Re: [fossil-users] Fossil internal error: out of memory

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Alexey Pechnikov on Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:16:32 +0300: > > > Hmm, It's only 1Gb total size of my files. I have 8GB RAM on the > > laptop and 16GB RAM on the server. But it's not enough as I see. So I

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil internal error: out of memory

>> From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org >> [mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] >> On Behalf Of Stephan Beal >> i would be interested in hearing from any other users who store >> huge files in their repos, and how much memory fossil eats while doing so. I remember

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil internal error: out of memory

Thus said Alexey Pechnikov on Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:16:32 +0300: > Hmm, It's only 1Gb total size of my files. I have 8GB RAM on the > laptop and 16GB RAM on the server. But it's not enough as I see. So I > sure it's bug. Do you understand the issue now? Have you ruled out the possibility

Re: [fossil-users] Slight file renames

On 11/16/15, Ron W wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:38 PM, bch wrote: > >> In the immediate case, it's me tracking 3rd party vendor code which I >> depend on. I untar, add, commit. On upstream updates, I nuke the >> 3rd-party >> code, lay down the

Re: [fossil-users] Slight file renames

In the immediate case, it's me tracking 3rd party vendor code which I depend on. I untar, add, commit. On upstream updates, I nuke the 3rd-party code, lay down the new release and this is where we might find renaming issues as I described. On Nov 16, 2015 9:24 AM, "Ron W"

Re: [fossil-users] Slight file renames

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:38 PM, bch wrote: > In the immediate case, it's me tracking 3rd party vendor code which I > depend on. I untar, add, commit. On upstream updates, I nuke the 3rd-party > code, lay down the new release and this is where we might find renaming >

Re: [fossil-users] Slight file renames

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:20 PM, bch wrote: > This is roughly what I'm doing, but it's not 100% accurate, and for > the case of 100s of files, still tedious. I guess the point is that > there's not any special secret method available with-in or outside > fossil (outside of

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil repo on a network share?

It is theoretically doable, but ill advised, given that the underlying SQLite database depends on an accurate / dependable file system, and network file systems are notoriously 'fragile' from the point of view of data integrity. On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Dömötör Gulyás

[fossil-users] Fossil repo on a network share?

I've got an environment where it'd be good to put a fossil repo onto a windows network share, as running an actual server is hindered by corporate IT policy. Has anybody done this, or is this at least theoretically doable? Cheers & thanks, DG ___

Re: [fossil-users] Slight file renames

On 11/16/2015 6:00 PM, bch wrote: Further to that: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4908336/can-git-really-track-the-movement-of-a-single-function-from-1-file-to-another-i To be clear, I don't fully understand what the git model is (I repeatedly hear "it doesn't track files", but I haven't

Re: [fossil-users] Slight file renames

On 11/16/15, Ron W wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:20 PM, bch wrote: > >> This is roughly what I'm doing, but it's not 100% accurate, and for >> the case of 100s of files, still tedious. I guess the point is that >> there's not any special secret

Re: [fossil-users] Slight file renames

[apologies if shows this up twice, but I think I messed up the first time] On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:20 PM, bch wrote: > In this sense, the behavour of git (iiuc) would be roughly what I want > where it tracks bytes, not files (this is what I think I undertand; it > allows

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil repo on a network share?

On Nov 16, 2015 23:57, "Dömötör Gulyás" wrote: > > I've got an environment where it'd be good to put a fossil repo onto a windows network share, No, you don't! It is NEVER a good idea to host a multi-user sqlite db on a network share. See the sqlite mailing list archives for

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil internal error: out of memory

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Alexey Pechnikov wrote: > Hi Richard, I checked the files and I see 2 CSV files about 450Mb the > each. I use fossil for some science datasets and so I really need store > large files. > Also I have some SQL dumps at about 10GB size but I

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil internal error: out of memory

Hmm, It's only 1Gb total size of my files. I have 8GB RAM on the laptop and 16GB RAM on the server. But it's not enough as I see. So I sure it's bug. Do you understand the issue now? 2015-11-16 12:07 GMT+03:00 Stephan Beal : > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Alexey

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil internal error: out of memory

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Alexey Pechnikov wrote: > Hmm, It's only 1Gb total size of my files. I have 8GB RAM on the laptop > and 16GB RAM on the server. But it's not enough as I see. So I sure it's > bug. Do you understand the issue now? > i understand the

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil internal error: out of memory

> AFAIK (possibly wrong) nobody has tried using fossil for files that big so far :/. Maybe. We can store 10-20Gb media file in SQLite on smartphone but we can't store human genome in Fossil on laptop/server. It's very strange point... 2015-11-16 13:25 GMT+03:00 Stephan Beal

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil internal error: out of memory

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Alexey Pechnikov wrote: > > AFAIK (possibly wrong) nobody has tried using fossil for files that big > so far :/. > Maybe. We can store 10-20Gb media file in SQLite on smartphone but we > can't store human genome in Fossil on

[fossil-users] Slight file renames

I've got some work where I've got some files whose names change between commits, but are the same logical entity. For example, if I have a file: libxyz-1.2.txt, which might be a description of libxyz (for version 1.2 in particular), if the name changes to libxyz-1.3.txt for the next commit, what