On 03/30/2013 02:59 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Steve Havelka yo...@q7.com
mailto:yo...@q7.com wrote:
You're saying that Fossil is intended to be used by few people, or
that
Fossil is intended not to have a user community?
Fossil _repos_
On 03/29/2013 09:29 AM, James Bremner wrote:
Just wondering why we need a dedicated fossil hosting service.
I have managed for years without.
For example: Copy fossil repository to dropbox folder; make folder
publicly available, or privately share it. Done!
Am I missing something?
On 03/29/2013 05:56 PM, Richie Adler wrote:
Matt Welland decía, en el mensaje Re: [fossil-users] Why do we need a fossil
hosting service? del Viernes, 29 de Marzo de 2013 14:38:25:
Ability for loosely coupled collaboration (i.e. fork).
Not exactly what Fossil was designed for, I believe...
On 12/31/2012 06:21 AM, Jan Danielsson wrote:
On 12/31/12 11:17, Nico Williams wrote:
[---]
But I feel I must at least address this
insinuation that I was trolling.
It's obvious that you aren't trolling. You don't have to defend
yourself against such nonsense.
I agree with Jan. I also
On 12/30/2012 03:26 PM, Michael Richter wrote:
If I had written a ten-page post explaining in excruciating detail
what rebase is, why it matters, and how to adapt it to the Fossil
philosophy, who -but who!- would have read that first post?
I, for one, would have. I wouldn't
On 12/15/2012 03:52 AM, Jan Danielsson wrote:
On 12/15/12 05:26, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
My opinion is that backward compatibility should be retained because various
people, including several that may not be involved in this discussion, have
existing scripts and other automation that relies upon
On 12/15/2012 06:28 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
Jan Danielsson wrote:
First, I feel you're inventing problems to make arguments in order to
exclude features which address real world issues. (A little like the
script issue brought up earlier).
Straw man argument. Five yard penalty, still
On 12/14/2012 06:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Themba Fletcher
themba.fletc...@gmail.com mailto:themba.fletc...@gmail.com wrote:
Could I humbly suggest unmanage for the name of the
remove-from-repo-and-leave-the-disk-alone command? This would be
On 12/13/2012 07:38 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
FWIW, I am following this thread with great interest. I think I
understand the various points of view. I think most everybody brings
up good points, and I encourage this kind of discussion.
My current leanings are to change rm and mv as follows:
On 11/22/2012 05:05 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
(2) Always assume text/x-fossil-wiki for check-in comments that were
entered prior to some cut-off date (say 2012-12-01) and assume
text/plain thereafter. Perhaps the cut-off date can be changed for
individual repositories using a configuration
My guess is that you don't really want to filter out bots, specifically,
but really anyone who's attempting to hit every link Fossil makes--that
is to say, it's the behavior that we're trying to stop here, not the actor.
I suppose what I'd do is set up a mechanism to detect when the remote
user
It seems like, at least for now, you ought to patch your own copy--I'm
not seeing any strong general response that that's a good or needed
change to make, so you could be waiting a while if you're waiting on the
main devs for this.
On 10/28/2012 09:57 AM, K wrote:
On Oct 26, 2012, Carlo Miron
Can someone with commit privileges fix the help message on fossil scrub?
[steve@localhost ~]$ fossil scrub
fossil: use --repository or -R to specify the repository database
[steve@localhost ~]$ fossil scrub -R myrepo
fossil: Usage: fossil scrub ?REPOSITORY?
aaand...
[steve@localhost ~]$ fossil
Not all of them, I don't think - just the one directly adjacent to the
new tag input field.
I actually had the same experience as Nolan yesterday..I typed in a new
tag name on the edit screen, hit the 'save' button, and the tag text I'd
just typed wasn't there. I went to the edit screen again,
On 07/19/2012 10:28 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
Seems to have been just a long-term oversight (no pun intended). i
can't say it's ever crossed my mind that a programming tool should
need to be screen-reader friendly.
It had never occurred to me that the fossil ui wouldn't play nicely with
screen
What happens now, if the checkbox is checked but the text field is empty?
On 07/19/2012 11:28 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Steve Havelka smh...@gmail.com
mailto:smh...@gmail.com wrote:
Would something simpler do the trick?
Like this - http
Perfect!
On 07/19/2012 11:29 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
mailto:sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Steve Havelka smh...@gmail.com
mailto:smh...@gmail.com wrote:
Would something
mailto:sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Steve Havelka smh...@gmail.com
mailto:smh...@gmail.com wrote:
Would something simpler do the trick?
Like this - http://pastebin.com/7k2B5iW9
That's 90% of it, but ignores the special case
On 05/30/2012 02:28 PM, Natacha Porté wrote:
Hello,
on Wednesday 23 May 2012 at 15:26, Richard Hipp wrote:
Nevertheless, though attached by fraud, the name is still inappropriate,
and must be changed before being added to Fossil.
Thanks to some invaluable help, I finally managed to get it
I've heard the same complaint a couple of times.
I'd suggest, underneath Timelines:, a new line, Source code: browse
| download .tgz | download .zip. I'd then put the manifest link
after the hash on the SHA Hash: line. I'd also rename the edit link
to edit checkin properties and leave
Dear list,
I built 1.21 from source tonight (no 64-bit prebuilt binaries), and
noticed this in testing:
steve@pewter ~/src/tmp/fossil-src-20111213135356 $ ./fossil
Usage: ./fossil COMMAND ...
or: ./fossil help -- for a list of common commands
or: ./fossil help COMMMAND -- for
If it is just three lines of code that filter out those characters, how
difficult would it be to wrap those into a configurable option, enabled
by default but with an option to disable for those who really know what
they're doing?
best,
Steve
On 3/8/2012 6:22 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
I'm
On 11/16/11 4:11 PM, Ron Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Jacek Całajacek.c...@gmail.com wrote:
and wonder why
fossil is by default so humble to not include a link to its web site
in the footer.
Maybe to encourage users to contact their project leader first?
In my team, I've
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:51:05 -0700 Caleb Gray ca...@calebgray.com wrote:
[trimmed ...] What are the community's feelings on
jQuery? I get the gist that externals are trying to be avoided, so
that's why I'm asking, I would love to write a library that turns the
current site in to a highly
Hi all,
Today, while playing around with an experimental repository, I ran up
against the character length limit (3-100 bytes) on wiki page names. The
limit is not, I discovered, on the number of characters in the page
name, but just the number of bytes, i.e. unicode page names consisting
of
On 10/5/11 2:19 AM, Eric wrote:
On Wed, October 5, 2011 6:14 am, Matt Welland wrote:
...
Every time pragmatism loses to philosophy someone, somewhere, is gonna get
screwed.
But pragmatic decisions made by someone who doesn't understand the
philosophy/principles/rules can also cause problems,
On 10/4/11 4:11 PM, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote:
Found it. In the UI, go to the Files section, select a file, click
on Shun in the menu bar, and finalize with Rebuild.
As has already been said, you don't really want to do that. If you think
you do, you do not understand what Fossil is for, nor do
On 10/4/11 4:35 PM, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote:
Oh, sorry, I'm not talking about Fossil's philosophy (I'm okay with not deleting stuff),
I'm talking about about the tone of the message (nor do you understand the
principles of software engineering).
Well, I agree with you there, too. : )
Excuse my bluntness: that sounds like a terrible idea. Tcl is huge
compared to fossil, and certainly not installed everywhere by default.
And for what benefit? To have a full-blown programming language built
in? That of course isn't a benefit in itself. If an organization needs
some sort
Hi all. This might be a very simple question, but I've poked around a bit
to try to find an answer and have come up empty.
How do you escape the square brackets [ and ] in wiki-markup, so that
they're not turned into links?
E.g., array[x] = 1; -- don't want [x] turned into a link.
I tried \,
30 matches
Mail list logo
