Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

2012-10-09 Thread Alaric Snell-Pym
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/09/2012 11:19 AM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: Actually... No. Fossil, with it's monolithic single-app design, is relatively hard to both extend and embed. Also, seeing how Natacha's attempts at providing a much-requested feature were

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

2012-10-09 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: Actually... No. Fossil, with it's monolithic single-app design, is relatively hard to both extend and embed. I strongly disagree with this statement. Fossil is very extensible in the classic Unix sense, by building command lines and parsing the resulting

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

2012-10-09 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Oct 9, 2012, at 13:30 , Joe Mistachkin wrote: Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: Actually... No. Fossil, with it's monolithic single-app design, is relatively hard to both extend and embed. I strongly disagree with this statement. Fossil is very extensible in the classic Unix sense,

Re: [fossil-users] Downloading raw artifacts

2012-10-09 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:30:56PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:19:28PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: An artifact does not necessarily have a filename, or it might have multiple filenames. Nevertheless, we can guess at the filename, and from that guess at

Re: [fossil-users] Downloading raw artifacts

2012-10-09 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:30:56PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:19:28PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: An artifact does not necessarily have a filename, or it might have multiple

Re: [fossil-users] Downloading raw artifacts

2012-10-09 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:33:46AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote: I wrote a code change that makes this work for the attachments: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/5f3916ac5b An alternative implementation

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

2012-10-09 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Oct 9, 2012, at 16:36 , Joe Mistachkin wrote: Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: So, is it finally possible to script pre-/post- commit hooks? More or less: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact?ci=trunkfilename=src/xfer.cl n=1201-1205 The key is that these are

[fossil-users] Agile Fossil?

2012-10-09 Thread Dirk Reiners
Hi Everybody, I've just started using Fossil, and I was curious to see what the intended development directions were. Specifically I would be interested to know if there were any plans to add some agile support to it. I'm not really expecting anything fancy, primarily better support for

Re: [fossil-users] Agile Fossil?

2012-10-09 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Oct 9, 2012, at 17:43 , Dirk Reiners wrote: I've just started using Fossil, and I was curious to see what the intended development directions were. Specifically I would be interested to know if there were any plans to add some agile support to it. I'm not really expecting anything fancy,

Re: [fossil-users] SSH url concept question

2012-10-09 Thread Thomas Stover
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:28pm, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org said: No password is required to access the repository on the remote end. Because you are accessing it locally, you have complete administrator/setup rights. It will let you do anything. Permissions do not matter. Ok,

Re: [fossil-users] SSH url concept question

2012-10-09 Thread Thomas Stover
I figured it out. I had to hack the source a little. I'll be back with some sort of coherent response ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] Seg fault when doing 'fossil http'

2012-10-09 Thread David Given
So I tried this: fossil http /home/fossil --baseurl http://cowlark.com/fossil Now, I know now that the version of Fossil I was testing with doesn't support --baseurl, but I surprised to get this in response: Segmentation fault Brief experimentation shows that any unrecognised option after the

[fossil-users] suggested modifications to ssh code

2012-10-09 Thread Thomas Stover
I'm going to have to call it a day, but this is good enough to communicate my points (I hope). The ssh transport does not run fossil as a remote command via the invocation of ssh (as in ssh -l user -p port host 'fossil parameters'). Instead it uses ssh to log into the shell, then from there

Re: [fossil-users] Seg fault when doing 'fossil http'

2012-10-09 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:37 PM, David Given d...@cowlark.com wrote: So I tried this: fossil http /home/fossil --baseurl http://cowlark.com/fossil Now, I know now that the version of Fossil I was testing with doesn't support --baseurl, but I surprised to get this in response: Segmentation