On 10 March 2015 at 09:55, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that I'm even remotely interested in project, but I thought I'd
share it because it's so similar to Fossil:
http://veracity-scm.com/
BTW, referring link was this:
The new search functionality is awesome and quick - thanks, drh. It is a huge
step forward to make Fossil usable for non-programmers, i.e. GUI-only users
(managers, testers, documentation writers).
It's not quite there yet, IMHO. drh - and other valued contributors - what do
you think about
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:47 AM, Steven Harford ste...@puddletheory.com
wrote:
I prefer (2). It's more concise and looks great in each of the examples
you provided. Therefore, I'm not sure it's worth maintaining both display
styles in the source code.
Also agree
On 3/10/2015 3:47 AM, Steven Harford wrote:
I prefer (2). It's more concise and looks great in each of the examples
you provided. Therefore, I'm not sure it's worth maintaining both
display styles in the source code.
Agree.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:37 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10 March 2015 at 12:15, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems to me that he doesn't realize that Fossil separates the repository
from the working copy. He's expecting fossil clone to work like Git
or
Hg
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:52:16 -0400:
Oh, it does. Try a graph with n=all and you'll see. When you start
to get a lot of rails, and the graph gets all scrunched together, then
(2) is clearly better. The question is should we go with (2) always,
or use (1) for graphs
Hi Ron,
On 10 March 2015 at 12:15, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:58 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com
wrote:
BTW, referring link was this:
http://www.omiyagames.com/farewell-fossil-version-control/
Author's main complaints about Fossil were:
...
Hello!
Sorry the font was to small for you (I contributed the skin), that change
looks good.
Do you mind sharing which browser and OS you are using? I would like to
try to reproduce the issue.
As far as fonts go, all font sizes should be relative (using the rem
value suffix) to the font size
Hi Andrew,
On 10 March 2015 at 11:33, Andrew Moore zak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
Sorry the font was to small for you (I contributed the skin), that change
looks good.
Thanks for the contributions!
Do you mind sharing which browser and OS you are using? I would like to try
to reproduce
Wow -- is that ever subtle... now that I see it, I think I like nomo=1
-bch
On 3/10/15, Martin S. Weber ephae...@gmx.net wrote:
On 2015-03-09 21:42:51, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:06:59 -0400:
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
(1)
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:58 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com
wrote:
BTW, referring link was this:
http://www.omiyagames.com/farewell-fossil-version-control/
Author's main complaints about Fossil were:
...
-Author thought you had to run sql each time to list tickets.
Many issue
Although both are good, my vote is for nomo=0 (choice 1) as being the one
that 'goes to 11' :)
-Original Message-
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:06:59PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
(1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=0
(2)
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de
wrote:
Unless large files means larger than 2GB, I don't believe there is
one. I haven't run into a case where I wanted to use version control
systems for handling such files yet...
I posted a comment and he replied
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:37 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10 March 2015 at 12:15, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Many issue tracking systems have a GUI, point and click query
builder/editor. So, SQL use can be mostly avoided.
Creating such a query builder
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 04:52:05PM -0400, Ron W wrote:
I suspect the main reason was the problem with large files, whatever his
threshold for large is. Not a limit I've run into, yet.
Unless large files means larger than 2GB, I don't believe there is
one. I haven't run into a case where I
I prefer (2). It's more concise and looks great in each of the examples
you provided. Therefore, I'm not sure it's worth maintaining both
display styles in the source code.
Warm regards,
Steven
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:06:59PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
2015-03-09 23:06 GMT+01:00 Tontyna tont...@ultrareal.de:
Hurray and thank you!
Will `addremove` become `addforget`? (Sorry, couldn't resist nitpicking.)
It should be 'addforgetrename', with the added functionality that
renames are detected too ;-)
Regards,
Jan Nijtmans
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 06:14:10PM -0400, Ron W wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de
wrote:
Unless large files means larger than 2GB, I don't believe there is
one. I haven't run into a case where I wanted to use version control
systems for
18 matches
Mail list logo
