Re: [fossil-users] trunk closed??

2015-05-30 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 29/05/15 22:15, Matt Welland wrote: We emphatically do NOT want Fossil second-guessing what branch you want to be on when you do fossil update without an argument. Whatever option you decide - either way you are second guessing the users intent. 1. Current behavior is really, really

Re: [fossil-users] trunk closed??

2015-05-29 Thread Matt Welland
This is an exceedingly confusing behavior from fossil but the fix is easy. Just do fossil up trunk. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 5/28/15, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, I follow and update from trunk pretty

Re: [fossil-users] trunk closed??

2015-05-29 Thread jungle Boogie
On 29 May 2015 at 08:38, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 5/29/15, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote: This is an exceedingly confusing behavior from fossil but the fix is easy. Just do fossil up trunk. Indeed - Fossil is doing exactly the right thing here. If you just fossil

Re: [fossil-users] trunk closed??

2015-05-29 Thread Richard Hipp
On 5/29/15, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote: This is an exceedingly confusing behavior from fossil but the fix is easy. Just do fossil up trunk. Indeed - Fossil is doing exactly the right thing here. If you just fossil update it advances you to the tip of whatever branch your are

Re: [fossil-users] trunk closed??

2015-05-29 Thread j. van den hoff
On Fri, 29 May 2015 17:38:39 +0200, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 5/29/15, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote: This is an exceedingly confusing behavior from fossil but the fix is easy. Just do fossil up trunk. Indeed - Fossil is doing exactly the right thing here. If you

Re: [fossil-users] trunk closed??

2015-05-29 Thread Rolf Ade
Matt Welland writes: We emphatically do NOT want Fossil second-guessing what branch you want to be on when you do fossil update without an argument. [...] The right thing from a user perspective is to either WARN the user that the branch was swizzled out from under them or WARN them and

Re: [fossil-users] trunk closed??

2015-05-29 Thread Matt Welland
We emphatically do NOT want Fossil second-guessing what branch you want to be on when you do fossil update without an argument. Whatever option you decide - either way you are second guessing the users intent. 1. Current behavior is really, really confusing. 2. You *were* on trunk but magically

Re: [fossil-users] trunk closed??

2015-05-28 Thread Richard Hipp
On 5/28/15, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, I follow and update from trunk pretty regularly...this is how I notice those harmless compiler warnings from time-to-time. I update on a few different machines, too, so I don't know how I would have made this mistake on

[fossil-users] trunk closed??

2015-05-28 Thread jungle Boogie
Hello All, I follow and update from trunk pretty regularly...this is how I notice those harmless compiler warnings from time-to-time. I update on a few different machines, too, so I don't know how I would have made this mistake on multiple machines. For some reason, my fossil thinks I'm in this