Re: [fossil-users] Repo Checksum Speedup Idea: flaw in my comment

2016-12-06 Thread Eduardo Morras
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:23:50 +0200 Martin Vahi wrote: > As it turns out, I already made a mistake > at the tree based algorithm. > > The old, proposed, flawed version: > > ... > > array_of_nodes_with_wrong_x_node_hash=unique_by_node_ID( > >

[fossil-users] Repo Checksum Speedup Idea: flaw in my comment

2016-12-05 Thread Martin Vahi
As it turns out, I already made a mistake at the tree based algorithm. The old, proposed, flawed version: > ... > array_of_nodes_with_wrong_x_node_hash=unique_by_node_ID( > clone( > ob_AVL_tree.array_of_nodes_that_had_changes_on_path_2_root >

[fossil-users] Repo Checksum Speedup Idea

2016-12-05 Thread Martin Vahi
> De : Joerg Sonnenberger > À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > Envoyé le : Dimanche 4 décembre 2016 20h55 > Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source > ... > No. What repo checksum does is compute a separate checksum over