Re: [fossil-users] Objections to merging stash-fixes branch?

2016-09-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Wed, 07 Sep 2016 20:00:03 -0700: > FYI, I've modified your branch to re-merge changes from trunk without > the changes for OpenSSL 1.1.0, which is not quite ready for primetime > yet. Thanks for the heads up. The nice thing about Fossil is that it makes this

Re: [fossil-users] Objections to merging stash-fixes branch?

2016-09-07 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Andy Bradford wrote: > > Any objections to merging the stash-fixes branch? > Andy, FYI, I've modified your branch to re-merge changes from trunk without the changes for OpenSSL 1.1.0, which is not quite ready for primetime yet. Jan, I think the MSVC makefile needs updating for the OpenSSL

[fossil-users] Objections to merging stash-fixes branch?

2016-09-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, Any objections to merging the stash-fixes branch? Basically, by changing the primary key, it is possible to track renames in a stash: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/vdiff?from=b03f15635dd356be=1912b2f864a746bb=1 In addition to creating a new schema for new checkouts, it will