[fossil-users] Extra code in autosetup/local.tcl

Hi Joe, I was just looking at autosetup/local.tcl and I see back in 2014 you committed 3a5c9b34f39be09b contain a bunch of extra code. It looks like this is copied from jim local.tcl I suggest deleting everything from '# The complex extension checking is done here.' onwards to avoid

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup: hidden autoconf/automake compatibility

> On 15 Oct 2016, at 2:01 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is FYI suggestion to make compatibility of autosetup to support the > system expecting typical autoconf/automake options while not killing > nice option checking feature of autosetup via

Re: [fossil-users] Build should be continued for unknown options

> On 15 Oct 2016, at 6:59 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a trivial patch to build the source tree even with unknown options > for autosetup/autosetup but make sure to warn user. > > The idea is from Barak A. Pearlmutter. > > Regards, > > Osamu autosetup

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil build improvements...

> On 8 Feb 2016, at 11:28 am, Andreas Kupries wrote: > > >> On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 3:12 PM, David Macek wrote: >> >>> On 7. 2. 2016 2:53, Joe Mistachkin wrote: I'm unable to test with MingW64; however, I think Jan Nijtmans uses it. >>>

Re: [fossil-users] please compile official fossil builds with https support

On 12 Jun 2015, at 1:30 am, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 6/11/15, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: IANAL, but [1] looks like it would be possible to ship its complete source code with fossil and build it directly in, when requested. 1.

Re: [fossil-users] Jim Tcl website is broken

On 29 Jan 2015, at 10:44 am, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 1/28/15, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote: Hi All, The Jim Tcl website is hosted as a fossil repository here: http://jim.tcl.tk/index.html/doc/www/www/index.html The front page still works, but none

[fossil-users] Jim Tcl website is broken

Hi All, The Jim Tcl website is hosted as a fossil repository here: http://jim.tcl.tk/index.html/doc/www/www/index.html The front page still works, but none of the subpage links work. This is because (e.g.) http://jim.tcl.tk/index.html/doc/www/www/news/ no longer automatically redirects to

Re: [fossil-users] Getting configure to find openssl on FreeBSD

On 12 Sep 2014, at 5:06 am, org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com wrote: 'Lo. The fossil build scripts seem to be unable to find openssl on FreeBSD 9.2. It has a choice of the version included with the base system (in /usr) or the version available from FreeBSD ports (/usr/local), but it

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

On 8 Aug 2014, at 2:34 pm, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Joe Mistachkin on Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:14:56 -0700: Yeah, it appears the net change was that Jim Tcl was updated. There are quite a lot of changes to it since the last version. However, I think it should

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

On 8 Aug 2014, at 12:52 am, Sean Woods s...@seanwoods.com wrote: Or you could ask me, since I wrote autosetup :-) I appreciate your assistance and responsiveness. glob.tcl is bundled up in the jimsh0 executable, but you can find it because the source code is there - autosetup/jimsh0.c

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

On 8 Aug 2014, at 10:58 am, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote: On 8 Aug 2014, at 12:52 am, Sean Woods s...@seanwoods.com wrote: Or you could ask me, since I wrote autosetup :-) I appreciate your assistance and responsiveness. glob.tcl is bundled up in the jimsh0 executable

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

On 8 Aug 2014, at 1:43 pm, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1410061405.efmchampahhhjobco...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Steve Bennett on Fri, 08 Aug 2014 12:30:52 +1000: I have fixed Jim Tcl, updated autosetup, and pushed a new version to the 'autosetup' branch. Did you intend

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

On 8 Aug 2014, at 2:14 pm, Joe Mistachkin sql...@mistachkin.com wrote: Andy Bradford wrote: Well, it looks like Joe decided to merge trunk into the branch, so it may not be anything to worry about. Yeah, it appears the net change was that Jim Tcl was updated. There are quite a

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

On 6 Aug 2014, at 2:08 pm, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 8/5/2014 18:50, Sean Woods wrote: I saw that jimsh references glob.tcl, so I removed all my local Tcl/Tk stuff -- I wasn't really using it -- and rebuilt Fossil clean from tip, to force it to use jimsh, and it still

Re: [fossil-users] ssl implementation

On 11/08/2013, at 10:49 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: Thanks for all your information about issues related to axTLS. Not everything you said warrants a specific response from me, but the thanks is my general response for everything to which I do not specifically respond below. Specific

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil build error on OS X

On 28/03/2013, at 3:39 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: On 26/03/2013, at 3:29 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: Hi, anyone had trouble compiling fossil on osx? I've not done it for a while and I'm wondering If I've missed something important? cheers, Stephen sp-laptop:fossil

Re: [fossil-users] status of fossil / jimtcl and docs

On 19/11/2012, at 7:01 PM, fossil-m...@h-rd.org wrote: From: Steve Bennett steveb-sr3wrjstenvtt0ehb6f...@public.gmane.org I created a proof-of-concept branch (jimtcl) around this time last year that replaced TH1 with Jim Tcl. I also added support for writing xfer scripts in Jim Tcl

Re: [fossil-users] howto `grep' through old revisions

On 25/11/2012, at 9:24 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:21:54 -0500, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: One big problem here is that the user will doubtless expect to have full Perl regular expressions.

Re: [fossil-users] status of fossil / jimtcl and docs

On 19/11/2012, at 5:23 AM, fossil-m...@h-rd.org wrote: Hi, I'm wondering what the status of fossil in connection with tcl/jimtcl is? Is trunk ready to be used with tcl? And are there any docs? My question is related to having jimtcl interfacing with the embedded web server of

Re: [fossil-users] fossil all rebuild seg faults

On 31/10/2012, at 10:11 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: Please try the latest and let me know whether or not the problem is fixed. Tnx for the report. Regarding your latest commit, I've run across this on 64 bit too. The problem is the '0' at the end of the variable args. Use NULL instead, otherwise

Re: [fossil-users] Build non-debug version

On 18/03/2012, at 9:02 AM, Christopher Berardi wrote: Since I run 64-bit Linux, I have to build fossil myself from source. That's not a problem in the least. However, I always have to manually change the makefile to remove the '-g' flag that gets added to the compiler command (I don't want a

Re: [fossil-users] Building fossil on Solaris

On 18/02/2012, at 8:12 AM, Jan Danielsson wrote: On 02/17/12 03:00, Steve Bennett wrote: [---] No problem. I've pushed the fix into autosetup and updated autosetup on a branch, so perhaps Richard will merge this fix at some point. I've encountered two other issues; one is fixed

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup build issues

On 19/02/2012, at 1:44 PM, Jan Danielsson wrote: Hello, I've been trying to get fossil to build using the auto-configurator on Solaris/sparc 9, and have encountered some minor bumps in the road. For the record (in case someone finds this via a web search): I think there's something

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup build issues

On 20/02/2012, at 11:16 AM, Jan Danielsson wrote: On 02/20/12 01:24, Richard Hipp wrote: [---] The dynamic linking works, but unfortunately on these particular [Solaris] systems I want static linking. :) I agree that static linking is nice. Unfortunately, the Solaris developers of Sun

Re: [fossil-users] With jimtcl available can we have hooks that trigger tcl scripts stored in the db?

On 17/02/2012, at 2:15 AM, Nolan Darilek wrote: Cool, I'd like to at least have the discussion about that, though. What I'd like to see, if possible, is read-only access to the repository--access to the SELECT statement, for instance, and a way to iterate over the results and output

Re: [fossil-users] Building fossil on Solaris

On 17/02/2012, at 10:57 AM, Jan Danielsson wrote: Hello, I've built fossil on Solaris previously using the old Makefile (requiring only very minor changes), but Makefile.classic seems to have degenerated a little, so I thought I'd try to use configure et al), but I end up with this:

Re: [fossil-users] Building fossil on Solaris

On 17/02/2012, at 11:08 AM, Steve Bennett wrote: On 17/02/2012, at 10:57 AM, Jan Danielsson wrote: Hello, I've built fossil on Solaris previously using the old Makefile (requiring only very minor changes), but Makefile.classic seems to have degenerated a little, so I thought I'd try

Re: [fossil-users] Building fossil on Solaris

On 17/02/2012, at 11:53 AM, Jan Danielsson wrote: On 02/17/12 02:23, Steve Bennett wrote: [.. FOO=bar ; export FOO ..] And let me know if that solves the problem? Ah, yes. Good ol' Solaris /bin/sh. That was it. I can't believe I missed that; I have been bitten by that particular

Re: [fossil-users] Building fossil on Solaris

On 17/02/2012, at 1:51 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/17/12 02:23, Steve Bennett wrote: [.. FOO=bar ; export FOO ..] And let me know if that solves the problem? We have this fix checked-in and running

Re: [fossil-users] With jimtcl available can we have hooks that trigger tcl scripts stored in the db?

On 14/02/2012, at 4:22 AM, Matt Welland wrote: I think it may be very useful if it was possible to call tcl scripts stored in the repo db (revision controlled files or wiki pages?) at pre/post commit and other interesting times. I know hooks were previously not accepted since making

Re: [fossil-users] With jimtcl available can we have hooks that trigger tcl scripts stored in the db?

On 14/02/2012, at 7:38 AM, Matt Welland wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote: On 14/02/2012, at 4:22 AM, Matt Welland wrote: I think it may be very useful if it was possible to call tcl scripts stored in the repo db (revision controlled

Re: [fossil-users] Using LDFLAGS with configure

Put the LDFLAGS= after ./configure WorkWare Systems P:0434 921 300 www.workware.net.au F:07 3102 9221 On 28/12/2011, at 14:02, James Turner ja...@calminferno.net wrote: How do I specify additional lib directories during the configure stage? Using: LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib ./configure

Re: [fossil-users] Using LDFLAGS with configure

Try CFLAGS instead WorkWare Systems P:0434 921 300 www.workware.net.au F:07 3102 9221 On 29/12/2011, at 3:25, James Turner ja...@calminferno.net wrote: On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 09:34:12PM +1100, Steve Bennett wrote: Put the LDFLAGS= after ./configure WorkWare Systems P:0434 921

Re: [fossil-users] Google bot

On 09/12/2011, at 2:59 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:49:16PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:40:08PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: How can it be that it finds the links? That URL is valid since one hour or two ago;

Re: [fossil-users] Google bot

On 09/12/2011, at 9:35 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 09:32:43AM +1000, Steve Bennett wrote: On 09/12/2011, at 2:59 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Why not just add a robots.txt? Ah, yes, that could help. I did not think of it. :) I'd like to have the wiki

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil and Git joint projects?

On 14/11/2011, at 9:55 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote: No comments on this? It works for me. Shall I commit this fix, or are there potential issues with it? I think go ahead and commit. FYI, what I committed

Re: [fossil-users] Mailing list archives for fossil-users not available?

On 06/12/2011, at 9:25 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/ works for me (from the fossil home page) Thanks. Indeed it does. That's good enough for me. On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote: My email

[fossil-users] Mailing list archives for fossil-users not available?

My email has been broken for a few days, so I went to check the archives. Any of the links at: http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/private/fossil-users says No such list ... fossil-dev seems ok. Cheers, Steve -- µWeb: Embedded Web Framework - http://uweb.workware.net.au/ WorkWare

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil and Git joint projects?

No comments on this?It works for me. Shall I commit this fix, or are there potential issues with it?On 10/11/2011, at 3:17 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:On 10/11/2011, at 2:50 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:On 10/11/2011, at 2:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:I tried to do something similar, using a git tag to keep

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil and Git joint projects?

On 10/11/2011, at 2:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: I tried to do something similar, using a git tag to keep track of where I was up to for the incremental import. It mostly works, except the timeline shows each import as disconnected from the previous import. See attached. For the import

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil and Git joint projects?

On 10/11/2011, at 2:50 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:On 10/11/2011, at 2:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:I tried to do something similar, using a git tag to keep track of where I was up tofor the incremental import.It mostly works, except the timeline shows each import as disconnected fromthe previous import

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil is Awesome

On 26/10/2011, at 5:59 PM, Nolan Darilek wrote: On 10/26/2011 04:50 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Nolan Darilek no...@thewordnerd.info wrote: like to see: hooks, and the ability to query the internal database and output the results into a page. The JSON

Re: [fossil-users] any interest in integrating jimtcl w/fossil?

On 24/09/2011, at 8:02 AM, Ron Wilson wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Martin S. Weber martin.we...@nist.gov wrote: As I've written earlier, I'd really like to see a list of all the commands and subcommands of tcl on one side, and all of the commands and subcommands of jim on the

Re: [fossil-users] any interest in integrating jimtcl w/fossil?

I agree that if your are going to integrate some language with fossil then Jim Tcl is nearly an ideal fit. It is small, modular, self contained, can replace TH1 easily and should be licence compatible. But... let's see a design proposal, or at least a prototype implementation. I think that

Re: [fossil-users] any interest in integrating jimtcl w/fossil?

On 21/09/2011, at 8:06 AM, Martin S. Weber martin.we...@nist.gov wrote: On 09/20/11 17:57, Steve Bennett wrote: I agree that if your are going to integrate some language with fossil then Jim Tcl is nearly an ideal fit. It is small, modular, self contained, can replace TH1 easily and should

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil tutorial - Oct 25 in Manassas VA

On 15/09/2011, at 1:42 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: I'm schedule to give a 3.5 hour in-depth tutorial on Fossil on Tuesday, Oct 25 from 09:00 to 12:30 in Manassas VA as part of the 2011 Tcl/Tk conference. See http://www.tcl.tk/community/tcl2011/schedule.html for schedule and registration

Re: [fossil-users] enable -Wall/-Werror?

On 09/09/2011, at 12:13 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: Hi, all! Is there a way, using the new config process, to enable -Wall and -Werror? i find it painful building without them. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ ___

Re: [fossil-users] The autosetup, and readline

On 02/09/2011, at 6:24 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 06:15:54PM +1000, Steve Bennett wrote: Thanks. Can you test this patch for me it see if it helps? Now it outputs: Checking for zlib.h...ok Checking libs for inflateEnd...-lz Checking for system ssl...ok

Re: [fossil-users] The autosetup, and readline

On 02/09/2011, at 6:24 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 06:15:54PM +1000, Steve Bennett wrote: Thanks. Can you test this patch for me it see if it helps? Now it outputs: Checking for zlib.h...ok Checking libs for inflateEnd...-lz Checking for system ssl...ok

Re: [fossil-users] Silencing warnings about deprecated OpenSSL on OS X

On 02/09/2011, at 7:27 PM, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: Well, you could just do this (see attached patch). Thanks! But should it be restricted to when compiling http_ssl? To Mac OS X? To 10.7? I think restricting it to just Mac OS X is okay. We know that they deprecated OpenSSL, and we

Re: [fossil-users] Build issue and ticket creation

On 02/09/2011, at 12:36 PM, James Turner wrote: I've got two issues. First, Makefile.in was removed when the symlinks branch was merged into trunk [0]. Because of this I get the below build error when I run ./configure: Error: Template Makefile.in is missing Try: 'configure --help' for

Re: [fossil-users] The autosetup, and readline

On 02/09/2011, at 7:43 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Does the autosetup detect 'readline' for all of you? For me, it says that it cannot find the 'readline' symbol in the lib. I've tried to understand the autosetup code, and I found a trick that makes it work, but I cannot tell why.

[fossil-users] Question on short-lived branches in fossil

So I created the 'autosetup' branch and added a commit which drh then merged to trunk. Is that branch now defunct? If I want to propose some more, related changes, do I create a new branch, say autosetup2, or do I continue or resurrect the autosetup branch? If so, how? Thanks, Steve -- µWeb:

Re: [fossil-users] Avoiding problems with fossil default Makefile (Steve Bennett)

On 21/07/2011, at 5:24 PM, Ben Summers wrote: On 21 Jul 2011, at 07:42, Steve Bennett wrote: On 20/07/2011, at 7:16 PM, Ben Summers wrote: I'm concerned that typing 'make' on obscure platforms builds subtly broken binaries. For example, on Solaris, it'll build one which truncates

Re: [fossil-users] Avoiding problems with fossil default Makefile (Steve Bennett)

On 21/07/2011, at 10:43 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:26:25AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.auwrote: On 21/07/2011, at 5:24 PM, Ben Summers wrote: Probably makes sense

Re: [fossil-users] Avoiding problems with fossil default Makefile (Steve Bennett)

On 21/07/2011, at 11:48 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:34:28PM +1000, Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/07/2011, at 10:43 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: Just to understand the situation... fossil 1.18 has a broken configure

Re: [fossil-users] Avoiding problems with fossil default Makefile (Steve Bennett)

On 21/07/2011, at 10:26 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote: On 21/07/2011, at 5:24 PM, Ben Summers wrote: Probably makes sense to rename Makefile to Makefile.classic and have configure create Makefile from Makefile.in though

Re: [fossil-users] Avoiding problems with fossil default Makefile

On 22/07/2011, at 12:06 PM, Doug Currie wrote: On OSX 10.6.8... I've installed a few macports programs; this creates /opt, and puts /opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin on the front of my PATH environment variable. I'd like to build fossil with the system's /usr includes and libraries, and

Re: [fossil-users] Avoiding problems with fossil default Makefile

On 20/07/2011, at 7:16 PM, Ben Summers wrote: I'm concerned that typing 'make' on obscure platforms builds subtly broken binaries. For example, on Solaris, it'll build one which truncates your passwords to 8 characters. I propose that we whitelist platforms where the default Makefile is

Re: [fossil-users] Supporting markwon syntax for wiki

On 21/07/2011, at 6:14 AM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: On Jul 20, 2011, at 21:18 , Eric wrote: +1 Oh, for heaven's sake! We did this before: 1) there's no pleasing everybody (we all have our different favourites) But most people agree that any of

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup and GNUmakefile

On 14/07/2011, at 7:03 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk wrote: If I run the ./configure script, Solaris make (which isn't GNU make) will ignore GNUmakefile and build a broken binary again! The maintainer of GNU Make, Paul Smith,

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] Update autosetup to support Solaris

On 14/07/2011, at 10:05 PM, Dan Kennedy wrote: On 07/14/2011 02:31 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: Hi All, I have worked with Ben Summers to resolve some small issues with autosetup on Solaris (mostly related to the fact that Solaris doesn't have a posix-compliant shell in /bin/sh

Re: [fossil-users] optimize size of binary

On 13/07/2011, at 10:35 PM, Rene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:48:42 +0200, Müller, Rainer wrote: Hello, I want to use fossil on an ARM based platform. We have only a few MB flash, so i tried to strip the binary - but the best result was about 1.1MB. I read that someone managed to build

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.18

On 14/07/2011, at 10:01 AM, Martin S. Weber wrote: On 07/13/11 19:27, Richard Hipp wrote: I have tagged the release of Fossil version 1.18. You can pickup a copy at http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html Comments on the download page enumerate the changes in this release. This is no

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.18

On 14/07/2011, at 12:05 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: On 14/07/2011, at 10:01 AM, Martin S. Weber wrote: On 07/13/11 19:27, Richard Hipp wrote: I have tagged the release of Fossil version 1.18. You can pickup a copy at http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html Comments on the download page

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.18

On 14/07/2011, at 9:27 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: I have tagged the release of Fossil version 1.18. You can pickup a copy at http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html Comments on the download page enumerate the changes in this release. This is no compelling reason to upgrade - it just

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

On 10/07/2011, at 6:28 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote: On Wed, July 6, 2011 6:11 am, Steve Bennett wrote: Hi Richard, I really dislike autoconf - a feeling cultivated through years of experience trying to use it. And I think I'm probably

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote: On Wed, July 6, 2011 6:11 am, Steve Bennett wrote: Hi Richard, I really dislike autoconf - a feeling cultivated through years of experience trying to use it. And I think I'm probably not alone in that feeling. You are very much

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

On 07/07/2011, at 2:22 PM, Matt Welland wrote: As an end user this appears to the best alternative I've seen so far. The fact that autosetup presents a familiar ./configure make interface is fantastic - if it really works as advertised. Does the cross compilation really work? I'd really

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

On 07/07/2011, at 7:30 AM, Eric wrote: On Wed, July 6, 2011 6:11 am, Steve Bennett wrote: Hi Richard, I really dislike autoconf - a feeling cultivated through years of experience trying to use it. And I think I'm probably not alone in that feeling. You are very much not alone. See

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

Hi Richard, I really dislike autoconf - a feeling cultivated through years of experience trying to use it. And I think I'm probably not alone in that feeling. You are very much not alone. See http://msteveb.github.com/autosetup/why/ I've tried to avoid having to use autoconf in Fossil and