Re: [fossil-users] typos

2016-04-02 Thread Svyatoslav Mishyn
(Fri, 01 Apr 17:50) Ross Berteig: > Even better, Joe has already done that to trunk. But why that commit [b6b50b12] is marked as *FORK* in timeline.rss; and as *BRANCH* in `fossil timeline`; while here https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/b6b50b1244796110 looks like usual commit.. --

Re: [fossil-users] typos

2016-04-02 Thread Ross Berteig
On 4/1/2016 7:14 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Apr 1, 2016, at 7:13 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Apr 1, 2016, at 6:50 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: may I recommend just reading /test-all-help cover to cover once in a while? Okay. Back in a few… A few hours,

Re: [fossil-users] typos

2016-04-02 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On Apr 1, 2016, at 6:50 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: > > To make my spell check easier, I added a new fossil test-all-help > command, which dumps all the help text to stdout. It is otherwise > essentially

Re: [fossil-users] typos

2016-04-02 Thread Ross Berteig
On 4/1/2016 6:13 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Apr 1, 2016, at 6:50 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: ... * "mtime" or "modification time”? That one’s different, with a much stronger claim: man 2 stat. That is, it is a ~45-year old term of art, not a neologism. Well, yes. That one