Re: [fossil-users] New command proposal?

2013-07-29 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said David Mason on Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:16:08 -0400: command=/home/fossilcm/bin/fossil gate otheruser ssh-rsa ... where the name after gate defines the fossil user that this represents, and the ... are the public keys from the particular users. Should this instead

Re: [fossil-users] New command proposal?

2013-07-29 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Alan Barrett on Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:29:37 +0200: Regardless of whether this is a good idea or not, please do not call it fossil gate. Please give it a name that alerts the user to the fact that it's very closely tied to ssh. Understood. At this point, it is really just a concept

Re: [fossil-users] New command proposal?

2013-07-25 Thread David Mason
It appears that gitolite works much like mercurial-server. What I would expect (I haven't set up fossil yet, because I need this functionality) is that the authorized_keys file for the fossilcm user would have: command=/home/fossilcm/bin/fossil gate admin ssh-rsa ...

Re: [fossil-users] New command proposal?

2013-07-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Rene on Sun, 21 Jul 2013 00:00:01 +0200: A forced command is in place and it can only be fossil http.This will check if it is started via ssh and then look in the environment to see if the request was fossil gate myotherdb. For now, I think I will abandon the idea that this type of

Re: [fossil-users] New command proposal?

2013-07-21 Thread Matt Welland
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.orgwrote: [snip] I'm trying to accomplish what I believe Matt Welland was suggesting it do, which I did like. Basically, if I have an SSH account named ``fossil'' on my server, I can use it to server out as many

Re: [fossil-users] New command proposal?

2013-07-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:16:42 -0700: The ssh key is being used to give access only to the fossil file and yes, the access list would map ssh keys (thus users) to fossils. Just for clarification... access list would map an SSH key user to fossils, but not

Re: [fossil-users] New command proposal?

2013-07-21 Thread Matt Welland
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1377061791.goefgfndahogdhegp...@bradfords.org wrote: Notice that I'm able to access multiple fossil files with my SSH key and Fossil account. And, I can install as many SSH keys into the ``guest'' account as I like. This is a

[fossil-users] New command proposal?

2013-07-20 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, I've been working on a simple fossil command that will integrate with SSH accounts where SSH keys are in use and wonder if there is a formal process for coming up with new subcommand names? Here is what I have at the moment: $ fossil help gate Usage: fossil gate ?FILENAME?

Re: [fossil-users] New command proposal?

2013-07-20 Thread Rene
On 2013-07-20 23:06, Andy Bradford wrote: Hello, I've been working on a simple fossil command that will integrate with SSH accounts where SSH keys are in use and wonder if there is a formal process for coming up with new subcommand names? Here is what I have at the moment: $ fossil

Re: [fossil-users] New command proposal?

2013-07-20 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Rene on Sun, 21 Jul 2013 00:00:01 +0200: A forced command is in place and it can only be fossil http.This will check if it is started via ssh and then look in the environment to see if the request was fossil gate myotherdb. what are you trying to archive? I'm trying to