Re: [fossil-users] Merge SSH changes?

2013-08-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:42:12 -0400: That's the way it used to work. I think Andy's changes fix it so that it doesn't work that way any more. I'm disappointed too, and would like to find a solution that works both ways. Ok, I've reimplemented the original

[fossil-users] Merge SSH changes?

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, Last week I sent out an email regarding the new SSH changes, which I believe are ready to go: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg12579.html I have been using it and it feels stable. There has only been one change since then (cleans up output during

Re: [fossil-users] Merge SSH changes?

2013-08-05 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.orgwrote: Hello, Last week I sent out an email regarding the new SSH changes, which I believe are ready to go: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg12579.html I have been using it and it

Re: [fossil-users] Merge SSH changes?

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:21:05 -0400: I just tried it, and it is different, isn't it. :-|. Let me mess around some and see if I can live with the change. Apparently, I'll need to get real familiar with --ssh-fossil-user Yes, it's a bit different becuase now

Re: [fossil-users] Merge SSH changes?

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Bradford on 05 Aug 2013 14:40:08 -0600: Addtionally, it is now possible to use SSH keys and Force Commands to restrict the SSH account to doing Fossil only activities. s/possible/easier/ It was always possible to write a wrapper script, but it's much easier if fossil is the

Re: [fossil-users] Merge SSH changes?

2013-08-05 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.orgwrote: Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:21:05 -0400: I just tried it, and it is different, isn't it. :-|. Let me mess around some and see if I can live with the change. Apparently, I'll need to get

Re: [fossil-users] Merge SSH changes?

2013-08-05 Thread Matt Welland
Unfortunately even though I'm very interested I haven't had time to look closely at this new ssh approach. Is the following use case possible to implemen with your code? I ask because I hear some emphasis on the many-to-one mapping and I'm interested in one-to-one mapping. Each person given

Re: [fossil-users] Merge SSH changes?

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:42:12 -0400: Once I have my ssh key entered I should be able to do all operations (clone, sync, commit etc.) without entering my password but the remote fossil knows who I am. That's the way it used to work. I think Andy's changes fix

Re: [fossil-users] Merge SSH changes?

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Bradford on 05 Aug 2013 22:42:44 -0600: It would be better if I didn't have to rely on a script for this, which is why I thought a new fossil subcommand would be useful. This would mean all I have to put into my command= is something like: Ok, scratch that. I've already