Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: > > In the meantime I've tried the desperate trick: > > % fossil merge --integrate --force aa9521ccd9 > > but the leaf is still listed on the open ones. > As Richard said, it's not a real problem. I would suggest you

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

On 6/7/16, Luca Ferrari wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> No. Can you make the repo available for analysis? >> > > Sorry, my employer does not grant me to do it. Is there anything I can > export that can be useful? The repo

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > No. Can you make the repo available for analysis? > Sorry, my employer does not grant me to do it. Is there anything I can export that can be useful? The repo is actually 800+MB. In the meantime I've tried the desperate

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

On 6/6/16, Luca Ferrari wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Luca Ferrari > wrote: >> The commit is marked as merged and the branch is shown in the closed >> list, am I missing something? >> What could happen if I try to reclose the open leaves?

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Luca Ferrari wrote: > The commit is marked as merged and the branch is shown in the closed > list, am I missing something? > What could happen if I try to reclose the open leaves? Anyone has an idea of what is fossil telling me? Just for

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:50:01PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote: >> So the branch 'feature-installazioni' is closed, and is merged. >> I'm a little confused. > > A merge doesn't automatically close a branch, it must be

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:50:01PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote: > So the branch 'feature-installazioni' is closed, and is merged. > I'm a little confused. A merge doesn't automatically close a branch, it must be instructed so. Joerg ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: > WARNING: multiple open leaf check-ins on trunk: > (1) 2016-05-30 15:25:09 [fc75337a99] (current) > (2) 2015-11-19 14:08:50 [aa9521ccd9] > (3) 2015-08-26 08:18:19 [c413c4592a] I've tried to inspect one of the open

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: >> Maybe the LEAF table in the database file is somehow out of sync. >> Have you tried running "fossil rebuild" to see if that clears the >> problem? > > Or the more light-weight "fossil leaves --recompute" for starters.

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:49:47AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 5/30/16, Luca Ferrari wrote: > > Hi all, > > I suspect I did not get right the multiple open leaf warning: > > > > Maybe the LEAF table in the database file is somehow out of sync. > Have you tried running

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

On 5/30/16, Luca Ferrari wrote: > Hi all, > I suspect I did not get right the multiple open leaf warning: > Maybe the LEAF table in the database file is somehow out of sync. Have you tried running "fossil rebuild" to see if that clears the problem? -- D. Richard Hipp

[fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

Hi all, I suspect I did not get right the multiple open leaf warning: % fossil stat ... checkout: fc75337a991c9a1156735b1eca3f9cdd0d2ca70f 2016-05-30 15:25:09 UTC parent: e7c2399f591e36e1ec947dfb7b034b2c02697b4b 2016-05-30 12:37:08 UTC tags: trunk ... WARNING: multiple open leaf