On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:51:11 +0300, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
First of all, thank you Thomas (and you Richard!) for such a nice feature.
Regarding name of the command I'm agree 'service' and 'server' commands
are confusing, since theya re very close by meanings. However, I don't
On 19.07.2011 06:16, Jeremy Anderson wrote:
Other platforms could either re-direct it (e.g., fossil service becomes an
alias for fossil server), or just print a message saying that the command
is only valid for Windows operating systems.
On non Windows platforms, fossil service prints the
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Jeremy Anderson jere...@gmail.com wrote:
I currently host fossil server as a window service via NSSM. fossil
service gets my vote. simple to the point.
i would argue for the win prefix because 'service' is used on other
platforms as well, e.g. Solaris SMF
Why not make an option e.g.
fossil server -service?
--
Rene
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Why not make an option e.g.
fossil server -service?
+1 :)
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
___
fossil-users mailing list
On 19.07.2011 15:42, Rene wrote:
Why not make an option e.g.
fossil server -service?
because the service command consists of several sub-commands?
--
tsbg
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
is
a workable alternative.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
To: fossil-users fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 10:51 PM
Subject: [fossil-users] The fossil service command
Thomas Schnurrenberger's fossil service command - for running Fossil
On 7/19/2011 11:27 AM, Paul wrote:
Is service really that confusing?
I'm more concerned that `fossil serv` becomes ambiguous. (fossil allows
unambiguous short versions of all its commands.)
--
Joshua Paine
LetterBlock: Web Applications Built With Joy
http://letterblock.com/
301-576-1920
alternative.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
To: fossil-users fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 10:51 PM
Subject: [fossil-users] The fossil service command
Thomas Schnurrenberger's fossil service command - for running Fossil
On 19.07.2011 17:47, Ramon Ribó wrote:
In my opinion, the name service is too generic and too windows
specific. Fossil can give us a lot of services, apart from using the
Windows services feature.
I agree with another poster that a good solution could be to make it
a subcommand of server.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Thomas Schnurrenberger t...@gmx.net wrote:
It is probably better to change the command-name from service
to e.g. winsvc
+1 vote for winsvc/winserve/winservice (no hyphen)
___
fossil-users mailing list
I vote for
fossil server --service
or something similar.
-Original Message-
From: Wes Freeman
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:18 PM
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] The fossil service command
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Thomas Schnurrenberger t
fossil server ?-P|--port TCPPORT? ?--service-install?
?--service-remove? ?REPOSITORY?
I don't think that this a good idea because the service command
has several sub-commands.
It is probably better to change the command-name from service
to e.g. winsvc
Althouth winsvc could also be a good
Just read through the code. Got a few comments:
These errors:
if( g.argc4 ) fossil_fatal(to much arguments for delete method.);
if( g.argc4 ) fossil_fatal(to much arguments for show method.);
if( g.argc4 ) fossil_fatal(to much arguments for create method.);
if( g.argc4 ) fossil_fatal(to much
On 19.07.2011 18:36, Ramon Ribó wrote:
Althouth winsvc could also be a good solution, what other sub commands,
appart
from install and remove do you really need?
You don't need the service command at all. There are command line
utilities and/or GUI's in the Windows OS which have the required
The fossil service command is a convenience command for Windows users
who
are not system administrators. It concentrates the necessary functionality
where it
is needed
I agree with it. So my proposal was to add the minimal functionality to the
command:
fossil server --install-service
fossil
Thomas Schnurrenberger's fossil service command - for running Fossil as a
windows service - is now on the trunk. But I wonder: The name of this
command is very similar to fossil server and might be confusing. Do we
need to change it to something more distinctive? Perhaps fossil wservice
or
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
something more distinctive? Perhaps fossil wservice or fossil
win-serve. Other ideas?
i'd prefer win-service, but i don't use windows so i don't get a vote.
or maybe:
fossil M$ervice
;)
--
- stephan beal
: Ron Wilson
Sent: 07/19/11 04:03 AM
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] The fossil service command
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
something
or run-time)
for non-windows platforms.
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wilson
Sent: 07/19/11 04:03 AM
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] The fossil service command
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Mon
20 matches
Mail list logo
