 1.28 vdiff changes

2014-01-10 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:24:12AM -0500, Martin Gagnon wrote: On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:19:19PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Hello, the Changes page says for 1.28: - Enhancements to the /vdiff webpage for more difference display options. But what I see, is that it lost

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

2014-01-09 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:12:31PM +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: On Jan 9, 2014, at 16:00 , Martin S. Weber wrote: But I want Fossil to follow the latest SQLite alphas, not the latest SQLite stables. That's the whole point: Fossil supports SQLite as a test platform. SQLite

Re: [fossil-users] Export artifact to archive?

2014-01-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:36:26PM +, Roy Marples wrote: Hi List Can fossil create an archive (tarball, zip file, etc) from a given artifact id WITHOUT using the web interface? Something like this is what I need: $ fossil archive ?ID | bzip2 distribution-version.tar.bz2 Hi, fossil

[fossil-users] Annotate: when are files added?

2013-12-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, it'd be nice if 'annotate' could be told to follow merges. It seems that it cannot distinguish if a new file came through a merge, or it was completely new. So, if you add a file in branch A, and then merge A to B, C, D, ... annotating the file in any branch B, C, ... will have the

[fossil-users] JSON commit

2013-11-07 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I'd like to have a json operation to commit files. It is not there yet, right? There is branch creation, but not any interface to commit. I'd like to be able to commit (linked to json login), without having a checkout. Regards, Lluís. ___

Re: [fossil-users] ticket management

2013-10-15 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:09:41PM +0200, j. van den hoff wrote: I'm in the process of giving the ticket system a try for a collaboration where we need to keep track of text document changes on the one side and have a facility to report problems/issues observed with the system (hardware, not

Re: [fossil-users] Autosync: Too bad git doesn't have it...

2013-09-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:02:12PM -0700, B Harder wrote: I read this roughly (in fossil-speak) as: I had a bunch of email notes from folks requesting I merge their feature-branches into my main branch, but my machine crashed and my mail isn't accessible… I don't read it that way. Linus

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-07-30 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Jan Nijtmans wrote: 2013/7/12 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: Well, just try out the merge-integrate branch. I would say the glass is full again.;-) Indeed it is! i like what you've

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-07-30 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:45:31AM +0100, Jan Nijtmans wrote: 2013/7/30 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name: About the code starting at line 1693, it looks to me like it runs in any case. Does this change only add a new --integrate, or it also changes the behaviour of usual merges

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-25 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:44:16AM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: Le 2013-07-25 06:43, Jan Nijtmans a écrit : 2013/7/25 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: Native, pure-blooded windows binaries run just fine on cygwin, right? So why are we complicating the code with exceptions, special cases, and

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-25 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:59:38AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: In Theory, fossil should build and work on fossil like on any other unix like Operating system (like linux/*bsd etc..) That's what cygwin is for. grep

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-25 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 03:46:21PM +0200, Jan Nijtmans wrote: 2013/7/25 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: If it does work, then I move for the immediate banishment of all __CYGWIN__ macros. Doing that will break four things: - Accessing a check-out repository on Cygwin, while the previous

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
+0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Hello, today I built fossil on cygwin64, and it built but it didn't work. Cloning, a line in os_win.c complained about not having permission to create a file (a tmp file with some kind of random string) in C:/windows. I can easily reproduce that (see

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:16:19AM +0200, Jan Nijtmans wrote: 2013/7/24 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name: Do you happen to know if I can build and run programs for cygwin32, in a cygwin64 installation? or I should run two cygwin setups in orthogonally, 32 and 64? I would

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Jan Nijtmans wrote: 2013/7/24 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name: I think our main usage for a cygwin fossil is that we develop using a cygwin terminal with bash and vim. And we want fossil to spawn vim properly on commit. That should work

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Jan Nijtmans wrote: 2013/7/24 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name: I think our main usage for a cygwin fossil is that we develop using a cygwin terminal with bash and vim. And we want fossil to spawn vim properly on commit. That should work

[fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-22 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, today I built fossil on cygwin64, and it built but it didn't work. Cloning, a line in os_win.c complained about not having permission to create a file (a tmp file with some kind of random string) in C:/windows. I wonder... why is it running any os_win code? shouldn't cygwin look like

[fossil-users] autosync with fossil merge

2013-07-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I think I wrote this before, but I use autosync, and I often end up making a fossil merge of a locally-outdated branch. It's quite annoying. :) Should fossil merge autosync before attempting the merge, if autosync is set? Regards, Lluís. ___

Re: [fossil-users] autosync with fossil merge

2013-07-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:43:15PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: I think I wrote this before, but I use autosync, and I often end up making a fossil merge of a locally-outdated branch. It's quite annoying

Re: [fossil-users] autosync with fossil merge

2013-07-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 07:26:57PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:00 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: That way, we are never caught off guard. Until there's an unintended fork, then it leads into an area new users probably aren't comfortable with - merging and

Re: [fossil-users] Side-by-side diff improvement

2013-07-07 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 11:49:56AM -0400, Joel Bruick wrote: Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: I still have to test this scrollbar proposal (I don't like much scrollbars inside windows which already have scrollbars...), but at least it goes into a good direction. Heh, I'm with you 99

Re: [fossil-users] Side-by-side diff improvement

2013-07-06 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 02:34:38PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Joel Bruick wrote: Hi all, I've committed a pretty big changeto the diff code(http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/4081a91c84) , and I'd like some other people to take a look at it/test it out

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil, proxies and SSL, revisited

2013-06-17 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:56:03AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Brandon Invergo bran...@invergo.netwrote: However, when I attempt to sync my Fossil repositories, I receive the following error: $ fossil sync

Re: [fossil-users] Did you know that Fossil could do...

2013-05-28 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:08:10AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for Fossil, you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff between those two nodes? I think this is a very useful feature. But I'm guessing that not many

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki-Pages synchronisation

2013-05-13 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:58:04AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.orgwrote: When I first learned about fossil and the integrated tickets/wiki, I assumed that both of these features were also version controlled just

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki-Pages synchronisation

2013-05-08 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:01:42PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: In fact, I don't see why most VCS tend (somehow propose) to *not commit* merge conflicts before solving the conflicts. That makes the conflict

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki-Pages synchronisation

2013-05-08 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 07:28:59AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: I don't see why most VCS tend (somehow propose) to *not commit* merge conflicts before solving the conflicts. That makes the conflict solution

Re: [fossil-users] TH1 bomb

2013-05-08 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
I see the same. On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 07:02:28PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: Caught by a chance (try evaluate info in TH1 without a sub-command) % ./fossil test-th-eval info ;# bomb (100% cpu/mem usage) Segmentation fault Is it reproducible? More pain for a server

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket 'subsystem' field?

2013-03-24 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 09:37:41PM +, org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com wrote: Hello. I can set the subsystem field of a given ticket to XYZ with fossil ticket set X subsystem XYZ, but I can't seem to work out how to populate the drop down subsystem menu in the web interface.

[fossil-users] Bad link to 'Add attachment' in timeline

2013-03-18 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, the links to the attachments added are broken in the timeline. Example: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?u=stephanc=2013-01-25+17%3A41%3A18ndn=2 (Look for Add attachment and click the attachment link). I'm not sure how to fix it. Simply remove %R in these two lines?

Re: [fossil-users] Good repository to test scalability of fossil

2013-03-08 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:12:24PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 09:09:56AM -0500, Martin Gagnon wrote: I know someone recently test with the NetBSD port tree, but port tree is a bit less realistic since it contain a incredible huge number of small files with an

[fossil-users] bisect 'test failed'

2013-03-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, fossil bisect currently only allows 'good' or 'bad'. Looking for the introduction of a bug requires also the state of can't test, because a checkin could be so broken that doesn't allow determining if the checkin is 'good' or 'bad'. Could that 3rd state be introduced? Git allows it

Re: [fossil-users] bisect 'test failed'

2013-03-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:48:13AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: Hello, fossil bisect currently only allows 'good' or 'bad'. Looking for the introduction of a bug requires also the state of can't test, because

Re: [fossil-users] bisect 'test failed'

2013-03-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:54:39PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:48:13AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: Hello, fossil bisect currently only allows 'good' or 'bad'. Looking

Re: [fossil-users] bisect 'test failed'

2013-03-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:02:21PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: What does bisect do when you give it a can't test? Suggest another version to test, and keep on going. Look for 'skip' in git-bisect(1

[fossil-users] The finfo page, and the graph there

2013-03-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I never understood quite well the 'finfo' page arrows. Is there any detailed explanation of it, and what the arrows mean? I've the feeling that the last file change in trunk there appearing, does not mean it's the last state of the file in last trunk, and that always confused me. Can it

Re: [fossil-users] The finfo page, and the graph there

2013-03-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Great explanation, Richard! Thank you a lot! Part of my confusion was related to me never noticing the 'Full' link at the top. Best regards, Lluís. On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 09:48:01AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote

Re: [fossil-users] Odd problem syncing to fossil repo

2013-02-28 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 02:12:21PM +0200, Ron Aaron wrote: When I disable my machine's firewall I have the same problem. But all my other fossil repos (against my own server) don't have the problem. I don't understand why the main fossil repo would have any issues, since it's all http,

[fossil-users] Broken annotate since trunk 2012-11-15

2013-02-27 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I think that the change in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/ee33b951a4 broke the annotate in fossil. We use annotate a lot, but as many know, we don't use trunk, but the annotate_links branch, that I update only from tie to time. That's why I only noticed now the issue from

[fossil-users] The checkin comment in the info page

2013-02-22 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, the checkin Comment: in the info web page used to be formatted like a wiki. Now it appears formatted as in the timeline. Thus, no newlines, no 'verbatim', ... Is this intended? I preferred the old way. Regards, Lluís. ___ fossil-users mailing

[fossil-users] Bad error in case of db locked

2013-02-22 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I've just tried to commit while I was running another commit in another shell, and fossil told me such a misleading message :) Maybe it can be improved. Autosync: fossil: SQL error: database is lockedeceived: 0 If you have recently updated your fossil executable, you might

Re: [fossil-users] Making the go tool support fossil

2013-02-21 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:24:27AM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: IOW, that shell pipeline was just an example demonstrated to you, so don't be too attached to the fact it requires a shell. That's

Re: [fossil-users] Making the go tool support fossil

2013-02-21 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:13:14PM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:28:52 +0100 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote: [...] That's correct, but Lluis is right in suggesting that we should have a command like: fossil ping repo-address

Re: [fossil-users] Feature requests: fossil ui and server improvements

2013-02-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:40:27AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote: Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com writes: There is also no reason to prohibit text-based browsers. i'm not aware of any which support JavaScript,

Re: [fossil-users] Change the CSS

2013-02-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:43:35PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: what is the usual process of updating the CSS? I see in /setup_editcss that the text editable is not the same as the 'default' below. I click Revert to Default, and the editable text is still different. I also see

Re: [fossil-users] Change the CSS

2013-02-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:54:49AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:43:35PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: what is the usual process of updating the CSS? I see

[fossil-users] Making the go tool support fossil

2013-02-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I'm trying to add fossil support to the 'go tool', as it supports other VCSs: http://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-Remote_import_path_syntax Adding fossil supprt requires lots of changes, due to a lack of similarity with the other VCS supported. The current code is not flexible enough, and I

Re: [fossil-users] Making the go tool support fossil

2013-02-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:00:13PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: 1) there were a way to clone+checkout at once into a subdirectory: fossil clonedir http://blabla.org/ blabla # ^ It creates blabla/, blabla

Re: [fossil-users] Making the go tool support fossil

2013-02-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:18:35PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: 2) and if there were a way to check if an upstream repository answers correctly, other than by cloning into a file: fossil remoteinfo http

[fossil-users] Password asked per push

2013-02-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello all, can I set the remote in some way, so my upstream password isn't stored to disk, but the url and the username are so? I'd like the password to be asked per push or sync command. I'd feel safer and more comfortable this way, when I have a local repository in computers under not only my

[fossil-users] Change the CSS

2013-02-17 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, what is the usual process of updating the CSS? I see in /setup_editcss that the text editable is not the same as the 'default' below. I click Revert to Default, and the editable text is still different. I also see that the default header picks style.css?default. It looks like, by

[fossil-users] Ticket changes and mimetype

2013-02-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, having a repository with ticket 'append' artifacts without mimetype doesn't work well with fossil trunk ([a1d2cd84b8]). This is the case of many old 'append' artifacts, and also the case of new artifacts if the Edit Ticket page isn't updated to add the mimetype. I think that any lack of

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket changes and mimetype

2013-02-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
, to propose a patch. :) On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 05:50:18PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Hello, having a repository with ticket 'append' artifacts without mimetype doesn't work well with fossil trunk ([a1d2cd84b8]). This is the case of many old 'append' artifacts, and also the case

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket changes and mimetype

2013-02-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
can't find that code now, to propose a patch. :) On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 05:50:18PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Hello, having a repository with ticket 'append' artifacts without mimetype doesn't work well with fossil trunk ([a1d2cd84b8]). This is the case of many old

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket changes and mimetype

2013-02-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:16:23PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: Both +comment and icomment are supported in the latest code. If you are running a recent Fossil (that you have compiled yourself from sources

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket changes and mimetype

2013-02-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:41:47PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:16:23PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket changes and mimetype

2013-02-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:23:46PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: If I don't rebuild the database, the comments appear fine. If I rebuild, they don't appear. Does this match the situation? Because it seems

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket changes and mimetype

2013-02-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:38:38PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:23:46PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: I do not know why this is not working for you. Ah ok. I've tried a new

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket changes and mimetype

2013-02-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:49:34PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: I built a new fossil, cloned the fossil repository, and looked at the tickets. They don't have comments. I'm a bit confused why we don't see the same in this simple case. Ok, I've just pushed a fix for what I see. I wonder

Re: [fossil-users] cannot find a common ancestor between the current checkout

2013-02-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 12:59:08PM +0800, Daniel YC Lin wrote: I don't know why my repository become two track? How to solve this? Have you run fossil sync before that? Are you sure you have dd76 locally? $ fossil stat repository: /home/dlin/fs/abs.fossil local-root:

Re: [fossil-users] Proper use of revert

2013-01-30 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 02:48:33PM -0800, Arnel Legaspi wrote: Hello - Yesterday I needed to revert back a commit involving 2 files to its parent commit. The working copy was at the tip (1255785c96) and I needed to get back to revision 4002407825. When I tried running fossil revert -r

Re: [fossil-users] howto `grep' through old revisions

2013-01-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:59:19AM +0100, Gilles wrote: On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:10:26 -0700, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, didn't paste in the second grep: Thanks for contributing this work-around. I guess it shows that there's a need for an easy, integrated grep to find

Re: [fossil-users] howto `grep' through old revisions

2013-01-28 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:21:03AM +0100, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 08:40:14 -0500, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 01:51:51PM +0100, Gilles wrote: Since this thread

Re: [fossil-users] howto `grep' through old revisions

2013-01-28 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:01:32AM +0100, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:43:19 +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote: What do you mean by deconstruct? Checking files out? As this question goes to me... $ fossil help deconstruct Thanks. After running deconstruct, do

Re: [fossil-users] Strange fossil use (multiple leaves)

2013-01-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
previous commit? Maybe because of a merge without committing, once trunk gets a new checkin, merge again, then again the same, until at the end you commit? I quite don't get why would someone do that, though :) On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:48:59 +0100 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote

[fossil-users] A warning on 'undo'

2013-01-18 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, fossil overwrote some changes I had, without telling, on 'undo' command; I'd prefer it to give a warning. I used: $ fossil merge otherbranch $ test... edit a file... test... and I decide I don't want the merge $ fossil undo # This restores all files merged, ignoring my file edit. I'd

[fossil-users] Strange fossil use (multiple leaves)

2013-01-18 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, looking at the tcl timeline, I've just seen a checkin like this: http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline?f=3c4edc83aae0e671 What is that kind of usage? I feel strange that the merge trunk has arrows from *3 trunk leaves*, and *2 more checkins* from one of the trunk branches. What have they typed

Re: [fossil-users] A warning on 'undo'

2013-01-18 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote: Hello, fossil overwrote some changes I had, without telling, on 'undo' command; I'd prefer it to give a warning. I used: $ fossil merge otherbranch $ test... edit a file... test... and I decide I don't want the merge $ fossil undo

[fossil-users] Tags and branches ui

2013-01-10 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, it would be nice if the Tags and Branches ui pages had something more than the names listed. For example, next to each, could be the date of the head or the last commit referred to. What do you think? Regards, Lluís. ___ fossil-users mailing

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2012-12-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
(top post, due to the complexity of the previous post) I've found many git-fans that are completely ashamed of how they develop. And they would never make public how they commit things (how they use the VCS), so they don't accept other VCS that hasn't git rebasing capabilities. I can't tell what

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2012-12-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 07:55:28PM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:20:32 +0100 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote: sarcasmYou guys do really sound as a religious sect./sarcasm :) well, I think that everyone expects different jobs to be done by a VCS

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2012-12-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 04:40:28PM -0600, Nico Williams wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote: (top post, due to the complexity of the previous post) I've found many git-fans that are completely ashamed of how they develop

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2012-12-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 05:37:35PM -0600, Nico Williams wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 04:40:28PM -0600, Nico Williams wrote: And so on. Really. Large projects need order, they need process. They need clean

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2012-12-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:06:05PM +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: On Dec 18, 2012, at 14:42 , Gilles wrote: Out of curiosity, if someone is well-versed with Fossil and the main DVCS systems (Mercurial, Git), I was wondering how Fossil compares to them, for a single user, a

Re: [fossil-users] Improvements to side-by-side diff

2012-12-18 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:27:09AM +0100, Paolo Bolzoni wrote: Maybe joining both ideas? Like coloring the whole word of a more neutral color and the difference with the usual bright color? I think it would be the best as I agree with both point of views. Fwiw, I'd prefer only the

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2012-12-18 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 03:29:19PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:42:34 +0100 Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: Out of curiosity, if someone is well-versed with Fossil and the main DVCS systems (Mercurial, Git), Fossil: it's strong points are the built-in wiki and

[fossil-users] High cpu usage, ci_edit adding tag

2012-12-17 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, adding a tag, in the edit checking page, it takes 15s of server cpu time (a reasonably fast Atom x86_64) for our repository. Repository statistics: Repository Size:274292736 bytes (274.3MB) Number Of Artifacts:31867 (stored as 12262 full text and 19605 delta blobs) Uncompressed

Re: [fossil-users] High cpu usage, ci_edit adding tag

2012-12-17 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 08:28:22AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: Hello, adding a tag, in the edit checking page, it takes 15s of server cpu time (a reasonably fast Atom x86_64) for our repository

Re: [fossil-users] howto `grep' through old revisions

2012-12-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 01:51:51PM +0100, Gilles wrote: On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:57:41 +0100, j. v. d. hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: question: is there a straightforward (or sqlite-based) way to `grep' through a specified file recursively backward in time through all revisions (or

Re: [fossil-users] How to change number of columns for a side-by-side diff in the web interface

2012-12-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:27:37PM -0200, Jonas Malaco Filho wrote: First, is there an option to change the number of columns for side-by-side diffs on the web interface? Also, is there any setting to change the default number of columns for SBS diffs, or could one be included? *Jonas Malaco

Re: [fossil-users] How to change number of columns for a side-by-side diff in the web interface

2012-12-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:42:46PM -0200, Jonas Malaco Filho wrote: Shouldn't it be dw=90? Ah right. dc is for the number of context lines. Also, how did you change the default SBS show? The source code of the diff is different in trunk and in my branch. 2012/12/4 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

2012-11-26 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:52:53PM -0600, Nico Williams wrote: IIUC the main reason to want a DLL instead of having to spawn a new process for every operation is iOS. I hear that the dearth of excellent git (and other) SCM clients for iOS has to do with the constrained nature of the run-time

Re: [fossil-users] howto `grep' through old revisions

2012-11-24 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:18:55AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:57 AM, j. v. d. hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote: question: is there a straightforward (or sqlite-based) way to `grep' through a specified file recursively backward in time through all revisions

Re: [fossil-users] howto `grep' through old revisions

2012-11-24 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:59:58AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:18:55AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:57 AM, j. v. d. hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote

Re: [fossil-users] serious problem with wiki editing

2012-11-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:20:02AM +, K wrote: This is as a result of a featured added on my behalf, I'm afraid. There should now be (I haven't found occasion to update my Fossil to 1.24 given I'd have to repatch the wiki page name length requirement) an option somewhere allowing the

Re: [fossil-users] serious problem with wiki editing

2012-11-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:28:30AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:20:02AM +, K wrote: This is as a result of a featured added on my behalf, I'm afraid. There should now

[fossil-users] Search tickets

2012-11-09 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, if I understand correctly, the Tickets system lacks a 'Ticket Search page'. It allows to create Ticket Reports, but I think it would be nice if it allowed also to create 'Ticket Search pages'. That'd look like html+th1 (like New Ticket), but the result operation would be a sql query, and

Re: [fossil-users] Help improve bot exclusion

2012-10-30 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:17:05AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: Finally: Do you have any further ideas on how to defend a Fossil website against runs such as the two we observed on SQLite last night? This problem affects almost any web software, and I think that job is delegated to robots.txt.

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about fossil

2012-10-21 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:29:56PM +0200, Paolo Bolzoni wrote: I love fossil and use it in all my projects, and using I got few questions I cannot find the answers... - Can I change the zip archive name in the check-in page? The zip file name is the last part of the url, in

Re: [fossil-users] Handling merge conflicts?

2012-10-21 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:54:06PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: In the change above, there is no explicit resolve step. Fossil automatically senses whether or not you have resolved the conflict through editing. I think that the change misses one of the most valuable situations - those of binary

Re: [fossil-users] add/commit file through web interface

2012-10-17 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:44:37AM -0400, Ron Wilson wrote: I'm sorry. It is burried in there. We were looking for it on the New Ticket page. Weird that all 6 of us would miss that. We use the ticket attachments quite a lot. It works fine here, and it's enough for our needs. On 10/16/12,

Re: [fossil-users] Downloading raw artifacts

2012-10-09 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:30:56PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:19:28PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: An artifact does not necessarily have a filename, or it might have multiple filenames. Nevertheless, we can guess at the filename, and from that guess

  1   2   3   4   5   >