On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:44:17 -0700 (PDT), Gé Weijers wrote:
I have submitted a bug report on this issue. The 'tar' format has
been extended over the years, and it's now a fairly interesting mess.
File names over 100 bytes are split into two. Posix requires this to
be done at a '/' (which you
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Rene wrote:
Thanks for the bug report. I wonder are you able to get the same
(mis)behavior
out of fossil as I did out of my repository?
Yes, it's reproducible. Once the file path length goes over 100 characters
the file quite reliably does not come out right. All the
I have submitted a bug report on this issue. The 'tar' format has been
extended over the years, and it's now a fairly interesting mess.
File names over 100 bytes are split into two. Posix requires this to be
done at a '/' (which you can delete). Fossil splits it anywhere, which
confuses all
I have converted a cvs repo to fossil.
I checked if the tag release_v5_1_0 would yield the same number of
files
as you can see from this timeline fragment it is version 186f4fdca4
[186f4fdca4] brokerhost geintroduceert
* Upd mxflex/gbo/app_po.inc: 1.39
* Upd mxflex/gbo/app_bo.inc: 1.36
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I have converted a cvs repo to fossil.
I checked if the tag release_v5_1_0 would yield the same number of
files
as you can see from this timeline fragment it is version 186f4fdca4
[186f4fdca4] brokerhost geintroduceert
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:38:07 -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Rene wrote:
I have converted a cvs repo to fossil.
I checked if the tag release_v5_1_0 would yield the same number of
files
as you can see from this timeline fragment it is version
186f4fdca4
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
It must be something specific for this repo because if I do a tarball
from my local
copy of fossil (hence the same version) I don't see multiple
directories.
What version of Fossil are you running on the server, and what
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:15:50 -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Rene wrote:
It must be something specific for this repo because if I do a
tarball
from my local
copy of fossil (hence the same version) I don't see multiple
directories.
What version of Fossil are
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:15:50 -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Rene wrote:
It must be something specific for this repo because if I do a
tarball
from my local
copy of fossil (hence the same version) I don't see multiple
directories.
What version of Fossil are
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:15:50 -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Rene wrote:
It must be something specific for this repo because if I do a
tarball
from my local
copy of fossil (hence the same version) I don't see multiple
directories.
What version of Fossil are
The old tar 'v7' format only supports file names up to 99 characters,
according to the GNU tar documentation.
The check in 'tar_add_header' (tar.c) checks for nName 100.
The file name that gets mangled is exactly 100 chars long
Gé
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Rene wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011
11 matches
Mail list logo