Re: [fossil-users] cannot handle R records, use --full-tree error when importing from bzr

2014-09-11 Thread Dömötör Gulyás
Well, it looks like i have to round trip through git anyhow, as a lot of the repos created by direct bzr fast-export | fossil import come up empty past the initial commit. Curious and curiouser. On 10 September 2014 17:47, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:38 AM,

Re: [fossil-users] Going insane with symlinks

2014-09-11 Thread David Mason
On 11 September 2014 01:06, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1413003970.hefagogaedafkffga...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said David Mason on Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:42:09 -0400: : Daves-MacBook-Retina-784 ; cat .fossil-settings/allow-symlinks yes : Daves-MacBook-Retina-784 ; fs ci -m test New_Version:

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

2014-09-11 Thread John Long
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:05:33PM -0600, Scott Robison wrote: On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: git branch -D name Eh, filesystems let you delete files. Unlike most filesystems, git lets you restore your deleted branches (yes, provided you

Re: [fossil-users] How to do branching with new major versions

2014-09-11 Thread Nico Williams
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Sometimes we will make a check-in to trunk then later decide it doesn't belong

Re: [fossil-users] How to do branching with new major versions

2014-09-11 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org On the few cases when this has happened to me, I've moved goof into a new branch (typically mistake) then cherry pick the follow-on check-ins back

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

2014-09-11 Thread Nico Williams
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:18 AM, John Long codeb...@inbox.lv wrote: On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:05:33PM -0600, Scott Robison wrote: On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: git branch -D name Eh, filesystems let you delete files. Unlike most

Re: [fossil-users] How to do branching with new major versions

2014-09-11 Thread Nico Williams
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org On the few cases when this has happened to me, I've moved goof into a new

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

2014-09-11 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: Nothing can really be made immutable, but you can detect mutation. No. Version 9491ba7d738528f168657adb43a198238abde19e (the SQLite 3.8.6 release) cannot be modified in any way without changing its hash value, thus

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

2014-09-11 Thread Nico Williams
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: Nothing can really be made immutable, but you can detect mutation. No. Version 9491ba7d738528f168657adb43a198238abde19e (the SQLite 3.8.6

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

2014-09-11 Thread Nico Williams
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: No, he can't. Well, he can, but he will break the hashes of other records, so any tamping will be noticed. Specifically, the Z- and R-cards detect any sort of tampering. Right. He can. If you've not pushed the

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

2014-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: No, he can't. Well, he can, but he will break the hashes of other records, so any tamping will be noticed. Specifically, the Z- and

Re: [fossil-users] fossil - JIRA hooks

2014-09-11 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: Is it not possible to define an open-ended list of name-value pairs? Sure we can, but then we've got a data format nobody can predict, which doesn't

Re: [fossil-users] fossil - JIRA hooks

2014-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: As best I can determine, Fossil already demands that whomever adds custom fields take responsibility for the customized New Ticket, View Tick and Edit Ticket pages and associated TH1 apply the semantics correctly and

Re: [fossil-users] Going insane with symlinks

2014-09-11 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said David Mason on Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:14:02 -0400: committing .fossil-settings/allow-symlinks first doesn't. This looks like a bug to me... what is the point of version-able allow-symlinks? Actually, it does work. The problem isn't with the versionable setting. There is a bug, but

Re: [fossil-users] How to do branching with new major versions

2014-09-11 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

2014-09-11 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: (Unless you can mount a pre-image attack against SHA1 - let's assume that is impossible.) FYI, FWIW, SHA1 seems to be deprecated. There was a summary on slashdot.org about Google planning to change Chrome's default setting

[fossil-users] Fwd: fossil server --basename ... apparent bug

2014-09-11 Thread Colin McCormack
Hi, I would expect, having started a server with basename (say) http://localhost/fossil to be able to proxy URLs of the form 'GET /fossil/logo ...' and have fossil strip the /fossil prefix (ie: basename) from the URL, and respond with the logo. I understand that --basename modifies the links

[fossil-users] Getting configure to find openssl on FreeBSD

2014-09-11 Thread org.fossil-scm.fossil-users
'Lo. The fossil build scripts seem to be unable to find openssl on FreeBSD 9.2. It has a choice of the version included with the base system (in /usr) or the version available from FreeBSD ports (/usr/local), but it can't seem to find either of them. Is there any way to get it to give more

Re: [fossil-users] Fwd: fossil server --basename ... apparent bug

2014-09-11 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Colin McCormack mcc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would expect, having started a server with basename (say) http://localhost/fossil to be able to proxy URLs of the form 'GET /fossil/logo ...' and have fossil strip the /fossil prefix (ie: basename) from the URL,

Re: [fossil-users] fossil - JIRA hooks

2014-09-11 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: As best I can determine, Fossil already demands that whomever adds custom fields take responsibility for the customized New Ticket, View Tick and Edit

Re: [fossil-users] Getting configure to find openssl on FreeBSD

2014-09-11 Thread Eric Rubin-Smith
org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com wrote: 'Lo. The fossil build scripts seem to be unable to find openssl on FreeBSD 9.2. It has a choice of the version included with the base system (in /usr) or the version available from FreeBSD ports (/usr/local), but it can't seem to find either of

[fossil-users] Manually deleting users

2014-09-11 Thread Philip Bennefall
I know that this goes against the philosophy of Fossil, and I realize that I am entering dirty hack territory. Nevertheless, I am wondering how I can remove a user that has made no commits, no ticket updates/additions, and no wiki updates/additions whatsoever. Is it enough to say: delete

Re: [fossil-users] Getting configure to find openssl on FreeBSD

2014-09-11 Thread org.fossil-scm.fossil-users
On 2014-09-11T16:09:42 -0400 Eric Rubin-Smith eas@gmail.com wrote: I skimmed through the configure code. Looks like you need to have the subdir and file 'openssl/ssl.h' beneath the dir you specify, and the subdir and files 'lib/libssl.so' and 'lib/libcrypto.so' beneath the dir you

Re: [fossil-users] Manually deleting users

2014-09-11 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Philip Bennefall phi...@blastbay.com wrote: I know that this goes against the philosophy of Fossil, and I realize that I am entering dirty hack territory. Nevertheless, I am wondering how I can remove a user that has made no commits, no ticket

Re: [fossil-users] Going insane with symlinks

2014-09-11 Thread David Mason
On 11 September 2014 13:50, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1413049836.aenikllhaaeaihnhp...@bradfords.org wrote: Actually, it does work. The problem isn't with the versionable setting. There is a bug, but its in fossil open, not the setting. After you open the fossil, delete the link (which is

Re: [fossil-users] Fwd: fossil server --basename ... apparent bug

2014-09-11 Thread Colin McCormack
(sorry for the funky formatting, Mailman) I wrote: I would expect, having started a server with basename (say) http://localhost/fossil to be able to proxy URLs of the form 'GET /fossil/logo ...' and have fossil strip the /fossil prefix (ie: basename) from the URL, and respond with the logo.

Re: [fossil-users] Fwd: fossil server --basename ... apparent bug

2014-09-11 Thread Colin McCormack
I see this is essentially a duplicate of this bug: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg11051.html which was reported about 18 months ago, with a patch. On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Colin McCormack mcc...@gmail.com wrote: (sorry for the funky formatting,

Re: [fossil-users] Getting configure to find openssl on FreeBSD

2014-09-11 Thread Steve Bennett
On 12 Sep 2014, at 5:06 am, org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com wrote: 'Lo. The fossil build scripts seem to be unable to find openssl on FreeBSD 9.2. It has a choice of the version included with the base system (in /usr) or the version available from FreeBSD ports (/usr/local), but it