Re: [fossil-users] Python bindings to Fossil?

2016-01-12 Thread Joe Prostko
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Tomek Kott wrote: > A year and a half ago, there was some discussion on creating some python bindings for Fossil/libfossil: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users%40lists.fossil-scm.org/msg18153.html. Does anyone know if that happened or where they might reside?

Re: [fossil-users] Veracity Version control

2015-03-12 Thread Joe Prostko
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:55 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: > Has anyone ever used Veracity? I used it very briefly, but ended up going to Fossil. The one guy behind it also wrote a book about VCSs called Version Control By Example < http://ericsink.com/vcbe/> that compares a given situation (team w

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.31 directory name

2015-03-09 Thread Joe Prostko
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > Fossil 1.31 has been published to the SlackBuild website. > > http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.1/development/fossil/ Very cool. I still didn't get around to making the Haiku packages yet, even though the build recipe has existed since the d

Re: [fossil-users] Timeline graph display options

2015-03-09 Thread Joe Prostko
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Which timeline graph do you prefer: > > (1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci&nomo=0 > (2) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci&nomo=1 I personally prefer 2. Initially 1 looks more aesthetically pleasing, but when

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil source download naming scheme

2015-02-24 Thread Joe Prostko
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:59 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: > Hi Joe, > How have you been updating packages in the past? > > All releases are like this: > 20150223162734 > 20150119112900 > 20140612172556 > 20140127173344 > 2013094349 I just used those as they were without issue. See any of the re

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil source download naming scheme

2015-02-24 Thread Joe Prostko
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 2/24/15, robotanarchy wrote: >> I'd replace the underscore with a dot, so it becomes >> >> fossil-1.31.tar.gz >> >> ..but other than that, that's my point. >> >> Can you guys do that? >> > > We can call things whatever we want. It's

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.31 directory name

2015-02-24 Thread Joe Prostko
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 2/24/15, Andy Goth wrote: >> Unlike previous releases, the unpacked directory name does not contain the >> seconds. This means the directory and archive filenames don't match, which >> is a problem for the SlackBuild script. >> >> Are t

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.31 testing

2015-02-23 Thread Joe Prostko
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 2/23/15, Joe Prostko wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >>> New tarball with the missing files has been uploaded. >> >> Are you sure about that? > > Uploaded yet agai

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.31 testing

2015-02-23 Thread Joe Prostko
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Joe Prostko wrote: > same error as previously mentioned. This is the source tar.gz in > question: https://www.fossil-scm.org/download/fossil-src-20150223162734.tar.gz As an FYI, the sha1sum matches what is reported on the website at http://www.hwa

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.31 testing

2015-02-23 Thread Joe Prostko
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > New tarball with the missing files has been uploaded. Are you sure about that? I tried buliding on two separate OS's now (Manjaro Linux and Haiku) and it fails to build with either with the same error as previously mentioned. This is the so

Re: [fossil-users] FLOSS interview

2015-01-09 Thread Joe Prostko
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:59 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > Hi Luca, > On 8 January 2015 at 23:18, Luca Ferrari wrote: > > Partly unrelated, and quite old, but there's another interesting > > interview about SQLite: http://twit.tv/show/floss-weekly/26 > > > > Yes, but unfortunately the file is 404.

Re: [fossil-users] Any other language bindings to Fossil?

2014-11-07 Thread Joe Prostko
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Joe Prostko wrote: >> >> Thanks for the advice. I will probably start work this weekend, although like a lot of us, I don't have a ton of spare time nowadays, so progress will lik

Re: [fossil-users] Any other language bindings to Fossil?

2014-11-07 Thread Joe Prostko
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Ron W wrote: >> >> You should not need to port s2 to Python, rather reference the s2 bindings to libfossil as an example. > > > Indeed, don't try to port it - shape the API how you want it, using s2 as a guid

Re: [fossil-users] Any other language bindings to Fossil?

2014-11-06 Thread Joe Prostko
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Ron W wrote: > You should not need to port s2 to Python, rather reference the s2 bindings to libfossil as an example. Yeah, that is why I put `port` in quotes in my last response. I probably should have just stated what I actually meant instead. :) > I am consi

Re: [fossil-users] Any other language bindings to Fossil?

2014-11-06 Thread Joe Prostko
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Joe Prostko wrote: >> >> Has anybody done any work on interfaces between Fossil and other programming languages, or is that something that still requires a lot of work to be done? >

[fossil-users] Any other language bindings to Fossil?

2014-11-06 Thread Joe Prostko
Hello, I know that libfossil is in progress, but has anybody been doing work that involves doing Python or PHP bindings to Fossil (whether or not they are utilizing libfossil or not)? I'm asking since I have been starting to utilize Salt < http://www.saltstack.com/> lately for work, and well, the

Re: [fossil-users] Issue compiling with 16f1076334 and newer revisions

2014-07-27 Thread Joe Prostko
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2014-07-26 5:08 GMT+02:00 Joe Prostko : >> Using the handy `fossil bisect`, I found that this revision is causing >> me problems while compiling Fossil from within Haiku. > > Should be fixed here: > <http://fos

Re: [fossil-users] Issue compiling with 16f1076334 and newer revisions

2014-07-26 Thread Joe Prostko
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Joe Prostko wrote: > Using the handy `fossil bisect`, I found that this revision is causing > me problems while compiling Fossil from within Haiku. I did some more digging, and the problem seems to be that the assert.h included from within config.h is c

[fossil-users] Issue compiling with 16f1076334 and newer revisions

2014-07-25 Thread Joe Prostko
Using the handy `fossil bisect`, I found that this revision is causing me problems while compiling Fossil from within Haiku. This revision brought in -D_HAVE_SQLITE_CONFIG_H and in theory should work on platforms that support utime() and usleep(). In any case, I have found that for Haiku anyway,

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil is now 7 years old

2014-07-25 Thread Joe Prostko
Congratulations! I must say that Fossil is the best thing to happen to my development workflow this year, as I am pretty sure that using Git has resulted in the premature death of too many of my brain cells. I'm glad to be able to replace Git in every place that I possibly can with Fossil. The o

Re: [fossil-users] Minor fossil success story

2014-07-14 Thread Joe Prostko
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Maybe I'll add Stephan's quote to > http://www.fossil-svm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/quotes.html I think you meant http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/quotes.wiki . :) ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Update config.* in autosetup directory?

2014-07-07 Thread Joe Prostko
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Joe Prostko wrote: >> >> Is there any chance those two files can be updated? >> >> They are available at the following links: >> >> config.guess: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=conf

Re: [fossil-users] Update config.* in autosetup directory?

2014-07-07 Thread Joe Prostko
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Joe Prostko wrote: > I was just trying to build Fossil on the x86-64 version of Haiku, and > it didn't get far since the platform failed to be identified. I > replaced the versions of config.guess and config.sub shipped with > Fossil and then

Re: [fossil-users] Changing header include order in main.c

2014-06-23 Thread Joe Prostko
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Joe Prostko wrote: >> >> If I move the zlib.h inclusion below the crypto.h inclusion's #endif, >> then Fossil compiles and works fine with both GCC2 and GCC4. >> > > Fixed on trunk. Thanks for t

[fossil-users] Changing header include order in main.c

2014-06-22 Thread Joe Prostko
Hello, Something else I found while compiling Fossil on Haiku. It should be the last issue I'm having. I admit I didn't notice it before 1.29 came out, but essentially this commit caused me some problems: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/48f1239eb2e9098b5c2f3b7d118683e4418f4696 The change

[fossil-users] Update config.* in autosetup directory?

2014-06-21 Thread Joe Prostko
Hello, I was just trying to build Fossil on the x86-64 version of Haiku, and it didn't get far since the platform failed to be identified. I replaced the versions of config.guess and config.sub shipped with Fossil and then configure worked, as well as the rest of the build. Is there any chance t

Re: [fossil-users] FYI: doc URLs don't work with filenames that have + in their names

2014-05-27 Thread Joe Prostko
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On 5/27/2014 17:10, Joe Prostko wrote: >> >> On May 27, 2014 6:58 PM, "Warren Young" > <mailto:war...@etr-usa.com>> wrote: >> >> > Incidentally, I'm bothering with nginx proxying bec

Re: [fossil-users] FYI: doc URLs don't work with filenames that have + in their names

2014-05-27 Thread Joe Prostko
On May 27, 2014 6:58 PM, "Warren Young" wrote: > Incidentally, I'm bothering with nginx proxying because the SCGI method seems to have broken in 1.28. It was working fine on my site with 1.27 from the Ubuntu repository until I upgraded to 1.28 by building from source. (I wanted the /tree featur

Re: [fossil-users] fossil server responds Not Found [1.28]

2014-05-22 Thread Joe Prostko
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:00 AM, pablo wrote: > Hi to all, > > What I have to do for FOSSIL SERVER to work on my server? > > I have installed a linux server on a VmWare Workstation and using the 1.28 > version of fossil. > When I try to browse the repository i get a message of "Not Found" no matte

Re: [fossil-users] Location of ".fossil" Database

2014-05-21 Thread Joe Prostko
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > And if the dir structure doesn't exist, fossil has to go creating it, etc. > We "know" the home dir exists, which makes it easy. Ideal? No, but easy. Indeed. That is why I'm likely going to simply not bother making any changes whatsoever t

Re: [fossil-users] Location of ".fossil" Database

2014-05-21 Thread Joe Prostko
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Igor de Oliveira Couto wrote: > Wow, I must confess I had never even heard of 'Haiku', so I had to go and > look it up! : Don't worry, you aren't the first person to tell me that. ;) > On 22 May 2014, at 2:11 am, Joe Prostko

Re: [fossil-users] Location of ".fossil" Database

2014-05-21 Thread Joe Prostko
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Igor de Oliveira Couto wrote: > loving it. One point that I found somewhat disappointing, is that Fossil > creates a ".fossil" database in my home directory. > > I know that many applications in Linux/Unix store their preferences and > settings in dot-files, in t