Re: [fossil-users] proposed patch: symlinks appear as regular files even when allow-symlinks is on

2014-10-31 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: + char zValue[4] = {0,0,0,0}; + int i; + snprintf(zValue, sizeof(zValue), %s, blob_str(content)); Minor nitpick: snprintf() is not c89. i would recommend using another blob for zValue, and

[fossil-users] Larger diff possible?

2014-10-31 Thread Jungle Boogie
Hello All, Take a look at this change: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/vinfo/de17e35bf12a8585f5c151c8b4ab3f8d36b6f0c8?sbs=1 We have the left and right view of the change. Is there a way to maximize this view to have a side-by-side view of the diffs? I see that you can undiff to make it color

Re: [fossil-users] Larger diff possible?

2014-10-31 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, Take a look at this change: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/vinfo/de17e35bf12a8585f5c151c8b4ab3f 8d36b6f0c8?sbs=1 We have the left and right view of the change. Is there a way to maximize this view

Re: [fossil-users] Larger diff possible?

2014-10-31 Thread Jungle Boogie
Dear Richard, From: Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org Sent: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:19:04 -0400 To: Fossil SCM user's discussion fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Larger diff possible? On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Jungle

Re: [fossil-users] Larger diff possible?

2014-10-31 Thread Eric Rubin-Smith
Jungle Boogie wrote: It absolutely is a side-by-side. I'm asking if its possible to maximize or display the diffs in a larger format with larger font. Try holding down the Control key and then hitting the Equals key = on your keyboard a few times. In most browers these days, that zooms in

Re: [fossil-users] Larger diff possible?

2014-10-31 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith eas@gmail.com wrote: Try holding down the Control key and then hitting the Equals key = on your keyboard a few times. In most browers these days, that zooms in the whole page while trying to keep things in relative proportion.

Re: [fossil-users] proposed patch: symlinks appear as regular files even when allow-symlinks is on

2014-10-31 Thread Matt Welland
Since you all are looking at symlinks someone reported to me that there are problems when a symlink is replaced with a directory or vice versa. Here is the script that he generated to illustrate the issue: ## Create repo and initial population fossil init bare.repo mkdir link_target_dir touch

Re: [fossil-users] Larger diff possible?

2014-10-31 Thread Jungle Boogie
Dear Stephan, From: Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com Sent: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:03:55 +0100 To: Fossil SCM user's discussion fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Larger diff possible? On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Eric

Re: [fossil-users] Larger diff possible?

2014-10-31 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jungle Boogie on Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:17:33 -0700: So the answer is: the side-by-side diff view is the largest and only image available. You can zoom in on the image via web browser but this will maximize everything--not just the diff. I think you can change the font size of the

[fossil-users] Fossil Emacs

2014-10-31 Thread Andreas Kupries
Is http://chiselapp.com/user/venks/repository/emacs-fossil/doc/tip/doc/index.wiki known ? If not, consider this as an FYI ;) -- Andreas Kupries Senior Tcl Developer Code to Cloud: Smarter, Safer, Fasterâ„¢ F: 778.786.1133 andre...@activestate.com, http://www.activestate.com Learn about Stackato

Re: [fossil-users] Larger diff possible?

2014-10-31 Thread Jungle Boogie
Dear Andy, Fossil-users, From: Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1417366026.oiljbdnhldcckggde...@bradfords.org Sent: 31 Oct 2014 10:47:05 -0600 To: Jungle Boogie Cc: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Larger diff possible? Thus

Re: [fossil-users] fossil export to git unsupported command: blob

2014-10-31 Thread E. Timothy Uy
It has been almost 2 years, and I'm still having the same issue. fossil export --git ..\cerod.fossil | git fast-import fatal: Unsupported command: blob fast-import: dumping crash report to .git/fast_import_crash_4416 If anyone has any thoughts, they would be much appreciated. On Tue, Jan 29,

Re: [fossil-users] fossil export to git unsupported command: blob

2014-10-31 Thread E. Timothy Uy
Perhaps this sheds a clue? http://repo.or.cz/w/sqlite-export.git/blob/master:/README.txt On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:33 PM, E. Timothy Uy t...@loqu8.com wrote: It has been almost 2 years, and I'm still having the same issue. fossil export --git ..\cerod.fossil | git fast-import fatal:

Re: [fossil-users] fossil export to git unsupported command: blob

2014-10-31 Thread E. Timothy Uy
Looks like there is a ticket to this and it related to CRLF on Windows - http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=feeb8a91eb - will try Mac. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:46 PM, E. Timothy Uy t...@loqu8.com wrote: Perhaps this sheds a clue?

[fossil-users] fossil export to git fatal: mark :60713 not declared

2014-10-31 Thread E. Timothy Uy
I was able to import see.fossil and cerod.fossil from Cygwin with no issues. However for SQLite, $ fossil export --git ../../../sqlite.fossil | git fast-import fatal: mark :60713 not declared fast-import: dumping crash report to ./.git/modules/src/sqlite/fast_import_crash_1168 From the

Re: [fossil-users] proposed patch: symlinks appear as regular files even when allow-symlinks is on

2014-10-31 Thread Eric Rubin-Smith
Richard Hipp wrote: sqlite3_snprintf() is guaranteed to be available. Note, though, that the first two parameters are reversed. :-\ Well, I only really want to copy up to 3 bytes, so we can keep it simple, stupid and just not make a function call. The revised patch is below. But in

Re: [fossil-users] proposed patch: symlinks appear as regular files even when allow-symlinks is on

2014-10-31 Thread Eric Rubin-Smith
Another iteration. We need to add an extra byte in case the true value is the string true. I've re-expressed the loop as a 'for' loop while I was at it. Sorry for the spam. Again, please treat the below with caution until I have (or someone else has) a chance to exercise it better. Index: