Re: [fossil-users] Stress testing www4... (was Re: [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, John P. Rouillard wrote: > > Well since reverse proxy servers use a client idle setting, would I be > crazy to suggest the same for fossil? > I did a half-baked idle timer in the latest check-in, using the --max-latency option. fossil server

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

The latest trunk check-in on Fossil (http://www4.fossil-scm.org/info/05ec15cad53e8176) should do a much better job of handling load from "fossil server". Please compile and run it and let me know what happens. The www4.fossil-scm.org server is running as follows: /usr/local/bin/fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Stress testing www4... (was Re: [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Hi Richard: In message

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: > > There is now more than 24 subprocesses of Fossil running, and it’s > getting really slow. Are you saying that these 24 Fossils are spinning - using CPU cycles - not just hung waiting on I/O? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org

Re: [fossil-users] Digital signatures on check-ins. Was: tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

On Dec 21, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > I’d recommend designing three distinct black-filled SVG icons Another idea: Unicode may have characters you can use as icons. Lock: http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f512/ Open:

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 19/12/2017 à 21:49, Warren Young a écrit : If it’s a sign of a bug, then it means something very bad has happened, like the network stack has lost track of its client somehow. To see that, you’d need to do a network capture on that fossil instance’s network sockets. Use netstat -nap or

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 7:46 AM, Olivier R. wrote: > > Le 19/12/2017 à 21:49, Warren Young a écrit : > >> If it’s a sign of a bug, then it means something very bad has >> happened, like the network stack has lost track of its client >> somehow. To see that, you’d need to do a

Re: [fossil-users] Digital signatures on check-ins. Was: tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

On Dec 21, 2017, at 4:57 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > On 21 December 2017 at 15:03, Warren Young wrote: >> On Dec 21, 2017, at 2:58 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: >>> perhaps left of the username. >> >> I think right, simply

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 8:10 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > $ sudo tshark -b duration:1 port 8080 and tcp.flags.syn==1 | wc -l Sorry, that’s bogus. Try this instead: $ sudo tshark -i enp3s0 -w x.pcap -b duration:5 -a files:1 \ port 8080 and "tcp[tcpflags] & tcp-syn !=

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 8:24 AM, Olivier R. wrote: > > I’ll have to kill all these processes soon and relaunch Fossil. > I’ll do it when you think you have enough information about this problem. My request for connection rates doesn’t require that you keep Fossil running — in

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: > > I’ll have to kill all these processes soon and relaunch Fossil. > I’ll do it when you think you have enough information about this > problem. I’ll use Fossil 2.4 next time. > Maybe there is some kind of issue in the HTTP server

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: > > I didn’t use Fossil 2.3 because the SQLite version bundled was in beta > stage. That is NOT a good reason to reject the use of Fossil 2.3. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Hello all: In message

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 16:10, Warren Young a écrit : 1. Your repo is public-facing. Is this a reasonable number of clients to be connected at any given time to this repo? It seems high to me, given the transient nature of most Fossil connections. Only two devs have the right to modify the online

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 15:59, Richard Hipp a écrit : On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: There is now more than 24 subprocesses of Fossil running, and it’s getting really slow. Are you saying that these 24 Fossils are spinning - using CPU cycles - not just hung waiting on I/O?

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 8:56 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > (afaik) nobody uses "fossil server" > for long-running websites. I do. Mine stay running for months at a time, including public-facing ones. > use the xinetd/inetd style of invoking Fossil I can only see that helping if

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Olivier R. wrote: > > Le 22/12/2017 à 16:10, Warren Young a écrit : > >> 1. Your repo is public-facing. Is this a reasonable number of >> clients to be connected at any given time to this repo? It seems >> high to me, given the transient

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Tomek Kott wrote: > > FWIW I also run in server mode constantly because its easy. My users (there > are 10, they probably hit the server in bursts of 10 times one one day of the > week) occasionally notice slowdowns and ping me. When I

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

FWIW I also run in server mode constantly because its easy. My users (there are 10, they probably hit the server in bursts of 10 times one one day of the week) occasionally notice slowdowns and ping me. This is for an internal site only, no public facing, so shouldn't be huge numbers of users.

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > I posted a long HOWTO about it back in June of 2016: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg23320.html I just realized that that message is a reply to my post, not the post itself.

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 9:03 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > Olivier, what about memory usage for the Fossil processes? “top” can give > you this. I just checked my public server, and each of the 4 Fossil instances is taking about 20 MB of VM, of which only about 800 kB is

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 21:34, Richard Hipp a écrit : On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: I also run Fossil on a cheap VPS. https://www.scaleway.com/virtual-cloud-servers/ (The starter version at €2.99/month) I'm building up a new Fossil server on this VPS now - on an ARM64-2G

Re: [fossil-users] Digital signatures on check-ins. Was: tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

On Fri 22 Dec 2017 6:13 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 21, 2017, at 4:57 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > > > On 21 December 2017 at 15:03, Warren Young wrote: > >> On Dec 21, 2017, at 2:58 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: > >>>

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil hack: quickly finding the first checkin via the web UI

On Thu 21 Dec 2017 11:46 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > Nice tip. > > Since I've seen DRH ask about available features on GitHub since I started > lurking on this list recently, > I'd mention the graphs the latter provide which I find useful, in the > Insights tab of a project. > The Code

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: > > I also run Fossil on a cheap VPS. Maybe you have used up your bandwidth quota and the ISP is throttling your connection? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 22:39, Richard Hipp a écrit : On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: I also run Fossil on a cheap VPS. Maybe you have used up your bandwidth quota and the ISP is throttling your connection? There is no bandwidth quota. And when I kill the processes and

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 19:57, Warren Young a écrit : On Dec 22, 2017, at 9:03 AM, Warren Young wrote: Olivier, what about memory usage for the Fossil processes? “top” can give you this. I just checked my public server, and each of the 4 Fossil instances is taking about 20 MB

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 18:41, Warren Young a écrit : I’ve added the user to the “wireshark” group, but it doesn’t work. You have to log out and back in before group changes will take effect. That’s what I did. But it didn’t work. So I used `lsof -i:8080` again. Here is the difference with the

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: > > I also run Fossil on a cheap VPS. > https://www.scaleway.com/virtual-cloud-servers/ > (The starter version at €2.99/month) > I'm building up a new Fossil server on this VPS now - on an ARM64-2G machine in Paris. It is slow-going.

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: >> >> I also run Fossil on a cheap VPS. >> https://www.scaleway.com/virtual-cloud-servers/ >> (The starter version at €2.99/month) >> > > I'm building up a new Fossil server on this VPS now

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

In message , Warren Young writes: >On Dec 22, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Olivier R. wrote: >> >> Le 22/12/2017 à 16:10, Warren Young a écrit : >>> 1. Your repo is public-facing. Is this a reasonable number of >>> clients to be

Re: [fossil-users] Stress testing www4... (was Re: [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, John P. Rouillard wrote: > > I am currently running 5 > > nc www4.fossil-scm.org 80 > > processes and sending no input. Ah hah! I think the problem is this code: http://www4.fossil-scm.org/artifact/9694a7dc?ln=1855-1858 That connection rate throttler is code