Bizarrely, I went back to this today and fossil compiled first time
without me needing to specify any --with-openssl options. I've no idea
why!
On 2014-09-11T17:33:33 -0400
Eric Rubin-Smith eas@gmail.com wrote:
A stripped shared library would not be worth much, since the whole point
of a
Hello,
more likely than not this is not related, but perhaps it gives a hint
in the right direction anyway: on NetBSD there is also an openssl in
the base-system, and one in pkgsrc (NetBSD's equivalent of ports).
In my case, fossil's ./configure could find openssl, but the resulting
binary could
'Lo.
The fossil build scripts seem to be unable to find openssl on FreeBSD
9.2. It has a choice of the version included with the base system
(in /usr) or the version available from FreeBSD ports (/usr/local),
but it can't seem to find either of them.
Is there any way to get it to give more
org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com wrote:
'Lo.
The fossil build scripts seem to be unable to find openssl on FreeBSD
9.2. It has a choice of the version included with the base system
(in /usr) or the version available from FreeBSD ports (/usr/local),
but it can't seem to find either of
On 2014-09-11T16:09:42 -0400
Eric Rubin-Smith eas@gmail.com wrote:
I skimmed through the configure code. Looks like you need to have
the subdir and file 'openssl/ssl.h' beneath the dir you specify, and
the subdir and files 'lib/libssl.so' and 'lib/libcrypto.so' beneath the
dir you
On 12 Sep 2014, at 5:06 am, org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com wrote:
'Lo.
The fossil build scripts seem to be unable to find openssl on FreeBSD
9.2. It has a choice of the version included with the base system
(in /usr) or the version available from FreeBSD ports (/usr/local),
but it
6 matches
Mail list logo