Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-06 Thread altufaltu
vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun) I get the two points of view and I'm not saying one is right or wrong. Modifying the history versus keeping everything as indeed happens (the history after all) Yesterday I was confused because I though the shun was done in the big file

[fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:06:07PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: 2011/10/5 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com: git looks to me as a tool for publishing development steps, not necessarily very related to the development history. The 'git version graph' is determined by the users

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:24:30 +0200 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: [...] And when you find an issue with a commit that is some way back in your personal branch it is more logical and easier to review your branch if you append the fix to the commit where it belongs

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Mike Meyer
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: That sort of we don't need it, we don't need it mantra is a typical case of the famous Blub paradox. I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to rewrite history and another one

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 5 October 2011 20:12, Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: That sort of we don't need it, we don't need it mantra is a typical case of the famous Blub paradox. I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:12:31 -0700 Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: That sort of we don't need it, we don't need it mantra is a typical case of the famous Blub paradox. I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to rewrite history and another one which doesn't, the first

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Mike Meyer
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.czwrote: On 5 October 2011 20:12, Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: That sort of we don't need it, we don't need it mantra is a

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Erlis Vidal
I get the two points of view and I'm not saying one is right or wrong. Modifying the history versus keeping everything as indeed happens (the history after all) Yesterday I was confused because I though the shun was done in the big file, but indeed the shun was done in the commit also... will