On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Timothy Beyer bey...@fastmail.net wrote:
At Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:52:59 -0400,
James Turner wrote:
After a couple weeks of debate, I've decided to shut down Chiselapp.com.
I think that the Fossil project should aim to have at least one official
host
to
Hi,
I have used Chiselapp for hosting some Fossil project but just got a
note that he is shutting down May first. So I decided to try the source forge
version (http://fossilrepos.sourceforge.net/) . Very easy to create a project
but my previous experience with Chisel seems to not to
Thank you, James, for Chiselapp. I'm sorry to see it go.
On Mar 29, 2013, at 7:55 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
(5) Require unpaid accounts to be open-source?
One of the most important things that drew me to Chiselapp, and to using Fossil
for personal projects, was free private
Op 29-3-2013 1:52, James Turner schreef:
After a couple weeks of debate, I've decided to shut down Chiselapp.com.
As the message on the homepage states, new account and repository
creation has been disabled. Access to the website and repositories will
remain open until May 1st 2013.
Sad to see
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:10:48 -0400
jim Schimpf jim.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have used Chiselapp for hosting some Fossil project but
just got a note that he is shutting down May first. So I decided to
try the source forge version (http://fossilrepos.sourceforge.net/) .
I'd like to
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Timothy Beyer bey...@fastmail.netwrote:
At Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:52:59 -0400,
James Turner wrote:
After a couple weeks of debate, I've decided to shut down Chiselapp.com.
I think that
One thing that would be really nice IMHO would be to provide a mechanism to
derive a repo from an existing one and have that connection clear and
visible on the site. This would have to be optional. Having support for
this inside a single fossil would be ideal from my perspective but I
understand
On Mar 29, 2013, at 15:34 , Richard Hipp wrote:
Yes, I suppose there really ought to be a hosting service for Fossil
someplace So I'm exploring the option of setting up a new one.
What if we were to extend Fossil itself so that it was capable of hosting
multiple projects after the
Just wondering why we need a dedicated fossil hosting service.
I have managed for years without.
For example: Copy fossil repository to dropbox folder; make folder
publicly available, or privately share it. Done!
Am I missing something?
James
On 03/29/2013 09:29 AM, James Bremner wrote:
Just wondering why we need a dedicated fossil hosting service.
I have managed for years without.
For example: Copy fossil repository to dropbox folder; make folder
publicly available, or privately share it. Done!
Am I missing something?
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:29 PM, James Bremner ja...@ravenspoint.comwrote:
Copy fossil repository to dropbox folder; make folder publicly available,
or privately share it. Done!
Huh. Very clever!
But surely this technique should at least be documented, right?
--
D. Richard Hipp
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:29:54PM +0100, Martijn Coppoolse wrote:
Op 29-3-2013 1:52, James Turner schreef:
After a couple weeks of debate, I've decided to shut down Chiselapp.com.
As the message on the homepage states, new account and repository
creation has been disabled. Access to the
James Turner james@... writes:
[message clipped]
The Chisel codebase, Flint, is available under the AGPLv3 license so if
your interested now is probably the time to grab it.
James, would you consider changing the license to something more permissive,
perhaps BSD-style, or at least the
A snag with using dropbox, or similar, as a replacement for a dedicated
fossil server has occurred to me.
When a person interacts with the repo, fossil will update the local copy
of the repo and then dropbox will synchronize all the different local
copies. On a busy repo where there might be
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Steve Havelka yo...@q7.com wrote:
Hmm...could I clone a repository directly from your Dropbox-hosted one?
Or push changes back to it?
This works to some degree (i've done it before) but breaks down if one or
more of the clients involved is offline for any
for what it's worth as compared to github you are missing:
Ability to browse and discover projects based on searches, tags and
developer.
Ability for loosely coupled collaboration (i.e. fork).
Community and the momentum that can come with it.
Project life beyond the initial developer.
On
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 05:09:46PM +, John Coulter wrote:
James Turner james@... writes:
[message clipped]
The Chisel codebase, Flint, is available under the AGPLv3 license so if
your interested now is probably the time to grab it.
James, would you consider changing the
Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:10:48 -0400
I'd like to point out this is not at all a source forge version.
This is just a regular SF project created by someone -- see for
yourself [1]. To my knowledge, SF does not provide Fossil hosting.
SF doesn't provide it, but it's
Matt Welland decía, en el mensaje Re: [fossil-users] Why do we need a fossil
hosting service? del Viernes, 29 de Marzo de 2013 14:38:25:
Ability for loosely coupled collaboration (i.e. fork).
Not exactly what Fossil was designed for, I believe...
Community and the momentum that can come with
On 03/29/2013 05:56 PM, Richie Adler wrote:
Matt Welland decía, en el mensaje Re: [fossil-users] Why do we need a fossil
hosting service? del Viernes, 29 de Marzo de 2013 14:38:25:
Ability for loosely coupled collaboration (i.e. fork).
Not exactly what Fossil was designed for, I believe...
20 matches
Mail list logo
