Le 02/09/2013 18:36, Stephan Beal a écrit :
Hi, all,
i'm looking to prioritize some work on libfossil and i got the idea to
try
to find out which commands people use most often, and use that to help
me
prioritize.
Hi!
My main fossil usage is to sync my projects between two computers by
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Étienne Deparis etie...@depar.is wrote:
In fact, I use a lot of status and extra automatically as I'm using
liquidprompt
(https://github.com/nojhan/**liquidprompthttps://github.com/nojhan/liquidprompt)
for which I've added fossil support.
Thanks for that tip
On 9/2/2013 9:36 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
i'm looking to prioritize some work on libfossil and i got the idea to
try to find out which commands people use most often, and use that to
help me prioritize.
I wonder how hard it would be for fossil to (optionally) keep the
statistics you are
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com wrote:
I wonder how hard it would be for fossil to (optionally) keep the
statistics you are interested in?
That's an interesting question. Keeping them locally would be very little
work, actually.
Add a table keyed by fossil
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Sergei Gavrikov
sergei.gavri...@gmail.comwrote:
history | gawk \
'{if($2==f||$2==fossil)s[$3]++}END{for(i in s)print s[i],i}'|sort -Vr
Nice use of awk! That one is going in my notes. -V doesn't work on the sort
available for me but -nr works nice. I keep
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
All assuming of course that fossil won't be upset by extraneous stuff in
the global_config table.
AFAIK we have no mechanisms in place for managing the contents of that db.
Hmm... off topic but interesting, apparently
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com wrote:
I wonder how hard it would be for fossil to (optionally) keep the
statistics you are interested in?
That's an interesting question. Keeping
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
That's a very good idea. Added to my list. Thanks!
This isn't checked in yet, but a prototype is in place which automatically
updates the stats only for CLI mode and only if the command succeeds (i.e.
if it does not
It seems for me it's good to know and the less-used commands :-)
Yesterday I checked my list as
% history | gawk \
'{if($2==f||$2==fossil)s[$3]++}END{for(i in s)print s[i],i}'|sort -Vr
Sergei
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Ross Berteig
Hi, all,
i'm looking to prioritize some work on libfossil and i got the idea to try
to find out which commands people use most often, and use that to help me
prioritize.
So... which fossil CLI commands do you use most often, NOT counting the
following (which are more or less required for any
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 06:36:42PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
(...) So... which fossil CLI commands do you use most often, NOT counting the
following (which are more or less required for any real work): (...)
changes
add/addremove/rm/mv
stash
merge
(settings? remote-url?)
would be what
revert, init(new), extra, rm, mv, gdiff, merge, ls
--
Mobile == toppost brief;
Martin G.
Le 2 sept. 2013 12:36, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com a écrit :
Hi, all,
i'm looking to prioritize some work on libfossil and i got the idea to try
to find out which commands people use most
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 06:36:42PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
i'm looking to prioritize some work on libfossil and i got the idea to try
to find out which commands people use most often, and use that to help me
prioritize.
Recursive add and revert would be the biggest item :)
Joerg
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
jo...@britannica.bec.dewrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 06:36:42PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
i'm looking to prioritize some work on libfossil and i got the idea to
try
to find out which commands people use most often, and use that to help me
status
stash
merge
'branch ls'
undo/revert
I prefer status to changes because it shows me where I'm coming from
(current checkout and branch). I use it by habit after every phone call,
coffee break, and misc interruption, so I'd bet probably more than any
other command.
On Monday, September 2,
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 07:30:01PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
@All:
Your answers surprise me a bit, guys. addremove, really? i've never used
that one, either.
I find it easy to bring my checkout to the state I want the DB to reflect
and then just go ahead and do so in a single swoop. Getting
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Themba Fletcher
themba.fletc...@gmail.comwrote:
I prefer status to changes because it shows me where I'm coming from
(current checkout and branch). I use it by habit after every phone call,
coffee break, and misc interruption, so I'd bet probably more than any
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Martin S. Weber ephae...@gmx.net wrote:
I find it easy to bring my checkout to the state I want the DB to reflect
and then just go ahead and do so in a single swoop. Getting (all) files
in place and teaching fossil about it is one of my use cases, if you
will.
On 2 September 2013 18:36, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
i'm looking to prioritize some work on libfossil and i got the idea to try
to find out which commands people use most often, and use that to help me
prioritize.
one more 'addremove' fan.
when: gather external docs like
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 07:54:35PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Martin S. Weber ephae...@gmx.net wrote:
I find it easy to bring my checkout to the state I want the DB to reflect
and then just go ahead and do so in a single swoop. Getting (all) files
in place
For some irrational reason I avoid addremove as well. I find myself piping
fossil changes through grep and awk and then xargs-ing back to fossil rm or
add whenever it comes up - and I *know* that addremove will do the same
thing.
I just can't bring myself to use it :)
On Monday, September 2,
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Martin S. Weber ephae...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 07:30:01PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
@All:
Your answers surprise me a bit, guys. addremove, really? i've never used
that one, either.
I find it easy to bring my checkout to the state I want
22 matches
Mail list logo
