Re: [fossil-users] Support for commonmark markdown in fossil

2017-03-13 Thread David Vines
On 13/03/2017 15:50, Warren Young wrote: A related wish that comes up here now and then is some kind of pretty-printer support, so that common programming languages are colored nicely. Google’s code-prettify JS library would work for this: https://github.com/google/code-prettify

Re: [fossil-users] some uglifications for diff.tcl

2016-08-01 Thread David Vines
The comment style problem in attach.c is my fault - I'll provide a fix (I'm far too used to the // style of comment :) Dave ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: syntax highlighting for file, diff and code block rendering

2016-04-24 Thread David Vines
You may need to extend the list of file extensions in ext/syn.js, for example to support js as an extension for javascript I added case "js": t = "javascript"; break; Dave On 24/04/2016 18:04, Marko Käning wrote: Hi Svyatoslav, On 24.04.2016 14:31,

Re: [fossil-users] fossil amend ----edit-comment

2016-02-22 Thread David Vines
On 22/02/2016 06:28, jungle Boogie wrote: Question: Would one expect server A to pick up the amended timeline entry with the process above, or have I made a mistake with my amending? With autosync enabled, a synchronization happens prior to 'commit' and 'update' operations and after

Re: [fossil-users] Completely untagged commits ?

2016-01-05 Thread David Vines
On 05/01/2016 18:53, bch wrote: How did we end up w/ dave.vines' completely untagged (no branch) commits in the repository (or am I misreading what these are?) ? ref: /info/b208bf75777604dc /timeline?u=dave.vines=2016-01-05+10%3A12%3A56=200 If I've messed this up, I do most humbly

Re: [fossil-users] Completely untagged commits ?

2016-01-05 Thread David Vines
On 05/01/2016 19:53, Richard Hipp wrote: On 1/5/16, bch wrote: What's incorrect, the documentation, or the implementation ? Both, IIRC. I think you can convert a private branch to public by cancelling the "private" tag. But I don't think that feature is completely

Re: [fossil-users] Adding attachments via the command line

2016-01-04 Thread David Vines
On 04/01/2016 12:21, Stephan Beal wrote: fossil att[achment] add ... If it's a subcommand of "wiki" then the ability to use any unique short form of it doesn't come for free (that only works for top-level commands). :-? I was unaware of this capability, and it makes sense to me. The

Re: [fossil-users] Adding attachments via the command line

2016-01-04 Thread David Vines
On 04/01/2016 14:07, John P. Rouillard wrote: In message <568a7b26.7020...@zombi.eclipse.co.uk>, David Vines writes: On 04/01/2016 12:21, Stephan Beal wrote: fossil att[achment] add ... If it's a subcommand of "wiki" then the ability to use any unique short form of it doesn

[fossil-users] Adding attachments via the command line

2016-01-02 Thread David Vines
I now have a prototype for command line access to add attachments to wiki pages and tech notes. I'd like to ask for any feedback on the command itself before I polish my changes and put the changes up for review: fossil wiki attachment add ?PAGENAME? FILENAME [-t|--technote DATETIME ]

Re: [fossil-users] Command line access to technotes and attachments

2015-12-16 Thread David Vines
On 16/12/2015 15:50, Ron W wrote: Minor issue: While Fossil is inconsistent with this, the common convention for "long options" is --option with 2 dashes. I haven't used the "-mimetype" option so I don't know if it's a documentation error or implementation oversight. In other Fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Command line access to technotes and attachments

2015-12-16 Thread David Vines
On 15/12/2015 09:55, Stephan Beal wrote: Here's an encouraging anecdote for you: my first C work after 1995[1] was implementing the wiki CLI commands Richard mentioned :). i concur that the wiki commands would be the best starting point for adding Tech Note (formerly "event") CLI support.

Re: [fossil-users] Command line access to technotes and attachments

2015-12-15 Thread David Vines
On 14/12/2015 15:20, Richard Hipp wrote: I don't recall anybody ever writing such commands. There is nothing technically difficult about doing so - I just don't think the need has come up before. The technote code is in the event.c source file. You can use the "wiki" command implement in

[fossil-users] Command line access to technotes and attachments

2015-12-14 Thread David Vines
something obvious? David Vines ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users