[fossil-users] unexpected ticket behavior

2010-04-19 Thread Joshua Paine
I tried to reassign a ticket and append a comment at the same time. (I 
have an assigned-to field. I'm not sure if I added that or if it's 
standard.) My changes silently failed--I just ended up viewing the 
unchanged ticket. After trying this several times, downloading the 
latest snapshot, and rebuilding my repos to no avail, I eventually did 
it in two separate steps, and it worked.

This is contrary to what I would expect and how other systems work. 
(E.g., used to be in bugzilla that you couldn't make any other changes 
unless you added a comment at the same time!) If there's a good reason 
for having it this way, it definitely should let me know why it's 
ignoring my changes. (If the reason is to make a clearer history trail, 
I'd rather fossil just generated two history events from my 
two-changes-in-one submission.)

-- 
Joshua Paine
LetterBlock: Web applications built with joy
http://letterblock.com/
301-576-1920
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] unexpected ticket behavior

2010-04-19 Thread Chris
Refer to the fossil ticketing system ticket id: 3dbc12f49d on 4 April
2010.

On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 06:16 -0400, Joshua Paine wrote:
 I tried to reassign a ticket and append a comment at the same time. (I 
 have an assigned-to field. I'm not sure if I added that or if it's 
 standard.) My changes silently failed--I just ended up viewing the 
 unchanged ticket. After trying this several times, downloading the 
 latest snapshot, and rebuilding my repos to no avail, I eventually did 
 it in two separate steps, and it worked.
 
 This is contrary to what I would expect and how other systems work. 
 (E.g., used to be in bugzilla that you couldn't make any other changes 
 unless you added a comment at the same time!) If there's a good reason 
 for having it this way, it definitely should let me know why it's 
 ignoring my changes. (If the reason is to make a clearer history trail, 
 I'd rather fossil just generated two history events from my 
 two-changes-in-one submission.)
 


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] unexpected ticket behavior

2010-04-19 Thread Stephan Beal
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Joshua Paine jos...@letterblock.comwrote:

 I tried to reassign a ticket and append a comment at the same time. (I
 have an assigned-to field. I'm not sure if I added that or if it's
 standard.) My changes silently failed--I just ended up viewing the
 unchanged ticket. After trying this several times, downloading the
 latest snapshot, and rebuilding my repos to no avail, I eventually did
 it in two separate steps, and it worked.


i had a similar problem where i added a Subsystem field to the initial
ticket view (it normally doesn't appear there). When setting the subsystem
via the ticket-open view the setting never stuck. When subsequently editing
the ticket later, it did stick. My assumption is that the ticket-posting
code is different for an initial ticket, and only accepts a hard-coded list
of fields, but i didn't look into it (i was just happy to have a
workaround).

-- 
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users