On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:06:34AM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Martin Gagnon wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure if this protection is necessary, but if it is, it doesn't
> > get triggered if the symlink point directly to "../../dir3/other_ckout"
> > since the "top of a checkout" check only happens f
Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if this protection is necessary, but if it is, it doesn't
> get triggered if the symlink point directly to "../../dir3/other_ckout"
> since the "top of a checkout" check only happens for the recursive call.
>
I believe this may be to protect against file sys
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:10:52PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Martin Gagnon wrote:
> >
> > Strange, "fossil add a_dir_symlink" doesn't works for the case #2 on my
> > actual repository, but if I try to reproduce the problem on a brand new
> > repo, everything works.. Probably I hit a strang
Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> Strange, "fossil add a_dir_symlink" doesn't works for the case #2 on my
> actual repository, but if I try to reproduce the problem on a brand new
> repo, everything works.. Probably I hit a strange corner case. I will
> try to investigate a bit more..
>
I've added the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 02:29:58PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Martin Gagnon wrote:
> >
> > But if I do:
> > $ fossil add a_dir_symlink/*
> >
> > It add the content.
> >
> > Actually, may be it was intended ?
> >
>
> The way it should work (on the branch) is:
>
> 1. With allowSymlin
Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> But if I do:
> $ fossil add a_dir_symlink/*
>
> It add the content.
>
> Actually, may be it was intended ?
>
The way it should work (on the branch) is:
1. With allowSymlinks ON, symlinks to both files and
directories are always treated as "normal" co
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 01:11:39PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Martin Gagnon wrote:
> >
> > $ fossil add a_dir_symlink
> >
> > Nothing happens...
> >
>
> It was a bit more complex than I thought, made a couple more changes.
>
> Hopefully, it will work better now.
Same result with [b3f
Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> $ fossil add a_dir_symlink
>
> Nothing happens...
>
It was a bit more complex than I thought, made a couple more changes.
Hopefully, it will work better now.
--
Joe Mistachkin @ https://urn.to/r/mistachkin
___
fossil-use
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:37:10PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Changes on the "symlinks" branch prevent directory symlinks
> from being traversed into if the "allow-symlinks" setting is
> enabled or the "--no-dir-symlinks" flag is specified.
>
> Making this change work correctly also require
Changes on the "symlinks" branch prevent directory symlinks
from being traversed into if the "allow-symlinks" setting is
enabled or the "--no-dir-symlinks" flag is specified.
Making this change work correctly also required removing the
forced override of the cached "allow-symlinks" setting from
t
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:25:01PM -0700, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Warren Young wrote:
> >
> > Well, that's a tricky one, innit? Fossil manages files, not directories,
> > but Fossil's view of symlinks is file-like. So is it an apple or an
> > orange?
> >
>
> I've checked in a fix on the dirS
On Oct 28, 2016, at 3:29 PM, Steven Gawroriski
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 21:25:01 -0700
> "Joe Mistachkin" wrote:
>
>> I've checked in a fix on the dirSymlinks branch that appears to
>> completely fix the issue I personally encountered.
>>
>> I would appreciate wider testing of it.
>
>
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 21:25:01 -0700
"Joe Mistachkin" wrote:
>
> Warren Young wrote:
> >
> > Well, that's a tricky one, innit? Fossil manages files, not
> > directories, but Fossil's view of symlinks is file-like. So is it
> > an apple or an orange?
> >
>
> I've checked in a fix on the dirSyml
Warren Young wrote:
>
> Well, that's a tricky one, innit? Fossil manages files, not directories,
> but Fossil's view of symlinks is file-like. So is it an apple or an
> orange?
>
I've checked in a fix on the dirSymlinks branch that appears to completely
fix the issue I personally encountered.
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:41:11 -0600
Warren Young wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Joe Mistachkin
> wrote:
> >
> > Are having directory symlinks (on Unix) supposed to be supported?
> > If not, is anybody willing to help me add support for them?
>
> Well, that’s a tricky one, innit? Fossil
On Sep 30, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Are having directory symlinks (on Unix) supposed to be supported?
> If not, is anybody willing to help me add support for them?
Well, that’s a tricky one, innit? Fossil manages files, not directories, but
Fossil’s view of symlinks is file-
Are having directory symlinks (on Unix) supposed to be supported?
If not, is anybody willing to help me add support for them?
--
Joe Mistachkin @ https://urn.to/r/mistachkin
___
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.f
17 matches
Mail list logo
