Re: [fossil-users] (New To Fossil): Repo Workflow / Should I Clone Or Use Many Opens

2014-08-06 Thread Baruch Burstein
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I don't know how closely a DropBox folder follows correct (published) filesystem semantics. If DropBox is doing some no-standard things, then it might be possible to corrupt the repository if it lives in a DropBox folder. I

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread Martijn Coppoolse
On 5-8-2014 23:16, Warren Young wrote: On 7/26/2014 08:53, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: * Code review! Fossil already provides all the code review I think any nimble team should need: RSS. 1. Set Fossil up as a server. [1] It's not even necessary to set Fossil up as a server; you can also

[fossil-users] Error compiling current trunk with VC

2014-08-06 Thread Tony Papadimitriou
I get this with trying to compile [78fdf9f5b2] with MSVC. Any ideas? ... zlib.lib ws2_32.lib advapi32.lib zlib.lib(zutil.obj) : warning LNK4217: locally defined symbol _free imported in function _zcfree zlib.lib(zutil.obj) : warning LNK4217: locally defined symbol _malloc imported in function

Re: [fossil-users] Error compiling current trunk with VC

2014-08-06 Thread Tony Papadimitriou
The problem appeared in [5ce85eb6f8] Upgrade the built-in SQLite to the latest 3.8.6 alpha from upstream. (user: mistachkin tags: trunk) -Original Message- From: Tony Papadimitriou Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 12:15 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: [fossil-users]

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: I'm not aware of any evidence that an approve-up-front development process gives better end results than a fix-in-place process. Just to play Devil's Advocate (and not intended to diminish your thoughtful and detailed

Re: [fossil-users] (New To Fossil): Repo Workflow / Should I Clone Or Use Many Opens

2014-08-06 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I don't know how closely a DropBox folder follows correct (published) filesystem semantics. If DropBox is doing some no-standard things, then it

Re: [fossil-users] (New To Fossil): Repo Workflow / Should I Clone Or Use Many Opens

2014-08-06 Thread Baruch Burstein
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com wrote: To the best of my knowledge, Dropbox is not a virtual filesystem. It is a regular folder in the regular filesystem that is managed by the OS. The

Re: [fossil-users] (New To Fossil): Repo Workflow / Should I Clone Or Use Many Opens

2014-08-06 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com wrote: To the best of my knowledge, Dropbox is not a virtual filesystem. It

Re: [fossil-users] (New To Fossil): Repo Workflow / Should I Clone Or Use Many Opens

2014-08-06 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: That's always been my assumption, but _somehow_ it avoids conflicting (if it sees a conflict, it creates two copies and lets the user sort it out, but i haven't seen that happen in about 4 years). My current hypothesis

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: I'm not aware of any evidence that an approve-up-front development process gives better end results than a fix-in-place process. Just to play

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 7/26/2014 08:53, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: * Code review! Your talk of state machines suggests that you're instead envisioning a system where you can't get a checkin into the trunk -- maybe not even into a

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread Warren Young
On 8/6/2014 01:49, Martijn Coppoolse wrote: On 5-8-2014 23:16, Warren Young wrote: 1. Set Fossil up as a server. [1] It's not even necessary to set Fossil up as a server; you can also run `fossil rss` Nice. Thanks for the tip. [2] A quick glance at src/rss.c in the Fossil sources says

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread B Harder
On 8/6/14, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 7/26/2014 08:53, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: * Code review! Your talk of state machines suggests that you're instead envisioning a system where you can't get a checkin into

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ron W on Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:14:13 -0400: When a developer has a change ready for review, she/he sends a review request with the name of the branch (on his repo). the the integrator (or an automated process) would then pull that branch so the reviewers can review if. Do you mean

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Warren Young on Wed, 06 Aug 2014 12:22:45 -0600: Out here in the normal software world, I think we are being presumptuous to use the word engineering. We usually cannot write an equation to prove our software correct. The earth trembles as Dijkstra rolls in his grave:

[fossil-users] how to push to chiselapp

2014-08-06 Thread Will Parsons
I'm trying out chiselapp for the first time and running into difficulties. I managed to create an account for myself and upload an existing repo successfully, but I can't seem to figure out how to push changes to chiselapp. What I thought should work is: fossil push

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread Warren Young
On 8/6/2014 15:27, Andy Bradford wrote: Thus said Warren Young on Wed, 06 Aug 2014 12:22:45 -0600: Out here in the normal software world, I think we are being presumptuous to use the word engineering. We usually cannot write an equation to prove our software correct. The earth

Re: [fossil-users] how to push to chiselapp

2014-08-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Will Parsons on Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:53:53 -: Since I wasn't transmitting any sensitive data anyway, I answered yes, and then got: Error: not authorized to write Is there something wrong with the way I'm trying to authenticate? I see you used -B for HTTP_AUTH. I don't

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said B Harder on Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:41:47 -0700: Do we have fine-grained control over pulling only specifically rooted branches? No, but you can certainly clone the developers clone and inspect his changes before pulling into your clone (or pushing directly to main repository).

Re: [fossil-users] how to push to chiselapp

2014-08-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Will Parsons on Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:53:53 -: fossil push https://chiselapp.com/user/uname/repository/reponame -B 'uname:passwd' By the way, if chiselapp does support HTTP_AUTH, then you might simply need to enable REMOTE_USER support in your respository if that is how you

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

2014-08-06 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: I'll finish with my original premise: except in areas where software development is just a way of doing physics or pure mathematics of one sort or another, you probably are not doing engineering from the start. This is

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-06 Thread Steve Bennett
On 6 Aug 2014, at 2:08 pm, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 8/5/2014 18:50, Sean Woods wrote: I saw that jimsh references glob.tcl, so I removed all my local Tcl/Tk stuff -- I wasn't really using it -- and rebuilt Fossil clean from tip, to force it to use jimsh, and it still