Re: [fossil-users] some questions about fossil-as-document-repo

2013-01-17 Thread j. van den hoff
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:53:43 +0100, C. Thomas Stover c...@thomasstover.com wrote: On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:55:09 -0600 Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote: C. Thomas Stover c...@thomasstover.com writes: Well if hardcopy means scanned paper (no ocr) then it sounds like a very large

Re: [fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread j. van den hoff
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:28:24 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:48 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote: is this a bug or a feature? I do hope the former since it's really bad behaviour when driving `fossil' with a script. It's

[fossil-users] problem with selecting timeline entries for diffing in the GUI

2013-01-11 Thread j. van den hoff
my question regards the (very useful!) functionality of selecting (clicking) two timeline entries in the web GUI to the repo for diffing. this works alright for me with a certain (remote) repository. it does +not+ work for the local copy of that repo or any other local repo (under URL

[fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread j. van den hoff
hi, I would find it useful if `fossil info' (or `stat', `timeline', or a new command) would provide a means/option to show the total number of revisions (by default or optional), more precisely, the number of file commits (as it is called in `fossil help timeline) in the repo. the

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread j. van den hoff
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:35:06 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:56 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: I would find it useful if `fossil info' (or `stat', `timeline', or a new command) would provide a means/option to show

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread j. van den hoff
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:51:51 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: i'll sign up for adding that - i would be able to do this on Sunday. i would add it to the status command because we have that info in

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread j. van den hoff
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:51:51 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: i'll sign up for adding that - i would be able to do this on Sunday. i would add it to the status command because we have that info in

[fossil-users] spurious CRLF generated by `finfo -p' (and other terminal output)

2012-12-20 Thread j. van den hoff
hi, I accidentally noted that all terminal (stdout) output of `fossil' seemingly uses CRLF (\r\n) as EOL even on unix-based machines (i.e. everything in the world except those view machines running something else ;-)). at least it does so under MacOSX. I would find it more reasonable if

[fossil-users] PLOS (II)

2012-12-20 Thread j. van den hoff
hoping that this does not generate so much turbelence as the mv/rm issue did: I've stumbled over this behavior: -- there is a user account on a remote repo created for me (with commit access) -- I do the clone a la `fossil clone http://myname@URL myrepo.fsl and I'm asked correctly for the

Re: [fossil-users] spurious CRLF generated by `finfo -p' (and other terminal output)

2012-12-20 Thread j. van den hoff
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:03:07 +0100, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:47 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: hi, I accidentally noted that all terminal (stdout) output of `fossil' seemingly uses CRLF (\r\n) as EOL even on unix-based machines

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

2012-12-13 Thread j. van den hoff
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:09:46 +0100, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/13/12 05:07, Carson Chittom wrote: Nolan Darilek no...@thewordnerd.info writes: If we're talking about adding git to the name because of this whole rm thing, we might as well consider mercurial as a

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

2012-12-13 Thread j. van den hoff
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:02:25 +0100, Marcelo richiead...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/12/13 Nolan Darilek no...@thewordnerd.info On 12/13/2012 08:40 AM, Marcelo wrote: They want the good things about fossil but they want to keep working as if it were Git. I say, if they like Git so much, eat the

Re: [fossil-users] suggestion

2012-11-20 Thread j. van den hoff
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:53:04 +0100, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:12 PM, j. v. d. hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:49:22 +0100, Richard

Re: [fossil-users] suggestion

2012-11-20 Thread j. van den hoff
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:13:51 +0100, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:12 PM, j. v. d. hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote: some more remarks from a new user: I've been trying out fossil only for the last two weeks or so. and coming from `mercurial' (and

[fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

2012-11-20 Thread j. van den hoff
I already stumbled a couple of times over the fact that `fossil rm' and `fossil mv' only act on the repository but not on the check out, i.e. I always have to issue two commands in order to actually remove a file from the (future of) the project. obviously this is different from other VCSs

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

2012-11-20 Thread j. van den hoff
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:00:29 +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote: On Nov 20, 2012, at 14:45 , Richard Hipp wrote: CVS did not couple the actions, and I copied CVS in this regard. I agree with you now, that coupling them is the right thing to do. But I fear to

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

2012-11-20 Thread j. van den hoff
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:48:00 +0100, James Turner ja...@calminferno.net wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:39:06PM +, David Given wrote: Richard Hipp wrote: [...] CVS did not couple the actions, and I copied CVS in this regard. I agree with you now, that coupling them is the right thing

Re: [fossil-users] [1.22] Easy way to cancel tentative changes?

2012-11-16 Thread j. van den hoff
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:12:23 +0100, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: Hello This is a newbie question. Prior to using Fossil, to try something and still be able to go back in case the change didn't work, the only way I had was to comment things out. Now that I'm used to using Fossil, I

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.24 not working via ssh

2012-11-12 Thread j. van den hoff
: On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:35:25 +0100, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:56 AM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com**wrote: On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:39:27 +0100, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: sshfs is cool but in a corporate environment it can't

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.24 not working via ssh

2012-11-12 Thread j. van den hoff
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:04 +0100, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:36 AM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote: I've tested this here (with Fossil-4473a27f3b6e049e) but can only report partial success: * it works using bash/ksh as login shell

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.24 not working via ssh

2012-11-11 Thread j. van den hoff
that I was having with fossil+ssh, or at least only did so partially. Why not? In what sshfs failed to give you the equivalent functionality than a remote access to a fossil database through ssh? 2012/11/11 Timothy Beyer bey...@fastmail.net At Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:31:57 +0100, j. van den hoff

[fossil-users] fossil 1.24 not working via ssh

2012-11-10 Thread j. van den hoff
hi list, first time around: I've recently had a first look at fossil. it's mostly working as advertised but communication via ssh won't work. from going through the archives I get the impression that this is a rather long standing problem (~ years...) related to interfering output from the

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.24 not working via ssh

2012-11-10 Thread j. van den hoff
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:48:11 +0100, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote: whoa! that's a quick reply ;-). I would really appreciate if the ssh issue could get addressed by the developers. It has my attention

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.24 not working via ssh

2012-11-10 Thread j. van den hoff
thanks for responding. On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:53:40 +0100, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: I would really appreciate if the ssh

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.24 not working via ssh

2012-11-10 Thread j. van den hoff
at 2:18 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: I would

<    1   2   3   4