Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...

2011-03-03 Thread sky5walk
Hi, New user thoughts... I think the Fossil website as a Wiki existence should be more clearly explained. I too was fooled by this. An inherent feature, is portrayed initially as a bare bones, minimalist website. 1st impressions != lasting impression ;) The name is fine. If this was called

[fossil-users] fossil add somefile.rs = Error

2011-03-28 Thread sky5walk
Hi, I get the following error attempting to add a file with the Ampersand() in the file extension. Fossil wrote: 's' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. Please advise, Steve ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] fossil add somefile.rs = Error

2011-03-28 Thread sky5walk
DOH! fossil add somefile.rs does the trick. This shows how little I am in shell land. :(( Thanks, Steve On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:33 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I get the following error attempting to add a

[fossil-users] Error: not authorized to read / write

2011-03-29 Thread sky5walk
Hi, Another new user dumb question... I created a local and cloned repository with 2 users/passwords that have all privileges checked. autosync is OFF --- Command --- fossil pull t:\myrepo.fossil --- Returns --- Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent: 130

Re: [fossil-users] Error: not authorized to read / write

2011-03-29 Thread sky5walk
Got it... When I uncheck Admin - Access ... [ ] Require password for local access ...I am now able to push and pull. Thanks, Steve On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:42 AM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Another new user dumb question... I created a local and cloned repository with 2

Re: [fossil-users] Commit question

2011-04-04 Thread sky5walk
Thanks! That was a pain. On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Tony Perovic tpero...@compumation.comwrote: Just curious: why is cr/lf in text files undesirable? Tony Perovic Compumation, Inc. -- *From:* fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org [mailto:

[fossil-users] Fossil cannot add filenames with \*[]?

2011-04-04 Thread sky5walk
Hi, This weekend I was shouting praises of Fossil to a friend in the release business and he summarily shot me down with a simple attempt to add his Subversion based repository. Fossil failed on filenames containing brackets - []. Huh? Browsing the mail shows this to be a known issue. Browsing

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil cannot add filenames with \*[]?

2011-04-04 Thread sky5walk
Hi, I looked at the offending files and the brackets as you may have guessed contained incremental numerals. something[1].bin, something[2].bin, etc. Given the filenames are accepted by the O/S, wouldn't it be more prudent to optionally allow these and other wildcards? I'm no fan of branching

Re: [fossil-users] crnl-setting bug

2011-04-07 Thread sky5walk
I prefer an automated approach. (assuming the batch file is simpler than sending data to the ui) The fossil settings work for me on XPsp3. C:\fossilcmd Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\fossilfossil setting crnl-glob * C:\fossil -Steve On Thu,

Re: [fossil-users] crnl-setting bug

2011-04-07 Thread sky5walk
Whoa! How do you... c:\tempdel *.* Some Dot.Net framework class is required? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] CRLF conversion on windows

2011-04-07 Thread sky5walk
Good to know! This came about from supporting data files supplied by various users and I still receive the occasional [CR] only data file? On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:04:44 -0400 sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: I

Re: [fossil-users] crnl-setting bug

2011-04-07 Thread sky5walk
Confirmed. Single quotes work on Win7. On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Scott Robison sc...@scottrobison.us wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Scott Robison sc...@scottrobison.us wrote: I believe the glob-style wildcard

Re: [fossil-users] crnl-setting bug

2011-04-07 Thread sky5walk
LOL...I didn't check the resultant settings. Bummer, so we gotta use the ui for windows 7 and beyond? On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Wilson, Ronald rwils...@harris.com wrote: Confirmed. Single quotes work on Win7. Actually, single quotes don't work either because the single quotes get

Re: [fossil-users] fossil update FAIL

2011-09-14 Thread sky5walk
Ok, Didn't realize there was a disconnected Leaf in the remote repo. c:\myrepo fossil merge 88d803c051 worked. We still are unsure what created the disconnect? Though we seem to have hiccups when upgrading the fossil.exe and doing rebuilds on both local and remote repos. On Tue, Aug 30, 2011

Re: [fossil-users] Behavior of rm, mv, and changes/extra

2011-12-21 Thread sky5walk
+1 for fossil doing my file handling ;) +1 for an option to retain old CVS behavior. On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Ramon Ribó ram...@compassis.com wrote: In my opinion, this option should be changed without fear. If fossil is ready to delete the files when doing an update, why not delete

Re: [fossil-users] C API

2012-01-07 Thread sky5walk
I would love an API or fossil.dll. It's been mentioned many times that fossil.exe outputs are not standardized and require text parsing to differentiate the results. On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:52:51PM +0100, Stephan Beal

Re: [fossil-users] C API

2012-01-07 Thread sky5walk
Yes, I have been reading about the JSON work, but I prefer not to go that route. Personally, I want to automate only the steps I use for my projects. Check in/Check out, Merge, Compare, Commit, Inspect Leaves, etc. I have no desire to make a grandiose do everything GUI and I tire of

Re: [fossil-users] C API

2012-01-07 Thread sky5walk
Maybe I am being overly simplistic, but I think of fossil as a SQLite database that has stored procedures. Wouldn't it be easier to extend fossil's command set to SQLite's? I'm sure the fossil ui feature would be a winner in SQLite ;) On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Stephan Beal

Re: [fossil-users] C API

2012-01-07 Thread sky5walk
Ha, I barely have enough time with my own code. :( Yes, no Stored Procedures, but that's still how I think of fossil and SQLite together without diving under the hood. ;) I should have said SQLite db with lots of C procedures. Thanks for the edification. On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Stephan

Re: [fossil-users] Idea: Close coupled usage model for fossil

2012-04-30 Thread sky5walk
Hi, How can I unset the default user? I cannot see an option under fossil unset ...? Users that forget to: fossil commit -U myusername_notdefault have their changes assigned to the default and wrong user. On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 30,

Re: [fossil-users] Idea: Close coupled usage model for fossil

2012-04-30 Thread sky5walk
Before trying your sql, I opened my repo with SQLiteExpert and found no entry in table config:name = 'default-user'? Is there a hidden location or is the default-user actually NOT set? Really confused since I want #3 below to happen BEFORE #2 :( User Name is determined from the following rules,

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
Hello, Sorry to say, I have come up against this same scenario. After shunning and rebuilding, my repo still contains some 180MB of mistaken files. :( They do not appear in the Timeline or Files listing, but the repo contains them nonetheless. What is the safest and most efficient way to return my

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
Yes, and it did take more than a minute or so. But the before and after sizing of the repo remained nearly the same. On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Jonas Malaco Filho jonasmalacofi...@gmail.com wrote: Have you rebuild the repository? fossil rebuild Jonas Malaco Filho Sent from my iPhone

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
The offending files were added only in 4 sequential artifacts or commits. I shunned those 4 and performed a rebuild and the visible record is wiped, but the size is still wrong. On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tomek Kott tkott.li...@outlook.com wrote: On 30/08/2012, at 13:44,

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
If I view the fossil repo in a SQLite browser, there are several very large blobs, but I cannot safely remove these without knowledge? On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:16 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: The offending files were added only in 4 sequential artifacts or commits. I shunned those 4 and

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
No luck using c:\ fossil clone myrepo.fossil myrepo2.fossil Sizes are the same. My question is should I shun even more or just go back to an earlier repo before the addfiles error? I'm not getting a warm fuzzy about fossil shunning inadvertent files :( On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Nolan

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
Well, VACUUM removed 500kB. Still 179MB to go... On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Jonas Malaco Filho jonasmalacofi...@gmail.com wrote: Not sure if it makes sense (since I know exactly how clone works), but could there be unused pages in the sqlite layer? sqlite VACUUM; Jonas Malaco Filho

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
Ok, really frustrating, since I now shunning all artifacts from this week. Then rebuild. Still ~180MB of data somewhere in the repo! :( I had not previously trouble shot this error condition but only read about it in the mail archives. A seemingly simple add files CANNOT be undone by me. Unless

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
Ok Baruch, I will try your sql if you have a suggestion. Is this really a bug? On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Tomek Kott tkott.li...@outlook.com wrote: *Thanks Baruch, I will try anything at this point. Yes, Tomek, what you imply makes sense, but how do I search for artifacts of individual

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
Makes sense, since I am browsing the database with SQLite Expert and there are no Filename entries for me to purge after the shun. I really think this is a flaw if not a bug. When adding files, the permanence should be stated somewhere in the doc's. I think it was, but I had no luck using the

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
Ha, that is also a flaw or bug! Once a file is deleted should not mean I can never reconsider adding it in the future. On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com wrote: Just a note on whether this is a bug or not. I thought it was, but if files changed by a shuned

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
Well, I would love a sql that could return all orphaned files? Then I could remove them according to some id. On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Tomek Kott tkott.li...@outlook.com wrote: I think if you added a new file, it would get it's own artifact (and uuid), and know nothing of the prior

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
Heretofore, fossil has been a great product. I will test this error case again when I have more time. To call this is a feature is salt in a wound, now several hours exposed to the air. I am back from a 200MB repo to a 2MB repo by using another great tool: 7zip :) On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:14

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
. If shunning where to be enhanced to remove related files, where do you end the relationship. Depending on how you define related, every file in a repository is related! Sky5walk wanted to get rid of a single large file. He attempted to do this by shunning 4 manifest artifacts that referred

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-30 Thread sky5walk
Ok, this is definitely a case of if I knew then what I know now I could proceed as you say. The problem is I read the shunning instructions and did not see mention of possible orphaning of my files. Once I shunned the artifacts that triggered the file additions (thought it made sense), I was

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-08-31 Thread sky5walk
Yes, yes I get it. But thinking more deeply on what 'fossil' implies... I truly want ONLY the fossil and NOT the entire beast! :)) (The record of existence, but not all the pounds too...) On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:58 PM,

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-09-11 Thread sky5walk
Ok, Tried all previous suggestions and no go. Had a chance to do something very simple, but my experience was the same. I add a single LARGE file to my repo. I commit. I delete that LARGE file. I commit. I rebuild. The repo file size still contains the LARGE file in the blob table. Can I delete

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-09-11 Thread sky5walk
Ok, that removes the file from display, but the size of my repo has been permanently grown by the unwanted large file. Is that by design? I am right back at the beginning of this post. What if I or some other developer or some virus added ~../*.* ? Would I/Should I be forever saddled with the new

Re: [fossil-users] Please make shunning a first class feature.

2012-09-11 Thread sky5walk
tada! That worked! Question: How come I cannot use fossil shun a large file sha1 from a command line? I can only shun from the ui? That makes it difficult to automate if there are hundreds of files to shun. :( Thanks for fossil. On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org

[fossil-users] [v123 - Windows] Timeline view does not respect CRLF's in commit comments?

2012-09-30 Thread sky5walk
fossil ui SHOWS THIS Timeline... 22:23 [d742fd9596] Leaf: 2012.09.30 1) Changed this... 2) Broke that... (user: sky5walk, tags: trunk) INSTEAD OF: 22:23 [d742fd9596] Leaf: 2012.09.30 1) Changed this... 2) Broke that... (user: sky5walk, tags: trunk) Thanks for Fossil

Re: [fossil-users] [v123 - Windows] Timeline view does not respect CRLF's in commit comments?

2012-10-01 Thread sky5walk
. Type . on a line by itself when # you are done: 2012.09.30 1) Changed this... 2) Broke that... . New_Version: d742fd95965ddb1a4f2d6bba36247a9f01d22a86 fossil ui SHOWS THIS Timeline... 22:23 [d742fd9596] Leaf: 2012.09.30 1) Changed this... 2) Broke that... (user: sky5walk, tags: trunk

Re: [fossil-users] [v123 - Windows] Timeline view does not respect CRLF's in commit comments?

2012-10-01 Thread sky5walk
... 22:23 [d742fd9596] Leaf: 2012.09.30 1) Changed this... 2) Broke that... (user: sky5walk, tags: trunk) INSTEAD OF: 22:23 [d742fd9596] Leaf: 2012.09.30 1) Changed this... 2) Broke that... (user: sky5walk, tags: trunk) Thanks for Fossil

Re: [fossil-users] status of TODO list (was Re: comparison with Git)

2012-10-13 Thread sky5walk
Hi, I too, am a very grateful Fossil user. However, I am both teased and puzzled by... New information is added but old information is never destroyed. (Ignore the whole shun mechanism for now...) I tend to agree with the philosophy of retaining working doodles and tinkerings of code. But, an

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil design error and possible ways to fix it

2012-11-22 Thread sky5walk
This is great news! Does this mean commit comments will respect embedded [CR+LF] characters in the Timeline view? Happy Thanksgiving all you American users :) On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Ramon Ribó ram...@compassis.com wrote: Comments and tickets are already text only. The point here is

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

2013-01-15 Thread sky5walk
Hi, I know it's been asked before, but will v1.25 be available soon for download? Thanks for fossil. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Maxim Khitrov m...@mxcrypt.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Ruediger Haertel

[fossil-users] [v1.23] How to show timeline -showfiles as default in ui?

2013-01-16 Thread sky5walk
fossil ui admin - configuration - index page = /timeline -showfiles I got this unrecoverable error using Chrome. This webpage has a redirect loop The webpage at http://127.0.0.1:8080/timeline%20-showfiles has resulted in too many redirects. Clearing your cookies for this site or allowing

Re: [fossil-users] [v1.23] How to show timeline -showfiles as default in ui?

2013-01-16 Thread sky5walk
DOH! Easier than I thought. fossil ui admin - configuration - index page = /timeline?n=20fc On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:55 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: fossil ui admin - configuration - index page = /timeline -showfiles I got this unrecoverable error using Chrome. This webpage has a

Re: [fossil-users] A warning on 'undo'

2013-01-18 Thread sky5walk
When in doubt, I run: fossil status On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote: Hello, fossil overwrote some changes I had, without telling, on 'undo' command; I'd prefer it to give a warning. I used: $ fossil merge otherbranch $ test... edit a file...

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

2013-01-18 Thread sky5walk
Well, it looks like a Win32 binary for v1.25 is DIY. :( Really want to try the new fossil diff features... I am slightly C literate but don't use that environment day to day. I downloaded latest fossil src and zlib and MinGW and Pelles C and no luck trying their make files. Is there an explicit

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

2013-01-18 Thread sky5walk
Whoa! I am psyched if it's really that easy! 1. Visual Studio is not in my PATH, but the following cmd seems to have tried and failed? - c:\_Soft\fossil\src\winC:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\bin\nmake /f Makefile.msc - Microsoft

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

2013-01-18 Thread sky5walk
Done! :) Had to download VS10 Express. Then as Jan said, run: Visual Studio Command Prompt (2010) Then run per fossil doc's and Dr Hipp C:\_Soft\fossil\src\winnmake /f Makefile.msc No changes required. Thanks for fossil. On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

2013-01-19 Thread sky5walk
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:09 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: Whoa! I am psyched if it's really that easy! 2. Trying MinGW got the furthest... - c:\_Soft\fossil\srcC:\MinGW\msys\1.0\bin\make -f

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

2013-01-21 Thread sky5walk
Done. Can't believe I didn't see that :( Fossil v$release_version$manifest_version $manifest_date Thanks for fossil! On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:11 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: Another question about compiling fossil from

Re: [fossil-users] Admin Password seems to change by it's self

2013-01-28 Thread sky5walk
Cool! I never thought to use a straight copy of my repo. Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es wrote... Perhaps what you want is a simply raw copy of the repository file, it will keep all users and other sensitive information and after that you can use sync, or pullpush. After cloning, I

[fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-05 Thread sky5walk
Hi, I noticed I am getting simple case sensitive differences despite having [ ] case-sensitive unchecked in local and remote repos? Anything else I need to do? fossil version 1.25 [80bf94e0f7] 2013-01-18 21:34:21 UTC Thanks for fossil! ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread sky5walk
Oh wow! Didn't realize there was no global case-insensitive setting for file contents? The problem arises from code edits without syntax highlighting. So 'PI2' might be 'pi2' and fossil traps this as a diff. Where do I edit globs for file contents? ...with that possibility in mind, e.g.

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread sky5walk
Ok, Added a feature request after not finding similar request: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview/c6afac6dee54d6658e66ed7b7ad8d5b18bd899a1 Thanks for fossil! On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:20 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread sky5walk
Well, I agree, but the diff tools I use always have an 'ignore case' option. Seems logical to me that would be an option in fossil also. Unless text vs binary file assignments are super difficult? While I prefer to seek the root of a problem, I cannot guarantee syntax highlighting of source code.

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread sky5walk
Yes, I definitely have mixes of meaningful and non-meaningful [white space, case sensitive, empty lines] diffs to review. While I would love to 'one-tool it' with fossil's diff tech, I find it way easier to pop into winmerge and all its ignore goodies. Maybe I'm too optimistic to expect that much

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread sky5walk
Well, it is easier than that since I review the diffs in winmerge and 90% of the time I can ignore all diffs and commit. And what does trickle through sticks out quite nicely. Being a small development team, I only use a few fossil cmds and in a tight flow. fcom=fossil commit --user me

Re: [fossil-users] Git import newlines in comments

2013-05-27 Thread sky5walk
On the web interface, all of the commit message are displayed inside of span class='timelineComment'.../span. So you can perhaps adjust the look of comments to your liking by editing the CSS and without having to touch code. This has been a long time nuisance for me. Can someone provide a CSS

Re: [fossil-users] Git import newlines in comments

2013-05-27 Thread sky5walk
Thanks but I see no changes to my Timeline comments? On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Isaac Jurado dipto...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:36 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: On the web interface, all of the commit message are displayed inside of span

Re: [fossil-users] Git import newlines in comments

2013-05-27 Thread sky5walk
Yes, I tried that. Should there be a prefix to the .timelineComment? .timelineComment { font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; } I noticed 'white-space: pre;' is used in other places in the CSS. On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013

Re: [fossil-users] Git import newlines in comments

2013-05-27 Thread sky5walk
Just to be explicit, my comments are loaded without markups but do contain [CRLF]'s. I am unsure of the presence of my original [CRLF]'s within the timeline data? I also tried 'span.timeline...' with no effect. Should this work on previously loaded comments or only newly added ones? This would be

Re: [fossil-users] Git import newlines in comments

2013-05-27 Thread sky5walk
Ahh! Very cool. The manifest shows my [CRLF]'s were compressed to [LF]'s = /n, but no matter. The edit window shows the line feeds properly. Wish I could get that to cascade to my Timeline view? On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:04

Re: [fossil-users] Git import newlines in comments

2013-05-27 Thread sky5walk
Ok, I get same results with Chrome or IE. Even though the edit pane displays [LF]'s, the html source did not show any within the text section? I'll monitor this thread to see if any CSS gurus can explain? Thanks for trying. On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:

Re: [fossil-users] Git import newlines in comments

2013-05-27 Thread sky5walk
SuperAwesome! Thanks Isaac and for this topic. It's like someone cleaned my windshield :)) Wow, another one of my fossil thorns removed so easily. Thanks for fossil! On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Isaac Jurado dipto...@gmail.com wrote: Replying sky5w...@gmail.com: I am using fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Did you know that Fossil could do...

2013-05-28 Thread sky5walk
Yes, I noticed the changed formatting of the Timeline box and clicked it and discovered the feature. Some form of highlighting/flashing on hover or a tooltip is more explicit. I like the cursor changing approach also. On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On

Re: [fossil-users] Windows newb questions

2013-06-27 Thread sky5walk
c:\myrepo\fossil settings crnl-glob '*' -- OK on Windows 7 c:\myrepo\fossil settings crnl-glob * -- FAIL on Windows 7 c:\myrepo\fossil settings crnl-glob * -- FAIL on Windows 7 But in my case, the report is: crnl-glob(local) '*'-- Why local instead of global? And

Re: [fossil-users] Windows newb questions

2013-06-27 Thread sky5walk
c:\myrepofossil settings crnl-glob \* Usage: fossil settings ?PROPERTY? ?VALUE? Still don't understand the context of local vs global in this case? On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:45 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [fossil-users] Windows newb questions

2013-06-27 Thread sky5walk
Ah, I didn't catch that --global switch as it was at the very bottom of the ui settings page. :( On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:18 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: c:\myrepofossil settings crnl-glob \* Usage: fossil settings

Re: [fossil-users] Windows newb questions

2013-06-27 Thread sky5walk
Sorry, but I am still thwarted? c:\myrepofossil settings --global crnl-glob '*' c:\myrepofossil settings ~... case-sensitive (local) 0 crnl-glob(local) '*' This is fossil version 1.25 [4452f85156] 2013-05-28 21:31:57 UTC On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Windows newb questions

2013-06-27 Thread sky5walk
Haha, well done. I love this mail list! On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: If a local and a global setting exist, local have priority. Try: fossil unset crnl-glob Then you will see the '(global)' (Sory typing on my phone) -- Martin G.

Re: [fossil-users] Where do you point fossil newcomers for help?

2013-06-28 Thread sky5walk
I must agree the initial startup for me was a bit time consuming. But the amount of embedded features kept me going vs jumping into the usual suspects: git,subversion,mercurial. I now rely on a cheat sheet text document and a windows batch file that preloads doskey elements and fossil cmds for

Re: [fossil-users] autosync with fossil merge

2013-07-19 Thread sky5walk
I don't think autosync on depends on the size of the development team. For me it was more a problem due to disconnected repo's from VPN timeouts or actually offline. We turn off autosync and manually push and pull as needed. That way, we are never caught off guard. On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:08

Re: [fossil-users] Merge Conflicts?

2013-07-19 Thread sky5walk
Thanks, always wanted to know. On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:45 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: Example output after a fossil merge: Merging fork [11067f09a863a444] at 2013-07-01 14:44:53 by userx: added something... UPDATE

[fossil-users] Merge Conflicts?

2013-07-19 Thread sky5walk
Example output after a fossil merge: Merging fork [11067f09a863a444] at 2013-07-01 14:44:53 by userx: added something... UPDATE file1 MERGE file2 MERGE file3 * 1 merge conflicts in file3 MERGE file4 * 2 merge conflicts in file4 MERGE file5 WARNING: 2 merge conflicts fossil undo is

Re: [fossil-users] how to delete old history?

2013-07-24 Thread sky5walk
From my Fossil cheat sheet...regarding this mail thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg09584.html - fossil shunning or deleting files permanently. - Use the Admin - Shun page on fossil ui. Then enter the full SHA1 of the artifact to delete. Then

Re: [fossil-users] how to delete old history?

2013-07-24 Thread sky5walk
True, that was already discussed in the attached thread. Some mentioned SQL dumps of artifacts, or you could open your repo in a SQLite browser to get the list. But, at least it works. Automating shuns is high on my list too! At least enable the cmd via fossil.exe and not just the ui? On Wed,

Re: [fossil-users] fossil commit is extremely slow

2013-07-27 Thread sky5walk
If Windows, add fossil.exe to the excluded process list of your antivirus app. On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith eas@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: That is ridiculous. Most commits take less than a second, even on

Re: [fossil-users] Incompatible and undocumented output change between 1.24 and 1.27

2013-10-07 Thread sky5walk
Fossil has never guaranteed specific output for any given command, ...~ The output of any and all commands is subject to change without notice between any given versions. As a general rule, whoever hacks the feature determines the output format. i would go so far as to say that Fossil's output has

Re: [fossil-users] Incompatible and undocumented output change between 1.24 and 1.27

2013-10-07 Thread sky5walk
Very nice. My initial thoughts were to reproduce the existing fossil cmds but you are correct that this should not be the library's sole purpose. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:27 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: I guess the

Re: [fossil-users] commit message empty

2013-10-15 Thread sky5walk
I got something similar when I inadvertently left the prefix character '#' in front of my comment. On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:23 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote: I'm asking this for a colleague just starting to use fossil under windows (with which I have no experience

Re: [fossil-users] commit message empty

2013-10-15 Thread sky5walk
Haha, yeah that is one of the many in my fossil cheat sheet. ;) I'm still on the hook to deliver that. Just need to sanitize and prettify. Right now it is combined with my Windows Batch/Doskey commands. I was hoping to replace all that with the fossil api. On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:05 PM, j. van

Re: [fossil-users] commit message empty

2013-10-16 Thread sky5walk
When I stumbled on this '#' comment character commit issue, I was inclined to ask why that was chosen? I actually lost a '#define blah blah' comment I wanted to highlight. Can the comment character be user selectable at this late stage? I would prefer comments lead with ! or ' or ; or // or /* or

Re: [fossil-users] commit message empty

2013-10-16 Thread sky5walk
Yeah, I only asked for a user defined comment character since I thought it too bold to request it be changed outright. '#' is really too useful to me to be relegated to comments :( So many other useless characters to choose from? On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Stephan Beal

Re: [fossil-users] commit message empty

2013-10-17 Thread sky5walk
I also take exception to this being only a recent phenomena. I have been burned several times now, but as you say, this is not a mission critical error. However, me and my users cherish the timeline view and are confused by random omissions of '#'this or '#'that. So I do not feel the comments are

Re: [fossil-users] commit message empty

2013-10-17 Thread sky5walk
For those who don't know about it: fossil supports a -M (big emm) option which reads the commit message from a file and doesn't not apply any #-related special handling to the content (or it didn't at the time it was implemented, and i'm assuming that hasn't changed) - stephan beal Whoa, I

Re: [fossil-users] timeline cosmetics

2013-10-18 Thread sky5walk
Thanks! Haha, I'll make every effort to be around when 2 digit years are a problem. Consider it designed in persistence vs obsolescence. :) On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote: On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote: On

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil.exe: Catching errors?

2013-10-19 Thread sky5walk
Hi, I'm also attempting more and more automation of fossil cmd's dear to me. At this point, I'd like to limit my code to parsing fossil.exe output until I have more time to invest in the fossil.lib. Using Windows 7 x86 admin console and fossil v1.28 [feef]: For a purposely failed commit:

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil.exe: Catching errors?

2013-10-20 Thread sky5walk
Ok, reading stderr output is working. Never knew that couldn't be redirected with pipe? On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:01 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm also attempting more and more automation of fossil cmd's dear to me. At this point, I'd like to limit my code to parsing fossil.exe

[fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread sky5walk
I am curious what is stored in the repo for each new commit that includes a tiny change to a binary file. Whether a dll or an image file, is fossil storing each binary file compressed, uncompressed or some sort of delta? Over time(6mo's to 1yr), I would like to reduce my repo size by purging

Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread sky5walk
Ah, is there a way to quantify the binary delta? If I have a 1MB binary file and commit a 1 byte change, what is the size of the computed binary delta? You are correct of course, but I tend not to extend the spirit of fossil to binary files and images. It is their existence and not legacy that is

Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread sky5walk
Thanks. I didn't know how binary was handled given the Timeline diff response = cannot compute difference between binary files. I think it would be cool if instead fossil listed some of the metrics used or determined in the binary delta operation. Thanks for Fossil! On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:51

Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread sky5walk
Really, I am only implying some minimal file statistic like 'DeltaSize(%)' or somesuch to show the user it is in fact compared internally. The current message contradicts what is in fact happening. Maybe change that message to Cannot visually display binary diffs. DeltaSize(%) = -10. On Sun, Dec

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

2014-01-09 Thread sky5walk
Took time to reply, cause I had to clean the coffee I spit up! A released application should be considered stable and a conservative view would say its libs should not contain alphas or betas. The ease of compiling a bleeding edge Fossil.exe is already in place for those wishing to gain the latest

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

2014-01-09 Thread sky5walk
A while back when considering Fossil, I read that 'any' database could have been chosen in its design. This thread seems to contradict Fossil's published design theme? http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/tip/www/theory1.wiki Thoughts On The Design Of The Fossil DVCS: We claim that Fossil is not

Re: [fossil-users] Off-topic faith declarations (was Re: how to use git to lose data)

2014-09-02 Thread sky5walk
Well said and yes, Fossil is a non-tedious, benevolent lifesaver. My reservation being scalability of large repo support. While I am unaffected, those professionals charged with release and maintenance of large code bases look past Fossil and its SQLite core. Questions: Will Fossil ever seek to

Re: [fossil-users] Scalability (WAS: something else)

2014-09-02 Thread sky5walk
While disabling checksums helps with speed http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help?cmd=settings It does not help with redundant binary images in the repo. For that, you have to shun and rebuild. If you could flag a file as Keep latest only, that would be less painless. I don't mind the artifact

Re: [fossil-users] Scalability (WAS: something else)

2014-09-02 Thread sky5walk
​ (2) Fossil's purpose is to be able to recreate historical versions of the project - exactly. It cannot do that if historical images have been deleted. I understand the purity intended, but continue to be frustrated by it. :) I merely seek an automated way within Fossil to manage garbage.

  1   2   >