On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:06:34AM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Martin Gagnon wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure if this protection is necessary, but if it is, it doesn't
> > get triggered if the symlink point directly to "../../dir3/other_ckout"
> > since the "top of a checkout" check only happens
Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if this protection is necessary, but if it is, it doesn't
> get triggered if the symlink point directly to "../../dir3/other_ckout"
> since the "top of a checkout" check only happens for the recursive call.
>
I believe this may be to protect against file
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:10:52PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Martin Gagnon wrote:
> >
> > Strange, "fossil add a_dir_symlink" doesn't works for the case #2 on my
> > actual repository, but if I try to reproduce the problem on a brand new
> > repo, everything works.. Probably I hit a
Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> Strange, "fossil add a_dir_symlink" doesn't works for the case #2 on my
> actual repository, but if I try to reproduce the problem on a brand new
> repo, everything works.. Probably I hit a strange corner case. I will
> try to investigate a bit more..
>
I've added the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 02:29:58PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Martin Gagnon wrote:
> >
> > But if I do:
> > $ fossil add a_dir_symlink/*
> >
> > It add the content.
> >
> > Actually, may be it was intended ?
> >
>
> The way it should work (on the branch) is:
>
> 1. With
Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> But if I do:
> $ fossil add a_dir_symlink/*
>
> It add the content.
>
> Actually, may be it was intended ?
>
The way it should work (on the branch) is:
1. With allowSymlinks ON, symlinks to both files and
directories are always treated as "normal"
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 01:11:39PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Martin Gagnon wrote:
> >
> > $ fossil add a_dir_symlink
> >
> > Nothing happens...
> >
>
> It was a bit more complex than I thought, made a couple more changes.
>
> Hopefully, it will work better now.
Same result with
Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> $ fossil add a_dir_symlink
>
> Nothing happens...
>
It was a bit more complex than I thought, made a couple more changes.
Hopefully, it will work better now.
--
Joe Mistachkin @ https://urn.to/r/mistachkin
___
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:37:10PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Changes on the "symlinks" branch prevent directory symlinks
> from being traversed into if the "allow-symlinks" setting is
> enabled or the "--no-dir-symlinks" flag is specified.
>
> Making this change work correctly also
Changes on the "symlinks" branch prevent directory symlinks
from being traversed into if the "allow-symlinks" setting is
enabled or the "--no-dir-symlinks" flag is specified.
Making this change work correctly also required removing the
forced override of the cached "allow-symlinks" setting from
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:25:01PM -0700, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Warren Young wrote:
> >
> > Well, that's a tricky one, innit? Fossil manages files, not directories,
> > but Fossil's view of symlinks is file-like. So is it an apple or an
> > orange?
> >
>
> I've checked in a fix on the
On Oct 28, 2016, at 3:29 PM, Steven Gawroriski
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 21:25:01 -0700
> "Joe Mistachkin" wrote:
>
>> I've checked in a fix on the dirSymlinks branch that appears to
>> completely fix the issue I personally encountered.
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 21:25:01 -0700
"Joe Mistachkin" wrote:
>
> Warren Young wrote:
> >
> > Well, that's a tricky one, innit? Fossil manages files, not
> > directories, but Fossil's view of symlinks is file-like. So is it
> > an apple or an orange?
> >
>
> I've checked
Warren Young wrote:
>
> Well, that's a tricky one, innit? Fossil manages files, not directories,
> but Fossil's view of symlinks is file-like. So is it an apple or an
> orange?
>
I've checked in a fix on the dirSymlinks branch that appears to completely
fix the issue I personally encountered.
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:41:11 -0600
Warren Young wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Joe Mistachkin
> wrote:
> >
> > Are having directory symlinks (on Unix) supposed to be supported?
> > If not, is anybody willing to help me add support for them?
>
>
On Sep 30, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Are having directory symlinks (on Unix) supposed to be supported?
> If not, is anybody willing to help me add support for them?
Well, that’s a tricky one, innit? Fossil manages files, not directories, but
Fossil’s
Are having directory symlinks (on Unix) supposed to be supported?
If not, is anybody willing to help me add support for them?
--
Joe Mistachkin @ https://urn.to/r/mistachkin
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
17 matches
Mail list logo