Hello,
I've converted (mostly from Git, but as well as from darcs btr) *all*
my repost to Fossil in order to exclusively use it and test it
thoroughly.
Now I experience some (strange) problem that I can't see GPG signatures
in my commits.
During commit I see the following:
You need a
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
Hello,
I've converted (mostly from Git, but as well as from darcs btr) *all*
my repost to Fossil in order to exclusively use it and test it
thoroughly.
Now I experience some (strange) problem that I can't see GPG signatures
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:47:42 -0400
Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
The PGP signature is recorded in the repository. (See, for example
the PGP signature on an early check-in to Fossil itself at
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/artifact/22c1ac41d4c02c44).
OK.
However, I have never added
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
Iow, I'd like an easy way to check whether the commit is signed or not,
possibly close to the 'SHA1 Hash:' label or something.
I'm also pretty sure that something like that was available or am I
dreaming...
I think you dreamed
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
Iow, I'd like an easy way to check whether the commit is signed or not,
possibly close to the 'SHA1 Hash:' label or something.
i recently some samething similar in the JimTCL timeline, where each commit
has a signed off by..., but
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
i've just written down a TODO to add this info to the timeline if it's not
terribly problematic. The main problem is that the timeline doesn't have
that level of data. Ah, but it could - we could still see the PGP key
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:58:49 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can you please try that out, Gour?
Here is output from configure:
gour@atmarama ~/t/fossil ./configure
Host System...x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Build System...x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
C compiler... cc -g -O2
C++
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:58:49 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can you please try that out, Gour?
Here is output from configure:
Do:
fossil co timeline-pgp-marker
./configure
make clean
make
./fossil rebuild
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:58:49 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can you please try that out, Gour?
Here is output from configure:
gour@atmarama ~/t/fossil ./configure
Try instead: ./configure
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:58:49 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can you please try that out, Gour?
My mistake...I mixed fossil versions for commit and ui.
It's OK, and it would be superb to e.g. have *PGP SIGNED* as hyperlink
to the artifact?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Not by merely
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
It's OK, and it would be superb to e.g. have *PGP SIGNED* as hyperlink
to the artifact?
To the raw manifest, you mean?
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:42:19 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
To the raw manifest, you mean?
Yes, to the one e.g. showed by Richard:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/artifact/22c1ac41d4c02c44
Sincerely,
Gour
--
One who is not disturbed in mind even amidst the threefold
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:42:19 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
To the raw manifest, you mean?
Yes, to the one e.g. showed by Richard:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/artifact/22c1ac41d4c02c44
Please do an
not a big deal but slightly irritating:
the tk-window opened by `diff --tk' is editable, i..e one can modify the
displayed diff text (w/o any real effect, of course). I don't know Tk, but
maybe there's an option to make the window readonly in order to avoid any
potential confusion (since
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:57 AM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
not a big deal but slightly irritating:
the tk-window opened by `diff --tk' is editable, i..e one can modify the
displayed diff text (w/o any real effect, of course). I don't know Tk, but
maybe there's an
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Benedikt Ahrens
benedikt.ahr...@gmx.netwrote:
is not feasible in my situation.
packages or libraries or deal with package managers. Just copy *one file*
into your $PATH on each machine
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Benedikt Ahrens benedikt.ahr...@gmx.netwrote:
It works fine with 1.26.
:)
BTW, is there any chance the Debian packaging could happen in a debian
branch of the fossil development repository, i.e. that the Debian fossil
maintainer get write access to that
Hello,
the fossil timeline command shows UTC time rather than observing the
system setting (UTC+02:00, in my case).
Is there anything I can do to change this?
fossil version is 1.26.
Thanks.
Benedikt
___
fossil-users mailing list
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:10:05 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please do an update, 'make', fossil rebuild, and try again. i'm not
terribly happy with how the link looks, but that seems to be the way
those links are supposed to be displayed in the timeline.
Yeah, functionality
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:31:24 +0200, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:57 AM, j. van den hoff
veedeeh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
not a big deal but slightly irritating:
the tk-window opened by `diff --tk' is editable, i..e one can modify
the
displayed diff text
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:59:11 +0200, Benedikt Ahrens
benedikt.ahr...@gmx.net wrote:
Hello,
the fossil timeline command shows UTC time rather than observing the
system setting (UTC+02:00, in my case).
Is there anything I can do to change this?
you can switch off UTC (so that it uses local
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:22 PM, j. van den hoff
veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote:
indeed, things are moving fast with fossil ;-)
This year is turning out to be one of the busier ones:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/reports?view=byyear
and recent activity has been pretty high:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:25 PM, j. van den hoff
veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:59:11 +0200, Benedikt Ahrens
benedikt.ahr...@gmx.net wrote:
Hello,
the fossil timeline command shows UTC time rather than observing the
system setting (UTC+02:00, in my case).
Is
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
Yeah, functionality is there, some cosmetic is required...link can point
to http://some-domain/artifact/id, but the link title can be e.g. just
*PGP-SIGNED* ?
i don't see a way to do that without hard-coding the link into the
I need to go back in the archives and see where I can find an example of
this but in the meantime to ask the obvious, is fossil verifying the
signatures as part of the commit process or does fossil simply carry the
data so the signature can be verified manually?
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:41:39 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
However... i don't want to move this to the trunk until i hear some
feedback from the devs whether this is the optimal solution or whether
something like a simple PGP would do.
Sure, let's hear what others can say...
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:07 PM, John Long codeb...@inbox.lv wrote:
I need to go back in the archives and see where I can find an example of
this but in the meantime to ask the obvious, is fossil verifying the
signatures as part of the commit process or does fossil simply carry the
data so
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:07 PM, John Long codeb...@inbox.lv wrote:
is fossil verifying the
signatures as part of the commit process or does fossil simply carry the
data so the signature can be verified manually?
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:32:21PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:07 PM, John Long codeb...@inbox.lv wrote:
I need to go back in the archives and see where I can find an example of
this but in the meantime to ask the obvious, is fossil verifying the
signatures as
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:39 PM, John Long codeb...@inbox.lv wrote:
If you're working on flagging PGP commits then it would be really nice to
say PGP in red if the signature doesn't verify or green if it does or
something like that. Otherwise saying PGP on a commit does more harm than
good
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:43:36PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:39 PM, John Long codeb...@inbox.lv wrote:
If you're working on flagging PGP commits then it would be really nice to
say PGP in red if the signature doesn't verify or green if it does or
something like
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:03 PM, John Long codeb...@inbox.lv wrote:
is called gpgme (gpg made easy) IIRC. I think it's not something you have
to
link and you should be able to tell if it's present or not.
i can't personally commit to it, but maybe someone who's listening can.
My
Given a shared hosting account where you want to host a Fossil
repository, where following the directions for CGI-based Fossil hosting
gives you access to the web UI via example.com/cgi-bin/access_name, I
would like to know what techniques people use to make it available via
something like one of
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote:
Given a shared hosting account where you want to host a Fossil
repository, where following the directions for CGI-based Fossil hosting
gives you access to the web UI via example.com/cgi-bin/access_name, I
would like to
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote:
# cat .htaccess
Options +ExecCGI +Indexes
IfModule mod_autoindex.c
IndexOptions FancyIndexing NameWidth=*
/ifModule
# doesn't work on my hoster :( AddHandler cgi-script .html
DirectoryIndex index.cgi index.php
Hi j.,
I'm responsible for the new and improved Tk diff and would like to
look into these problems. Send any screenshots and/or hate mail my way.
I'd also like to know what OS and Tcl/Tk version you're using.
j. van den hoff wrote:
however, regarding the _new_ Tk window (as of fossil version
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:25:05PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote:
Given a shared hosting account where you want to host a Fossil
repository, where following the directions for CGI-based Fossil hosting
gives you access to
Hey Richard,
I get the same problem every once in awhile. Many times actually. I
consider myself a heavy fossil user. My most active repository has 1087
checkins all made by me.
I once submitted a ticket about it here:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/tktview/f7879271cf4182d2?plaintext
I have not
On Aug 20, 2013 8:25 PM, Donny Ward donnyjw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Richard,
I get the same problem every once in awhile. Many times actually. I
consider myself a heavy fossil user. My most active repository has 1087
checkins all made by me.
I once submitted a ticket about it here:
39 matches
Mail list logo
