Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:01:02 -0700 (PDT) Clark Christensen cdcmi...@yahoo.com wrote: Scripting language: I understand the Tcl roots, and I hope you would consider Javascript as a target. JS

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

at 4:30 AM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote: ...Some random thoughts on Fossil v2 as a library (call it libfossil2) and as a default client / server binary which makes use of the library (call it fossil2client or fossil2scm, I seem to have used both names), which I realize you might

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

[Effing GMail sent this before it was fully responded to. My fault for writing my response using the GMail web interface instead of composing it in a text editor like a Real Programmer would have done.] On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote: My apologies

Re: [fossil-users] Q: What Unix / Linux _DISTRIBUTIONS_ Does The Fossil Project Care About?

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:05 AM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: I'd suggest: fossil is happy to run wherever it can, and strives for portability wherever it can, whenever it makes sense. Any OS is welcome to modify/redistribute fossil in the terms described in the license. Well,

Re: [fossil-users] fossil running out of memory

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Benedikt Ahrens benedikt.ahr...@gmx.netwrote: Hello, I am having trouble with a fossil repository containing many binary files. The fossil version is the one packaged in Debian Wheezy:

Re: [fossil-users] Anecdote regarding permissions tracking in Fossil

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym ala...@snell-pym.org.ukwrote: I've written a backup/archival tool based on content-addressible storage, and a common question people ask is So why don't I just put my home directory/entire filesystem in git, then?, and I have to raise this

Re: [fossil-users] New Tree-View feature requires newer sqlite.

[Top-posting considered harmful. *cough*] On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:40 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: On 1/2/14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: The silly requirement of some distributions that *everything* must be a shared library irks me beyond words. I hate having to

Re: [fossil-users] New Tree-View feature requires newer sqlite.

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote: [Top-posting considered harmful. *cough*] On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:40 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: On 1/2/14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: The silly requirement of some distributions

Re: [fossil-users] Export artifact to archive?

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Roy Marples r...@marples.name wrote: On 03/01/2014 16:41, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:36:26PM +, Roy Marples wrote: Can fossil create an archive (tarball, zip file, etc) from a given artifact id WITHOUT using the web

Re: [fossil-users] New Tree-View feature requires newer sqlite.

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote: Further, in the embedded software world at least, I expect it is often difficult or even impossible to update software in the first place

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with compilation under MINGW

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: OK, so I propose the following fix: [...] (2) Remove the --disable-internal-sqlite option on trunk. Require the use of the built-in SQLite only, since SQLite needs to be built with non-standard compile-time options to

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with compilation under MINGW

On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: OK, so I propose the following fix: [...] (2) Remove the --disable

Re: [fossil-users] New Tree-View feature requires newer sqlite.

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: More generally, trying to ensure that a) there's only one copy of every library in the distro/OS, b) all version dependencies match up, is *super* hard, if not impossible. Eventually there are some very commonly used

Re: [fossil-users] New Tree-View feature requires newer sqlite.

On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2014/1/4 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: (3) After SQLite 3.8.3 is released, release fossil 1.28 with the EXACT SQLite 3.8.3 amalgamation included. I assume you do not mean here that Fossil v 1.28 should be

Re: [fossil-users] New Tree-View feature requires newer sqlite.

On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2014/1/7 Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.com: May I ask why that run-time check cannot or should not be made in the release version of Fossil 1.28, rather than immediately after it is tagged

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with compilation under MINGW

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.comwrote: 2014/1/4 James Turner ja...@calminferno.net: I won't begin to tell you how to develop fossil but I do want to throw out there that OpenBSD has been providing fossil with --disable-internal-sqlite via it's ports

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

On Nov 28, 2017 11:08 AM, "Mike Burns" wrote: As much as I agree, software in general has moved on. You won't get > Fossil/SQLite running on a Commodore 64 without a lot of work. > With legacy platforms come legacy software that is either no longer > supported by the

Re: [fossil-users] Show time...

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018, 9:33 PM Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/3/18, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > So, if anybody sees any last minute tidying up that we need to do... > > For example, on the front page > (https://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki), what if > I add some text to item 8

Re: [fossil-users] Extending Fossil with Lua?

[Response intentionally CC'd to the original poster, on the off chance he's not already subscribed to the mailing list] On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas < off...@riseup.net> wrote: This is just kind of a next semester project, but I would like to start > exploring